• SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    Is there a significant impact on performance? It’s entirely possible that the RAM was overspecced before.

      • DebatableRaccoon
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        This is Nvidia we’re talking about. Lowered prices isn’t a tactic in those scumbags’ wheelhouse

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        It’s not worse if it doesn’t perform any differently. Besides, you don’t actually know the BOM cost.

        • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          If it was overspecced before, then that means it was using parts more expensive than it needed to. Nobody makes RAM that is slower and also more expensive for the same capacity. Logically, this should translate to lowered prices for the GPUs using the cheaper parts.

            • filister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              20 days ago

              Honestly NVIDIA shareholders don’t give a shit about the discrete GPU market as long as NVIDIA is able to overcharge the datacenters and reek of insane profits.

              Unfortunately, the crypto boom normalised those prices and now there is no turning back.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            20 days ago

            For all we know, they used overspecced RAM because it was what was available in the quantities needed, or they got a good price from the supplier - which is something that has specifically happened with hardware I’ve worked on before. Again, we don’t actually know the specific pricing details. Higher speed does not inherently mean higher cost.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            19 days ago

            You’re not paying for the discrete parts. You’re not gonna desolder that RAM and use it for something else.

            • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              No but I am paying for the accumulation of those parts no? Otherwise I’m not buying hardware.

              And we know shoe on the other foot, if there was no performance increase, but a fancy marketing label, they’d be all over increasing the price for it.

              • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                19 days ago

                You’re paying for the overall performance of the product, not for specs of each discrete component by itself.

                Yes, you also pay for whatever they decide is relevant to marketing.

                • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  19 days ago

                  How is buying hardware based on specs not doing both?

                  To that end, that’s like saying apple doesn’t need to offer higher base specs on things like ssds and internal storage because the performance is the same.