65 percent believe army punishment is enough for reserve officers accused of sexual assault at Sde Teiman prison

Since Israel’s war on Gaza began in October, many Palestinians detained by Israeli forces have said they were sexually abused by troops at Sde Teiman.

However, no one had been arrested for the abuse until 29 July, when military police raided the facility, clashed with the soldiers and took them into custody.

On Sunday, the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) revealed that 65 percent of Israeli Jews thought that the five should be punished only by the army and not face criminal charges.

The same INSS poll on Sunday also revealed that 47 percent of Israeli Jews believed Israel should not obey international law during the course of the current war in Gaza.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    57·
    4 months ago

    Prison rape is part of Israel’s genocide of Palestinians.

    Makes sense that the majority of colonizers support it.

    Zionism is a cancer on Judaism.

  • cygnus
    215·
    4 months ago

    65 percent believe army punishment is enough for reserve officers accused of sexual assault at Sde Teiman prison

    Clickbait title. The acceptability of this depends on the severity of military punishment.

      • cygnus
        51·
        4 months ago

        Do you have a source for that? It isn’t mentioned in this article, but if true, that’s completely unacceptable. Add them to the Hague’s list.

          • cygnus
            161·
            4 months ago

            Thanks for the source. Walking away without any repercussions is not acceptable, even if the five still under remand were really the main perpetrators.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
              31·
              4 months ago

              I sincerely doubt the five of them will even face repercussions. If any of them do it will be to save face for the media. The rape abuse has been reported on for months and only when the story got picked up by the UN did israel start pretending they cared.

              Israeli military court is infamous for letting soldiers off with war crimes against Palestinians if they just claim it was self-defense (fun fact the lawyers of the soldiers actually claimed it was self-defense)

    • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      62·
      4 months ago

      The acceptability of this depends on the severity of military punishment.

      How often does an occupying army censure its soldiers for harming the people being occupied? The occupation is meant to be harmful.

       

      The articles further report that the Army’s inquiry concluded that eighteen U.S. soldiers committed war crimes ranging from murder and assault to dereliction of duty. However, not one of the soldiers, even of those still on active duty at the time of the investigation, was ever court martialed in connection with the heinous crimes.

      https://www.historynewsnetwork.org/article/the-vietnam-war-crimes-you-never-heard-of

        • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          42·
          4 months ago

          Did the people who actually ordered that mistreatment get punished, or merely the people that carried out the orders?

          That’s a rhetorical question, we know the answer. Get better at cherrypicking, you found sour plums.

           

          I understand that you feel honour-bound to stick up for the groups you identify as. As an American, I assume? Perhaps as an ex-service member, or as someone related to people in that field. And, likely, as a human. Please understand that I’m not interested. I am heavily autistic. Emotional attachment is rare for me, and instead I interpret things more factually. I do not emotionally attach to the label of human, and I am not motivated to invent reasons to defend humanity as being likely to achieve great moral success. The facts indicate that humans are not doing so. If you wish to change my mind on this, I would be very pleased to see all children fed. They are innocent, after all, and people generally agree they should not be neglected. All I ask is for those moral preferences to be acted on, to the benefit of all living beings.

          • cygnus
            31·
            4 months ago

            As an American, I assume? Perhaps as an ex-service member, or as someone related to people in that field.

            Wrong on all counts. I really don’t know what to say to the rest of your comment, other than I agree that the behaviour of a person towards others — especially strangers — is the best indicator of their character.