• Tubbles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      After having distro hopped for over 10 years ive settled on manjaro xfce and been happily running it for roughly five years now. It works very well out of the box, comes with working support for nvidia and steam being preinstalled. It strikes a very good balance between latest bleeding edge and just works, a position where it is bound to sometimes make some mistakes. But I’ve never noticed any issues. I can fully recommend it, it seems like most people that give it hate comes from memes or have never tried it themselves

      • NateSwift@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re happy with it there isn’t one.

        Lots of people see it as a handful of config options of Arch with its own less stable package repository

      • SyJ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It has massive stability options and the support from the devs is poor, one of them openly said that if users can’t fix their broken systems they shouldn’t update them.

    • Sharp312@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used it for a while, never had an issue. im on base arch now but ngl manjaro had the best gnome implementation I’ve ever seen

    • Spiracle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was an often-recommended distro a couple of years ago. When SteamOS 3 was on the horizon, some people recommended it as probably the closest to SteamOS 3 on the market. Now, I haven’t bothered uninstalling it on my old computer yet.

    • Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      People who Googled arch linux for dummies and realized even that was too complicated and then proceeded to install an arch based distro just to get AUR.

  • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably more and more people buying Steam Deck lately. That’s the nr. 1 purchase I’ve made last year for me.

  • metaStatic@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just switched to Pop OS from Windows. I’ve been doing this since Red Hat 5.1 and I finally think all the things that kept pulling me back to windows have been solved and for edge cases Windows in Virtual box seems to just run faster anyway

    • MJBrune@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Too bad that there isn’t any reasonable way to get virtual box to run modern games. I’ve thought about a pcie pass through but then I question why even have Linux in the first place if I am just going to install windows over it?

      • metaStatic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I might multiboot windows if anything doesn’t like virtual box but every game I play works fine on linux so far

  • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn’t be surprised if Mac usage is slumping hugely.

    I’m a Mac user and previously used Steam quite a bit. But can’t since upgrading to an M1 as Valve hasn’t compiled any of its games to be 64-bit compatible

    • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      FYI you can run the Windows version of Steam through Apple’s Game Porting Toolkit (or crossover-wine). I do that on my M2, works pretty well. It’s just like the old Linux days haha

      • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for the head up. I use Parallels at the moment, which works well enough. Haven’t looked into the toolkit, but will do.

  • firecat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    “According to these new numbers from Valve”

    That means the numbers are fake, just like Elon followers. People please do your research and not trust sources that control the numbers.

    • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That means the numbers are fake,

      What? Them (phoronix) disclosing the source or valve releasing any numbers at all?

      People please do your research and not trust sources that control the numbers.

      How would that even work? Where would I get the numbers?

    • alessandro
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Deliver fake data would be an insanely dangerous game from Valve: that data is what all their partner to make strategic choices… if there’s any proof of that, all their partner would drop the ball and Valve would lose it’s multi billion business in just few weeks.

      1. fake that data is plain stupid too: Valve has all the interest to know and share where is the bigger pie piece… so Capcom, Sega, Blizzard etc. can tune their product. For example, let’s say Valve goes crazy and say that the GPU Nvidia RTX 5090Ti got 50% of market share… and all their partner follow this fake data and deliver all their products with no optimizations: results for their customers? (and, before any one mention it: yes, this apply the opposite: if Valve say 50% of GPU market share are shitty old Intel iGPU… all future games on PC will overly tuned towards the lowest end and big publisher won’t even bother trying with next gen videogames).
      • firecat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thats a very specific event that doesnt apply to cheap companies who overwork their employees and are using Unreal Engine most of the time.