In the wake of a Chinese doping scandal, Michael Phelps doubled down Monday on his support for tougher sanctions — including a lifetime ban for anyone who tests positive for a banned substance.

“If you test positive, you should never be allowed to come back and compete again, cut and dry,” Phelps said. “I believe one and done.”

The World Anti-Doping Agency and World Aquatics have acknowledged that 23 Chinese swimmers tested positive for a banned substance ahead of the Tokyo Olympics. The results were not made public until media reports surfaced this year, with both bodies accepting the Chinese explanation that the positive tests were caused by tainted food.

Nine of those swimmers won medals - several as part of relay teams - n Paris, leading British star Adam Peaty to gripe that the playing field was not even.

  • Seraph@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    While interesting, I’m not convinced it would stop pressure from an athlete’s home country. Just increases the personal conflict against those pressures.

    Consider a 4 year ban for the country instead. Make it a serious offense.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you have a situation like Russia where there is a provable government doping program, agreed. But if an athlete makes the personal decision to use performance enhancers that happen to slip through the initial screening but then get caught by the Olympic testers, I wouldn’t hold that against the rest of the athletes from that country.

      • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I would. Well not against the individual athletes but against their country of origin. Countries screening would need to be better than the IOC ones or en par.

        The basic framing is: “your boss fucked up, you’re part of the fallout”.

        An alternative would be to allow all doping.

        But at the moment the approach is to reward the smartest cheaters and at least for me removed all interest for most sport events.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Just keep in mind, a lot of countries are not the US/Europe/China. There are small island nations and city states sending a number of athletes you can count with one hand. They many not have the technical/financial resources to pre-screen and rely only on the Olympics’ own testing process.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      How about lifetime for the athlete, 4 year for the country.

    • esc27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Make it 20 years, but only if it proven to be a team issue and not individual.

  • fpslem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    While we’re over-hauling doping punishments, we have to confront the deeply broken doping testing system and widespread contaminations of many foods and medications. The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and its country-level entities (UKADA, USADA, etc.) don’t like to talk about how laughably bad their systems are, and how often the pop false positives. It wasn’t as well known until cyclist Lizzy Banks challenged a false positive last year and spent €40,000 in legal fees and testing fees to get a “no fault or negligence” ruling. And that wouldn’t have been possible at all if Banks didn’t have a medical background (she went pro just before finishing a medical degree) and was able to read the faulty reports herself and challenge the claims of UKADA. Thanks to her, we now know that WAY more common foods and over-the-counter medications have contaminations with banned substances, which produces positive results with trace-amounts of banned substances.

    https://www.cyclingweekly.com/racing/i-felt-that-my-life-was-over-british-rider-reveals-nine-month-anti-doping-nightmare

    I’m all for cracking down on dopers and cheaters, so long as we fix the system so it doesn’t create false-positives.

    • commandar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The entire system is deeply corrupt beyond false positives.

      We know for a fact that Russia was systematically cheating testing and the grand sum of the punishment they faced for it was having to compete as “Olympic Athletes from Russia” for two years.

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not only should they get a lifetime ban, but every athlete should be tested 100% of the time. There is no reason why something as huge and prestigious as the Olympics, with the kind of money it brings in, should not be doing this.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Also randomly along the year when they are training and having to tell exacty where they are at all times (so no hiding away doping & flushing them out) , as cyclists are.

      Cyclism went so bad but now they’re tested really hard and often.

  • tourist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    What was that videogame, where if they caught you hacking, they wouldn’t ban you, they’d just put you in lobbies with other hackers?

    Imagine having an olympics where all the caught dopers compete against each other.

    But they’d probably, like, die or some shit. I’ll have to rethink this when I’m in my morning zone.

    Northern Lights is a great strain yall

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t care about the Olympics themselves (I think they’re important, I am just not personally interested in catching more than highlights), but I would watch the shit out of the Dope Olympics. Dude on steroids and cocaine throwing a javelin ten miles? I’d pay to watch that.

      Of course I’d also watch the Pitch-O-Mat 5000 fire balls at Wireless Joe Jackson, so I’m not anyone’s target audience except possibly Futurama’s from 20-odd years ago.

    • What was that videogame, where if they caught you hacking, they wouldn’t ban you, they’d just put you in lobbies with other hackers?

      Many games do that but GTA is easily the most popular/famous to do so. Though it hasn’t done that in a long, long time, that is how it worked at launch. You also got a little dunce hat, so you knew you fucked up.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      It would be highly unethical, but I do wonder how much faster you could go if you were allowed to take absolutely anything.

      See somebody run 100m in 8 seconds before their heart explodes. Watch a man lift a whole car before he shits his entire digestive system out of his body.

    • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      If they over-dope to compete in the dopers olympics and die as a result, that’s not any different than driving without a seatbelt or motorcycling without a helmet and dying as a result. If you don’t want to risk death you can just not be stupid.

      • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        True, I think a doping league is something we could try. We just have a year or 2 of ONLY doping league, then open the clean league and have 100 % controls. But not all doping is testable, currently…

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      That was GTA4

      I like the idea of Dopelympics. Let everyone participating be fully aware they’re in for the time of their (very short) lives

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think that the problem there would be that so many eyes would follow a full on doping Olympics that that’s where the money would also go. And there’s no way you could spin that sort of league/competition to be amateurs only like the Olympics is so it would have to be professional which means the best athletes would go there because they’d fucking get paid

      • bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        The Olympics haven’t been amateur for at least 30 years. Not only do professionals compete, but the country olympic committees usually pay competitors for winning a medal.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Fine and well, but coming from a gear-doping genetic freak created in a lab run by fish…

    I don’t really have an end to that, I just wanted to call him a gear-doping genetic freak created in a lab run by fish.

