SAO PAULO (AP) — Elon Musk’s satellite-based internet service provider Starlink backtracked Tuesday and said it will comply with a Brazilian Supreme Court justice’s order to block the billionaire’s social media platform, X.

Starlink said in a statement posted on X that it will heed Justice Alexandre de Moraes’ order despite him having frozen the company’s assets. Previously, it informally told the telecommunications regulator that it would not comply until de Moraes reversed course.

“Regardless of the illegal treatment of Starlink in freezing our assets, we are complying with the order to block access to X in Brazil,” the company statement said. “We continue to pursue all legal avenues, as are others who agree that @alexandre’s recent order violate the Brazilian constitution.”

    • CileTheSane
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Been beat? You didn’t even make an argument, just assumed nonsense was true.

      Does it exist? Yes. Is it everywhere? Hardly. Does the ban significantly reduce access and availability? Yes.

        • CileTheSane
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          You just resort to running away when you’ve been beat.

          • ravhall@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Look, the conversation was over when you started making personal attacks instead of staying on topic. It’s just the internet.

            • CileTheSane
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              The conversation was over when you kept insisting nothing could be done unless you ban the internet entirely, despite reality proving that wrong.

                • CileTheSane
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  You knew I was being facetious—I hope.

                  Considering that was the only thing resembling an argument in your post, I guess that means the conversation was over when you immediately gave up on trying to defend your argument and only posting something facetious.

                  Strange how you post something completely facetious and that’s fine, I reply with something facetious and you cry foul and run away.

                  • ravhall@discuss.online
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    It wasn’t a personal attack. There’s no point to that here. This is clearly upsetting you. I suggest we stop here.