Lemmy.ca
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
FenrirIII@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 9 months ago

Exploited rule

slrpnk.net

message-square
45
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
870

Exploited rule

slrpnk.net

FenrirIII@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 9 months ago
message-square
45
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/12045095

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Reminder that every dollar possessed by the ultrawealthy is time you wouldn’t have had to spend working and could have instead used that time to enrich your personal life whether it’s alone, with family, or friends.

    • I'll be on [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      9 months ago

      And to help illustrate your important reminder, a (probably now outdated) visualisation of just how many dollars they actually posses:

      https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/

      • Johnmannesca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Outdated sure, but captivating nonetheless

        • I'll be on [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Yeah, it’s mindboggling as it is, but when you know how much more money the richest few people have made since it was last updated (the world’s five richest men have more than doubled their fortunes to $869bn since 2020), or how much all of the world’s billionaires are hoarding combined (2,781 billionaires with a total net wealth of $14.2 trillion - the pixel site only goes up to 3.2 trillion), or that this trend isn’t going anywhere or slowing down, it really is overwhelming.

      • EvolvedTurtle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is really cool

        • I'll be on [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Glad you found it helpful/interesting!

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The minimum wage should grow with inflation according to an annual review. It’s an injustice that there must be this huge battle every time it needs to be increased every few years but only when people get fed up because they can’t afford to live.

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t need no stinkin’ government getting involved in my business trying to… Get me more money. Same as when that Obama tried to save me money on healthcare. Don’t tread on me!

      • stembolts@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        .

      • Clent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Don’t tread on me being treaded on!

      • technomad@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      The minimum wage should grow with inflation according to an annual review.

      Pretty much how it’s handled in Australia, although they sometimes increase it above inflation. Importantly, it’s handled by an independent body and not something that is subject to votes in parliament.

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      So if industrialists could manage inflation while increasing productivity, they should keep all the gains?

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        We’d have a different system in an ideal world but I’m not commenting on that now.

        • Jerkface (any/all)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m not sure you get the point I am making. You changed something, perhaps without noticing. The quote is about productivity, not inflation. Merely keeping pace with inflation when productivity is booming hardly seems enough.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            If you think productivity should be factored in that’s fine, but I’m not talking about productivity like the post is. I purposely left it out. I’m merely saying that wages should keep up with inflation at the very least.

  • julysfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    “BuT tHeN i WoUlD bE mAkInG lEsS cOmPaRaTiVeLy”

    Yes, that’s the point, everyone should be making more.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    To make their line go up, they must make your line go down.

    • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not necessarily.

      Increases in productivity could have been split between labor and capital, giving benefits to both. (Or even better, gone just to labor, but that would not be a “both lines go up” scenario.)

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yes. I was referring to how capitalism tended to have worked in the past decade or so, and not to how to actually make the line go up.

        E: autocorrect

  • thatsnothowyoudoit
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    Should be much higher.

    A combination of inflation, gap between workers and leaders at the company AND productivity.

    50$/hr and 3 day weeks. There’s no reason to grind to make the ruling class more wealthy.

  • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    According to my father in law it’s the participation trophies that are to blame.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Could I please get a source for this? I want to post it in the break room at work.

    • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      data:

      https://www.bls.gov/productivity/charts/

      article search “wage gap”:

      https://usafacts.org/articles/what-is-labor-productivity-and-how-has-it-changed-in-the-us-over-time/

      That happened when Ronnie Reagan was president.

      Of course I can’t read it for you, too.

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        You rock

  • sudo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Holy fuck the Gravel Institute is a nostalgia trip. Can’t believe those kids still have a job.

    • rodneylives@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      They’re back? Oh please oh please oh please…

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Even just accounting for inflation, the $1.25/h federal minimum wage in 1963 would be about $13/h today.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is this super outdated?

  • Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    The federal minimum wage was $1 per hour in 1960, so productivity has increased 23 fold according to the OP.

    Shouldn’t this mean we should be able to cut down to two hours of work per week?

    Having to work 40+ hours when 2 should be enough does sound like exploitation.

    • workerONE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I should only have to get out of bed once for every 23 mornings that I wake up, am I right?

  • Noodle07@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Can’t exploit me if I’m unemployed, checkmate capitalists

    • mriormro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m pretty sure rents have gone up at more than double that number. Giving our shrinking wage even less worth.

  • Rolivers@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Really? Not more?

    Edit. Oh I see, back then minimum wage was about $1.15. Lol. Yeah a 23x increase seems reasonable.

    • RedditRefugee69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Probably regionally dependent. $23 in the Midwest but $50 in the big cities

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Capital statement

Work Reform@lemmy.world

workreform@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

  • All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
  • Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
  • Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
  • We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

  • Higher wages for underpaid workers.
  • Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
  • Better and fewer working hours.
  • Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
  • Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 8 users / day
  • 1.44K users / week
  • 1.96K users / month
  • 10.7K users / 6 months
  • 222 local subscribers
  • 11.9K subscribers
  • 1.11K Posts
  • 20.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • seeCseas@lemmy.world
  • tintory@lemm.ee
  • TinMod@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org