  • Pringles@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I believe in the Sun Tzu method. You are allowed to fuck up once. Fuck up again, off with the head (well, or a lifetime ban in this case). One and done would ruin too many careers with false positives or people that made a youthful fuck up.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not that I think it should be, but isn’t cannabis a banned substance? If so, doesn’t that apply to him?

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      Isn’t the idea of banning doping in the Olympics to deal with people using banned substances while actively competing? That is to say, even though Phelps uses weed, has he tested positive during an active competition for being on weed (or any other substance)?

      What competitors do in their off time is fine as far as I’m concerned. But if they’re using right before or during actively competing, then I can see where it’s a problem. No?

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Athletes who compete on an international level don’t have off time.
        They’re training year-round, and there’s a lot of performance enhancing drugs that speed up recovery during the training season. Faster recovery gives the athlete more time to train, which enhances their performance during competition.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          You do realize that no one can work literally all the time without time off, right? Olympians are super athletes, but they’re not superhuman.

          • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Ok, so he goes home at night, smokes a joint before bed, and is back in the gym the next day. Working year-round doesn’t mean you have zero free time.

          • superkret@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You do realize there are millions of people who train for their sport all year long? I’m one of them.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        In February 2009, a photograph of Phelps using a bong went viral; this resulted in the loss of Kellogg’s as a sponsor, as well as a three-month suspension by USA Swimming. Phelps admitted that the photo, which was taken at a party at the University of South Carolina, was authentic. He publicly apologized, calling his behavior “inappropriate”.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Phelps#Legal_issues

        USA Swimming is who selects people for the Olympics.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          5 months ago

          With all due respect, you are conflating what somebody does in their personal time with doing something to cheat in a sporting event (the topic at hand). Despite Phelps having made some poor social and legal choices, his stance on zero-tolerance to doping in sporting events is no less relevant. What you’re suggesting is a red herring.

          • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Literally Sha’Carri Richardson was banned from competing in the Tokyo Olympics by the US Anti-Doping Agency because she smoked weed to help cope with the death of her mother. You’re making a big deal arguing that something that really does actually happen doesn’t for some reason.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            5 months ago

            His choices were only poor because there are cooler drugs to do that don’t harm your lungs and heart.

            You need your lungs and heart, Phelps! Cardio is literally your career!

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              5 months ago

              He won 28 Olympic medals. He’s the most decorated Olympian of all time. I think his career was fine. But no random internet person tell us more about what Michael Phelps should have done to be a better swimmer. LOL.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Y’all know that doping usually refers to performance enhancing drugs right?

      • Swordgeek
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Wrong.

        Doping refers to deliberate use of compounds or procedures explicity banned by WADA, in some clearly-defined window around a competition.

        Pot is still on the list. End of story.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’d imagine microdosing cannabis could be performance enhancing in shooting sports, for example.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              5 months ago

              Despite what some weirdos think doping has a very specific colloquial definition. It indicates performance enhancing substances. Drugs that give you an edge in competition. As pot does not do that it’s clearly not the point. Everyone on Earth knows what Phelps is talking about here.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                14
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’ll just keep pasting this…

                In February 2009, a photograph of Phelps using a bong went viral; this resulted in the loss of Kellogg’s as a sponsor, as well as a three-month suspension by USA Swimming. Phelps admitted that the photo, which was taken at a party at the University of South Carolina, was authentic. He publicly apologized, calling his behavior “inappropriate”.[286]

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Phelps#Legal_issues

                USA Swimming selects American Olympic athletes.

    • cygnus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sort of… CBD isn’t, and anyway I imagine the exclusion of cannabis won’t be around much longer. There are many studies that show it has no impact on athletic performance.

      • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        CBD was unfortunately on the ban list when he got in trouble. It was only just removed a decade later in 2019.

        It’s also one of the few chemicals in cannabis that can affect performance, unlike THC which just bugs me. Like they are almost picking and choosing, purely to just be finicky

    • regrub@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think the window for the testing is what matters more. Whatever they do off-season is their business, as long as its not in their system during training and competition

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    This sports stuff is expensive and controversial. Just ban sports competition. Solves the drugs shit and the trans stuff.

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Don’t ban the competition, ban doping being illegal.

      The ratings would be through the roof to watch some freak with more drugs than blood run a sub 8 second 100m right before his heart explodes.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t think we should be promoting self harm for entertainment purposes.

        Don’t get me wrong, I would absolutely watch the Monster League game every Sunday, but it will guaranteed lead to huge swaths of athletes destroying their bodies for ratings. They already do this without destructive performance enhancers, we don’t need to encourage it to be worse.

  • Fleur__@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ehhhh I think there might be place for a little more subtlety. Someone who’s admitted to doing so probably doesn’t deserve to be banned from participating in a sport they probably love. And a hard line might encourage people to take the denial till death approach which can make things annoying

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I would say that rule should only apply to purposefully taking something for an unfair advantage to juke the competition, like most steroids.

      For the ones where the only reported reasoning is being harmful to the user or has a potential for abuse, I would say the decision be on a case by case basis.

      My reasoning is that there are also people who’ve turned their lives around and quit the substances in question. Being banned when you are fully “legit” would be extremely demotivational and can increase relapsing. It could also be controversial to one of the ideals of the Olympics; overcoming adversity to be the best you can be.

  • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    We’ve seen this time and time again. Banning things outright just doesn’t work. Regulation works.

    Also, almost every profession athlete uses steroids in some way or another.