At issue is the NATO two per cent doctrine. That calls for NATO nations to spend two per cent of their GDP on defence.

American politicians, along with retired Canadian generals and Ottawa think tanks who receive funding from the arms industry, have used that to hammer Canada as a failure on defence.

Defence Minister Bill Blair has recounted how hard it is to try to convince cabinet as well as Canadians about the need to meet the two per cent commitment because “nobody knows what that means.”

Add to that mix the current fiscal environment and ongoing concerns from Canadians who have been struggling financially. Directing tens of billions of tax dollars into more tanks, submarines and fighter jets isn’t a top priority among Canadian families.

  • Beaver
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    Tax the rich more so that we can hit that 2% requirement.

    Then we can adequately support Ukraine.

    • pipsqueak1984
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      We don’t have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem. We don’t need more taxes. We could tax away the entirety of the wealth of our richest citizens and it’d only cover our federal+provincial deficits for 2-3 decades at most.

      Something structural with our spending needs to change.

      • McLoud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The people downvoting you like paying high taxes and having a government that wastes billions of dollars apparently.

  • Grant_M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    We need to build up in case of a trump win in the US. He may well order US military action against Canada.

    • Beaver
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, we need to remain strong in the face of the fascists who would gladly betray Canada.

      • Grant_M
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        We do. And, they will if given the opportunity.

        • m0darn
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I agree that force is the only language fascists understand, But what would preparing Canada for a US invasion look like?

          • Grant_M
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            No matter how much equipment we purchased, it wouldn’t be enough. We would go down fighting. Half of the people here are so brainwashed, they’d be more likely to team up with the trump/putin alliance than defend Canada. It looks bad.

            • m0darn
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              We need to build up in case of a trump win in the US. He may well order US military action against Canada.

              No matter how much equipment we purchased, it wouldn’t be enough.

              So how much should we build up? Or did you mean build up international alliances?

              • Grant_M
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Both. We can build up enough to fight back with allies.

                • m0darn
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  We would not get state level military support from any ally. China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, and Cuba might help us.

                  The type of build up that would be effective (if it could even be called that) against a US invasion would be sapping roads and bridges like Switzerland, and transforming our army into a resistance/insurgency force. Should we re allocate our spending towards these aims?

                  It seems a little premature.

                  Maybe we should actually invest in helping Canadians (and Americans) engage with and value democracy and human rights.