• hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s just journalism in the internet age. Its a pile on for clicks. However, they still make a good point, in a slightly indifferent way, updated for the most current information.

    Your comment did neither, so should we consider you astroturfing?

    • remotelove
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      You can consider me as anything you want. Your perogative.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yep, but usually in a discussion the whole point is for you to express your view in a way that makes it clear, rather than leaving it up to me to decide. Your perogative.

        • remotelove
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I used short, simple sentences so my point should have been clear.

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, you used rhetorical questions, which leave interpretation up to the reader and are not a statement by design.

            Language is hard. Being a good person is harder. Making an effective point is tricky too. You’ll need to work on them all.

            Your point wasn’t very u clear. Worse than that. It was dull.

            • remotelove
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Have you seen the volume of this shit? It’s the quantity of the same rehashed narrative that is pissing me off.

              That is about as clear as it gets.

              • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                That is not your original comment. That is 3 comments deep, 2 for you, lol.

                Again, you missed the point about there being similar articles for a popular news story and that this one was updated with the latest information, therefore relevant.

                Your comment was neither incisive nor helpful. Your commenting is neither friendly nor understanding. Nor do you seek to learn, so I wonder why you even bother to comment. Your comments are the same detritus you complain about.

                • remotelove
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  “Nether incisive nor helpful” / “Friendly nor understanding”

                  Neutral is the word you should be using. Zero emotion. There is nothing I could say that would make you change your opinion, and vice versa.

                  On that, you were looking too deep into all of this. After that last paragraph of what seems to be insults, I really don’t care about your opinion now.

                  • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    No, abrasive is more accurate. You probably think its neutral, but it isn’t. That’s the point. Youre being critical of people explaining to you what you clearly don’t understand.