• jcit878@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    it wouldn’t cover the opportunity cost of 3-4 hours a day for me, and while commuting direct costs are about 4% of my wage, that means a 4% incentive to lose 15-20 hours a week. absolutely not enough for me and to be honest I would consider it a disrespectful insult if my employer tried to justify that

    • zephyreks
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Real question, why did you take a job that required a 3-4 hour commute?

      • jcit878@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        because all the work is in the city for my career. and thats 3-4 hours return, not each way. many people do that here

        • zephyreks
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Damn, that sucks. I guess there’s no option to live closer within budget or a competent train service?

          • jcit878@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            not really. cost of housing is huge here. plus i like where i live and the kids all have schools established etc. its only a day or 2 a week i need to commute so its managable at least, but pre covid it was getting unbearable