• weew
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    That would be nice if we had an unlimited supply of livers to transplant. Give everyone a chance.

    Unfortunately I’d still rather give whatever liver we have on hand to someone guaranteed not to wreck it immediately, because giving her a chance means taking away someone else’s.

    • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, not in this case, they weren’t taking away someone else’s chance. But you didn’t read the article. Her boyfriend was a match and wanted to donate part of his liver. Donar A wanted to give to recipient B, there was no recipient C losing out. It was a closed loop.

      “No amount of determination from the (partner) could bend the decision,” said the physician. “There was no process for a second review or appeal. Just a harsh finality … goodbye.”

      She many have not even been the drunkard you all are assuming she was. If you go out once a month, and have 3 or 4 beers, you’re not eligible for a liver transplant. That’s ridiculous. You may not drink the other 30 days of the month, but that one Saturday ruined it for you; you die.

      A life was forfeit, because some bean counters in white coats -probably not teetotalers themselves- deemed her not worthy. Even though it cost more to let her die,

      Using the most recent data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information on hospital bed costs (2016), Huska’s time at the Oakville hospital likely cost over $450,000 - ($3,592 per day for ICU care) with an additional 61 days in a ward bed which likely cost about $1,200 a day

      A liver transplant in Ontario is pegged at about $71,000 to $100,000 in Ontario based on data from 2019.

      • exanime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That is because her boyfriend could only give her a partial transplant (he cannot donate his whole liver) and the doctors did not think it would work as her liver was too far gone to recover with a partial transplant

        The rest of your comment is so far from reality or logic, I’m not going to bother addressing it

      • weew
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Cutting out someone’s liver to transplant isn’t easy nor risk free. You are risking death to have a low probability of saving someone. It doesn’t matter if they are volunteers.

      • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Her partner is the one saying she had an alcohol substance use issue. It’s not “assumed” she was a drunkard, he stated it. I agree she should have been given the liver- she quit alcohol, she had a donor. We shouldn’t punish people with alcohol use issues by killing them.

        • CileTheSane
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          The liver wasn’t thrown away, it was given to someone else. The liver still saved a life, unfortunately it wasn’t hers.

          Unless you’re talking about the boyfriend’s liver, in which case the doctor determined her condition would not survive a partial transplant, and the attempt would just kill her sooner.

          • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            I was talking about the general disturbing nature of determining organ transplants, yes I know re: the live donation from her bf

            • CileTheSane
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 months ago

              So again: The liver wasn’t thrown away, it was given to someone else. The liver still saved a life, unfortunately it wasn’t hers.

              Imagine being the person denied a liver because they gave it to someone with a chronic alcohol abuse problem to “give them another chance”.

                • CileTheSane
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I was talking about the general disturbing nature of determining organ transplants, yes I know re: the live donation from her bf

                  No I meant her boyfriend had a partial liver he wanted to give her

                  Which is it?