An Austrian surgeon allegedly let his teenage daughter drill a hole in a patient’s skull.

Following a forestry accident in January, a 33-year-old man was flown by air ambulance to Graz University Hospital, Styria, southeastern Austria, with serious head injuries, according to Kronen Zeitung, an Austrian newspaper.

He needed emergency surgery, but the doctor allegedly let his 13-year-old daughter take part in operating on him.

The newspaper reported that she even drilled a hole in the patient’s skull.

While the operation was said to have gone off without issue, the patient is still unable to work and investigations by the Graz public prosecutor’s officer against the entire surgical team are continuing.

It wasn’t until April that an anonymous complaint was logged to the public prosecutor’s office about the allegations, the newspaper reported.

The alleged victim initially learned about the case in the media before later being told by authorities he was a witness in an investigation.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    229
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    …bro what the fuck was everyone else in the OR doing? Craniotomies take a full team of people, and every single person in that room should have lost their shit when a 13 year old got anywhere near it, let alone scrubbed in to the damn surgery and fucking practice medicine.

    Why didn’t the nurse unplug the thing? Why didn’t the tech cut the fucking cord? Why didn’t the anesthesiologist scroll more aggressively on his iPad??

    This story represents a metric shit-ton of failures, not just the surgeon/daughter.

  • Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Jfc, having the girl in the room at all is a liability, let alone letting her touch the patient.

    I hope this guy’s malpractice lawyer has good heart meds.

  • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I dont get how the surgeon thought this was okay. When I have a regular check up I have to give permission for a student doctor to simply sit in on my appointment.

    Having a 13 year old drill a hole in your head is waaay beyond that. I hope that doctor has their liscence revoked. They clearly don’t give a single fuck about their patients.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Always say yes to the student doctors and nurses, proud to do my part, but I damned near made a nurse cry one day. LOL, she was wrecked.

      I was in the hospital, think they were changing my IV to the other arm? Anyway, that was the sort of thing she was trying to stick me for. This poor woman couldn’t nail a vein after SIX tries, gave up utterly humiliated. She keep poking and missing and apologizing, poking and missing and apologizing, getting more flustered each time. I was cold stoned on opiates, thought it was rather amusing, though the pain was getting a little annoying. Still, kept telling her it was cool, she’s there to learn and I was happy to help.

      They bring another nurse in and he had to make two passes. Y’all, you can clearly see my forearm veins. Maybe I was a little dehydrated or something to do with the drugs?

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t surgeries usually have other assistants in the OR as well? Nobody was like “uh, hell no” to this guy bringing a child in and then letting her drill a hole in someone?

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Plenty of other people in there, my ex-wife was a scrub, did nothing but OR. But you do not cross a surgeon, and especially not in his domain. Hence the anonymous complaint that kicked this off.

      • groet@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        If somemebody drills a hole into my skull I dont give a shit about their insurance.

        Insurance protects them not me. This is absolutely about the doctor putting the patient into a huge unnecessary risk without the patients consent.

        • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          lol your mistype makes it look like you’re trying to set a legal precedence to collect insurance by claiming it was yourself drilling the hole in your head.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Let’s say something actually went wrong with the operation. Obviously you can sue the hospital, and you’d certainly win that. When you go to sue the doctor for being a fuckwad, his insurance isn’t going to cover it. And while I’m sure he’s got some money, he can hide it dick around about it just owe you a lot of money.

          No, there’s a good reason they require doctors to have insurance.

          • groet@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yes but “the biggest problem” is most certainly not the lack of insurance for the daughter. Its a untrained child playing with the live of a patient.

  • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    My understanding is that the drill is fixtured in position in procedures as delicate as this, so that it really can’t move and drill anywhere except where it needs to. Likely why Dad thought (wrongly) that it was harmless.

        • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve never seen a mounted drill in the OR (though I imagine there is an option for it - bed-mounted instruments and equipment are pretty common).

          Here’s a video that kinda shows how craniotomies go - this is just an animation, nothing gory. The drill in the animation is different from the onces I’ve seen used for cranis (pistol-shaped vs just a cylinder like the one I linked earlier) but either way, it’s very much a hand-held device.

          Even micro surgery like when we’re drilling in a tympanoplasty or cochlear implant placement - literally done under a microscope - it’s still just a little dremmel looking thing.

          • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I just wanted to be sure to say thank you for your thoughtful replies with sources, I have learned some things and enjoyed it.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Worked in orthopedic surgery for years (just a big nerd, not a surgeon) and it’s always strange seeing other surgical disciplines talking about the equipment used in a procedure. Like, ya’ll don’t just use a Dewalt in a sterile bag? Really?

            • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              ya’ll don’t just use a Dewalt in a sterile bag?

              They like to pretend it’s more than that, but anything that requires power really just boils down to carpentry that bleeds.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well not only has Hollywood lied to us again, I now feel 10 times more horrified about this story.

    • tpihkal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I was thinking this as well. Headlines, no matter the story, are frequently meant to rage bait people.

      Is it pretty messed up? Yeah, I’d say that meets the definition. Was the guy actually in danger? Idk? I’m not a rocket scientist.

      Edit: Side note, I just saw a “cranial fixation system” for the first time where I work about a week ago. I do not work in a medical field so this is just a really strange coincidence. I won’t be elaborating on my career.

    • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Whilst this is absolutely true, I think it’s more constructive to focus on the failure in design that led to the confusion in the cockpit.

      There is no doubt that children in the cockpit contributed to the incident, but that incident could have happened with some other distraction.

      The failure for the aircraft to correctly notify the pilot of the change in autopilot configuration was clearly very dangerous.

      • anton2492@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Agreed. “Mistakes were made - but let’s blame the dumb dad who had his moron 15-year-old progeny bump the autopilot into total submission.” smh

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 months ago

    These are the policies of take-your-daughter-to-work day. The doctor’s hands were tied.

  • giriinthejungle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 months ago

    I missed this in the news, then saw link refers to Kronen Zeitung report which is not a great newspaper to cite so thought for sure it cannot be entirely true? But it is! And here another link from Die Presse (google translate works fine here) which tells us it was not a jerk dad who brought his kid to drill holes but an idiot mom.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      4 months ago

      The article said the operation was completed without issue, so sounds good to me.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        It said “the operation was said to have gone off without issue, the patient is still unable to work”. Who is saying it didn’t have issues though? If the patient still isn’t able to work, it sounds potentially like there may have potentially been issues. It may have actually not had issues, but I’m not taking the surgeon or hospital’s word for it, assuming it is them who said this.

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          4 months ago

          With a serious head injury you ain’t going back to work in the morning. Not defending the surgeon, but the guy probably might never work again because of the injury. Hell, his whole personality might be changed because of it. And there is no way to know how the operation might have turned out or not.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Oh, for sure. It doesn’t say how long it’s been though. I’m just saying don’t take the word if a person who hid the fact they had a child drill into someone’s skull. There’s really no way to know how it went.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 months ago

      Did she get paid?

      Or is this yet another case of a minor being exploited for unpaid labor.

  • Beaver
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    When the hands on experience goes too far

      • Kimjongtooill@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        4 months ago

        Allowing a literal child with 0 medical training/education to drill into/near a vital organ of someone experiencing an acute head injury while they are unconscious and without their consent? Naw, nothing wrong there at all.

        • Francisco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well, I’m not a brain surgeon. So, I don’t take myself as qualified to make that risk assessment. I agree that all you said up to ‘without consent’ is a very reasonable starting point to think about it, the answer to it should be made by whomever is qualified to answer it.

          As for consent, no pacirnt gives direct consent to who’s in/helping the surgery besides the head surgeon. Why do you claim its need in this case?

          • Kimjongtooill@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            There is a trauma surgeon in the article stating she shouldn’t have even been allowed in the room, let alone allowed to drill into a patient’s skull.

            Is it less ethical or more ethical if the patient had given informed consent?

            No patient gives consent to who is helping in the surgery because there is an implicit understanding that it will only be performed by qualified licensed personnel. There are multiple regulating bodies that prevent unqualified people from practicing in a professional setting. So, it is not unreasonable to make this assumption.

            My argument is that it would be one thing if this was a simple superficial elective surgery where the patient consented to allowing the doctor’s unqualified child “to give it a go” popping a pimple or something. It is significantly worse because it was a life-threatening emergency procedure where the doctor elected to increase the likelihood of failure/harm/death while the patient was in a position where they couldn’t consent to the doctor taking that unnecessary risk.

        • Francisco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I too like to partake into cynical sarcastic self loathing , at times.

          And I do like the layered ambiguity to whom your comment is addressed.

      • HikingVet
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sounds like you’ve had brain surgery by a 13 year old.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Obviously it was take your kid to work day. Really it’s no different than letting them fly the plane, drive the Amtrak train, or run the hose on the riot police truck during a riot.

      (I’ll let you figure out which one of those examples is real)

  • ILikeBoobies
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Lucky, I didn’t get to drill holes during take your kid to work day

    • Zozano@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If your father was a porn star, then this was a good call.