The former president has always considered himself to be the ultimate disrupter. But this time, the disruption is on the other side.

Through the weekend, there were an awful lot of questions that were going back and forth from people in the presidentā€™s tightest circle, and one of the questions that kept being asked was whetherĀ Joe BidenĀ was going to endorseĀ Kamala HarrisĀ or not. And the question didnā€™t revolve around whetherĀ heĀ wanted to or not, but whether people in her camp thought it would be better for her to fight for it, win it on her own, and not be seen as somebody who was tapped by President Biden and so, in her own way, have a fresh startĀ going into the campaign.

So the timing seems to be about as good as it could have been to end what has just been one of the craziest two or three weeks in American politics in quite some time.

  • corsicanguppy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    Ā·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If they voted for Don over two made-up issues, theyā€™ll vote for Don over some new story. The GQP are attacking VP Harrisā€™ laugh, now. Do I need to go find a clip?

    If theyā€™re excusing all Donā€™s myriad misdeeds - THE MAN IS A FELON - over a stutter and a stumble, theyā€™ll believe anything.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      2 months ago

      The American independent voter is a puzzling thing. I think they vote based upon a great many non-issues tbh, but Biden old was an easy attack line and was a media classic, and removal of it will sway a non zero amount of voters.

      I mean people voted Obama then Trumpā€¦ and there is a non zero amount of people who voted Trump and then Biden. I wouldnā€™t be shocked if there wouldā€™ve been people that voted Trump then Biden that wouldā€™ve voted Trump again, and some of those could be swayed to Harris?

      For a laugh: https://youtu.be/KAG37Kw1-aw