The US barely has any rail network. We should have built high speed cross country trains by this point. But lobbyists.
The US has a relationship with trains that’s quite different from many other countries due to its history. For example in Germany a passenger train will have priority over a freight train, but in the US it’s the other way around. That has many consequences.
I’m not knowledgeable on the topic, it’s just a little thing I know.
deleted by creator
We don’t even have reliable power in large parts of the US. Not sure we’ll be getting eletricified train infrastructure anytime in our lifetimes.
deleted by creator
I did not compare it to India. I was using reliable power (which far and significantly more Americans care about than reliable public transport) as an analog for an example of our priorities. Since we clearly care about reliable power and cannot get it right, the likelihood in my mind that we’ll fix public transport in our lifetimes is next to zero without serious cultural and governmental change. Also, India is not comparable to America without looking at a brevity of complex factors like population size, density, and wealth. It’d be wise not to genuinely compare the two on any singular issue as you’ll set yourself up for multiple substantive arguments regardless your position. IE: if you’re looking through a 2 billion person sized lens, you’ll be able to find examples to support most viewpoints. Additionally your anecdotal evidence for the US being a bastion of reliability disregards the impoverished areas of the US that do not meet your preconceived notions.
@Ptsf If you aren’t interested in the comparison of the US and India it is probably a bad idea to comment in a thread about that topic.
More American’s should care about public transport. It actually delivers personal freedom that y’all give so much lip service to.
👌 not sure why you’re subscribing me to certain things or trying to argue. I like public transport, I’m just being realistic. One worker bee doesn’t control the hive.
@Ptsf Sorry, I was reading more into your comment.
I was reading it as: <technical reason> thus electrification wont happen
But I think now it was: <example of US dysfunction> thus electrification wont happenIs that more of what you were intending?
deleted by creator
