• stevestevesteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why I haaaate “today I learned” posts sourced from a cheesy interview. Some exaggerated or even sarcastic statement gets spun into absolute truth and it’s pervasive

    • solstice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A ton of times these high profile people will be giving a press conference or an impromptu interview to whoever and they take a ton of rapid fire questions. So many times someone will slip in a question like ‘do you think the end scene was symbolic of the protagonists suppressed desire to felate their grandma wearing a strapon?’ and they’re like ‘uh yeah sure I mean if you want to interpret it that way I guess’ then move on. Then the next day you see stories like ‘such and such actor said he wants to fuck his grandma’ and then it spirals from there. I just ignore pretty much everything I read these days tbh.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pearl Jam said they got their name from psychedelic jelly one of their grandmothers used to make. That seemed to stick for years. Later they clarified that it was just a joke but the grandmother’s name was in fact Pearl.

    • atticus88th@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      My theory is that it only needs be true once on a TIL and then the rest of the internet will believe it to be true.

  • thorbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You wrote the movie? Well, I wrote the comment saying you’re wrong.

    Checkmate!

      • Gorilladrums@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How rotten does your mind have to be to think this partisan culture war bullshit? The simplest and most obvious explanation is that media outlets like this pump out fake and misleading content for the sake of stoking controversy which gets them more clicks and views, and thus more money

      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        can be romantic

        It isn’t “CAN BE”.

        … it is “THEY ARE whether they want to or not, and I even have fake proof to prove it, regardless of what the actual writer says.”

        • BrandoGil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s… Very not true. Aside from the post here having verified their source (it’s just that the source is wrong) Decider is owned by the New York Post which is very much not liberal.

          • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            Companies like NYP care about money more than anything else. If all the money was being help by the LBG community, you better believe that they would be all over that.

            • BrandoGil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s not the point you made that was refuted. You attempted to use the post as an example of liberal media pushing a narrative and you were wrong. I’m not here to argue anything else.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I once got into what I would advise my younger self against was an argument about an aspect of Lord of the Rings and I quoted Tolkien himself to prove my point and the guy I was arguing with said, “what does he know? He only wrote it.”

    • Smallletter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of people swear by this whole “death of the author” philosophy because it let’s them ignore the literal stated intent of the author in favor of whatever pet theory they have. Which is fine, but you can’t use it in a debate about theories about the work. There isn’t a right answer to what you want to believe, but there often IS a right answer to what the actual author actually intended, especially modern authors in the age of information.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t remember it very well. Something to do with whether or not LOTR was influenced by Christian mythology.

  • Graphine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it just me, or do more and more women seem to have this obsession with lesbians in movies? More specifically lesbian romance.

    Maybe I’m seeing things with different glasses. So help me out here. Something has just changed over the years.

    • SomeoneElse@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s probably just because people can be more openly gay now than they used to and they want representation in the media they consume. You couldn’t demand lesbian media without outing yourself before.

    • Pokethat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I might get a lot of flack for this, but I do think there is a growing want to be somewhere in the rainbow spectrum because it is seen as “in” right now. If you belong somewhere on that group you are more interesting, more special. At least that’s the, subtle and sometimes not so subtle, sentiment I’m sentiment.

      • Graphine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Honestly I do agree.

        I’m not dismissing the fact that there are legitimate homosexuals and whatnot. But it does kind of feel like being in that spectrum is seen as the “hit” right now. Like this special group. Especially in teens.

        Of course I could be terribly wrong but maybe…nowadays it feels like being straight or not in that group is seen as a bad thing. Like if you’re straight, you’re actually bi and just in the closet.

        Maybe as time goes on and being LGBT becomes seen as a normal part of society (which it will) it won’t be so frowned upon whether or not you’re straight, or in that spectrum. I just think we should be accepting of either orientation or gender instead of pushing a specific agenda.

        • funkless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          on the other hand, I self ID’d as straight for 35 years until I felt safe not to do so. So it looked like I just appeared in the early 2020s

      • Gorilladrums@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The vast majority of the LGBTAH3DIAH$AHEISHW++™ shit is nothing more than a fad. You can see this in the polls. Every poll that comes out says that this community doubles every year, but when you actually look at the figures, the percentage of people who are genuinely LGBT is pretty low and it been relatively stable for decades. The new increases are in bullshit labels like “queer”, “questioning”, or some other shit like that. There’s no meaning to them and there’s no other point besides straight young people making up or misusing terms to seems cool, special, and unique to fit in.

        • Pokethat@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s a bit ridiculous how the pride flag was meant to show that humanity is on a spectrum of all kinds of sexualities in different amounts. But then the attention people wanted to start adding extra widgets, shapes, and colors to the flag that was supposed to represent basically everyone (or at least the non 100% straight people, depends on interpretation).

          Go to the hood and tell a black dude walking around at two am that he has his own representation on the pride rev. d flag, right between the stripes for asexual and native Americans or whatever, and see what happens.

    • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is being pushed more and more in the media… this is a perfect example. Simply making up shit all to hook a certain demographic.

      Back in the 80s, we had tons of tacked-on romantic interests added to movies for no good reason. Some action movie where the world is nearly obliterated, everyone you know is dead and a whole space army is chasing you - sure find a hiding spot and bang the girl you saved 2 hours earlier. Totally makes a ton of sense. These days certain people in the media are trying to push another narrative but it is just as tacked-on and cringy.

      It is especially ridiculous when the characters and the movie have nothing to do with romance.

    • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not in my experience

      The fediverse skews much more queer than real life does, so that may be coloring your perception

      • Pokethat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have only been on the federverse for like two or three weeks. I meant in popular media and actually even in my real life interactions.

        I have heard things like I tried to be gay, or I wish I was a lesbian, etc. I do think that it’s influenced by media having this archetype of the cool/suave/fun/wise/good-crazy interesting side-character friend. Oftentimes these characters aren’t fully developed and their whole personality is that they are not straight, but they have this cool friend group thing going on and everyone likes them.

        Don’t get me wrong, there are fantastic examples of gay characters in media where they aren’t just the token diversity character, it too often we have quirky-dirky (but flat) interesting person whose only defining quality is that they’re not boring ol’ heterosexual

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      People love behind the scene movie facts. People also love subversive movie facts (see wizard of oz dark facts and rumors). People also love lesbians, so that’s where these rumors come from.

        • セリャスト@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Pretty much

          Lesbian romances in games like Life is strange true colours and shows like The Owl House make me go awwww like no other media does, and lesbian porn is just gross. I cant stand watching it (I am lesbian for reference)

          Edit: sorry for necroposting

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe the actress who said that made it up as a offhand joke to mess with the NYT but the NYT took it seriously for some reason.

    • SomeoneElse@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a real shame that’s (yet another) community that has been created by someone with no intention of posting anything. That was one of my favourites and I’m tempted to create an active community… but I’m already the mod of 3 decent sized communities and 3 tiny ones. Lemmy really really needs content posters to thrive - even if they’re just stealing content from Reddit like I am!