• deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Performance benchmarks for mobile parts are meaningless without power consumption data.

    • Addv4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      True. If this is around a 30 watt tdp, it would have amazing power consumption numbers (for reference, they were comparing it to a 1070 max q, which could have a max tdp of 115 watts).

        • Addv4@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 month ago

          Even then, that is pretty impressive with a cpu and gpu together (sorry, haven’t looked at the newer cpu tdps in a bit, was thinking older mobile chips).

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I have an older 680m in my laptop and it performs pretty well with a combined package power of under 45 watts. Usually the last 10% comes at like 50% increased power consumption so that may be where the 35-65 watt range comes from, but the final performance shouldn’t be too far off.

    • taanegl@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I can guarantee you that with a Radeon running at full speed, it isn’t going to be long. But seeing a browser time benchmark would be nice.

    • Audacious@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I always calculate performance /( TDP * price) when looking at new relevant PC parts, something most reviewers don’t bother doing.

  • cygnus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    I guess this is a sign that I need to update my rig…

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Huh… So an integrated GPU now performs better than my GTX 1060 6GB?

    Considering that I can still play games reasonably comfortably on my 1060 I find it pretty impressive.

    Though… This is likely also writing on the wall for me to upgrade… At some point… Though honestly I dint feel like I’m really being limited by my GPU yet. The 1060 6GB is a pretty legendary card.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      1060 gang represent!

      I was a bit worried because the new FFXIV expansion bought a new graphics engine with it, but if anything it performs even better than the old one.

      If I want to play something with modern graphics, that’s what my PS5 is for. The Talos Principle 2 demo made the 1060 cry, and obviously anything with raytracing is out.

      I think the best thing you can do if you’ve got an older card is make sure you’ve got a GSync/FreeSync/VRR monitor for it, so those bits where it chugs down from 60fps go to a more manageable 40-50fps rather than skipping or tearing frames. I find I don’t mess with graphics settings as much either.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The only recent game I’ve played that made my GPU cry was cyberpunk. But in the beginning that game was also a mess and now runs pretty decently.

        Thing is with modern day AAA games, considering what unoptimised messes they’re released in, I can’t be sure if the issues are with my card or the game being shite.

        But to be honest… I don’t play that many AAA games anymore. The majority of them are incredibly uninteresting to me, are riddled with live service garbage, or are generally all pretty graphics and no substance.

  • cevn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    This rly interesting. I have the 780m and it seems sufficient for most games at 60fps but this could help push me up to 120 or 90.

    • And009@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Was hoping to build a pc, the gpu shit show kept me away for years. Maybe a laptop would do.

        • And009@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I do plan to buy a mac m4 max machine for work, I’m guessing the performance drop would be ok to play titles like cyberpunk on medium high. Good enough

      • cevn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have system76 but cant rly recomend cuz the touchpad is not great and charging situation is bad. Thinking framework hopefully they land this hardware.

        • And009@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Hoping xbox and ps switch to ARM for next gen. We’ll have AAA games running on mobile in half a decade maybe

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Where is the point? One is a dedicated GPU, the other is an integrated graphics engine. One is for gamers (or was many years ago), the other for people using Word or Excel.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think the point is, it doesn’t have to just be for Excel anymore.

      I can actually play hunt showdown on my 13" Ryzen framework laptop. That’s insane. This is saying it’ll be a lot better on the upcoming chips, that’s even more insane.

    • Schmuppes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m still rocking my Vega 56 on my main rig and now have to realize that it will soon be less powerful than AMD’s iGPUs. Damn.

  • Omega_Jimes
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s actually an amazing achievement considering how popular the 1070/1650 are.