• jonne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    How about you just stop doing car chases and endangering everyone?

    During a pursuit in West Memphis, Arkansas, a state trooper attempted a tactical vehicle immobilization technique known as a PIT maneuver twice in attempts to stop a fleeing Tesla Model Y, but both times the vehicle accelerated out of reach and was only stopped after driving over a tire-deflation device.

    Yeah, great idea, pushing a car into a spin while at high speed could never go wrong. Turns out just calling ahead and blocking the road is the thing that actually works.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    26 days ago

    Seems like these chases are the very definition of ones you need to call off before someone gets killed. If a car is out-accelerating an already fast police car, you’re already endangering everyone around

  • 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    25 days ago

    There is a solution to this:

    1. Witness offense

    2. Take picture/video of offense with numberplate visible

    3. Send ticket via mail

    4. Collect fine via bank transfer

    5. (Profit) be done with it.

  • Iceblade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    No need. If they’re going that fast, just put a chopper on them and pick them up when they run out of juice. Shouldn’t be too long.

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      While the chopper follows the dummy, do the real heist and make a clean getaway.

      Did nobody watch 2 Fast 2 Furious?

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    I’m surprised they didn’t just require manufacturers to install acceleration limiters and remote kill switches. Hopefully they never do.

    • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      Speed limiters on commercial trucks already exist. They could be applied to private cars too. Not sure why, on public roads, there is much of a reason to drive 100 miles per hour. Many cars can go beyond that.

      I agree about a remote kill switch. That has too high a potential to be abused. A limiter though, one that was fixed and not variable based on anything, would be fine I think.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      I would 100% support electronic speed limiters and acceleration limiters on public roads.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          There are probably 1000x more situations where you accelerate into a crash, rather than out of one. Slow cars are safe cars.

          • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            25 days ago

            Just chiming in to say I see your point. Slower cars allow for more reaction time, and therefore safer reactions.

      • frozenpopsicle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        if that was the law how would you enforce it in any meaningful way? People would overide/not have them.

        Well we’d just force them! How!!?! Mechanically minded people mod cars everyday. Then police would have more reason to F with everyone at their pleasure. You would for sure need more surveillance from the state. Probably need more expensive proprietary anti-consumer tech inside the car you own.

        Do you know why I pulled you over? Your car transponder isn’t transmitting properly.

        Do you see what you want unleashed?

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          if that was the law how would you enforce it in any meaningful way?

          Through the OEM. Wouldn’t be hard to create a system that tracks location locally using GPS and electronically applies an according speed limit from a govt database

          Acceleration is a simple matter of distance/time/time.

          Mechanically minded people mod cars everyday.

          People break all sorts of laws every day. It doesn’t mean you don’t bother making them.

          Then police would have more reason to F with everyone at their pleasure.

          Actually they’d have less, considering cars would be physically incapable of speeding.

          You would for sure need more surveillance from the state. Probably need more expensive proprietary anti-consumer tech inside the car you own.

          …for what?

  • daqu@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    25 days ago

    The cops need suicide drones to make killing people in electric cars safe again.