• netvor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    To me it feels fake.

    Especially the description sounds like a teenager is trying to build up tension in a story. Real people don’t talk like that.

    To be honest, the text somehow manages to even more forced and photoshopped than the actual photo (which probably is shopped as well.)

    (Edit: I realized I have red shift enabled on my screen so I’m probably totally unfair to the photo.)

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      there’s yellow paint and an indent on the back of the car, in the path of the bollard, which looks quite real to me and feels like a lot of effort to go into for an internet post

      edit: now that i think about it some more, and look closer, i’m gonna wager that they did really hit the bollard and maybe fucked up the car, but they then posed things to fake the bollard going through the car. It’s convenient how the first photo hides the base of the bollard and the area where it would pierce the car, and the second one could quite easily be two separate photos with the middle of the bollard erased to match the outline of the car’s rear.

      • lunarul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        That would be a lot of effort for a very high quality fake. In both pictures you can see the whole bottom of the trunk was raised up by the bollard poking through.

    • Bobmighty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The photo could be real. I’ve seen things like that in person. The story is dumb teenage bullshit like you say though.