REP. JAMAAL BOWMAN’S Tuesday upset defeat by Westchester County Executive George Latimer generated many perspectives on what exactly precipitated his downfall.

The New York Times published the headline “Bowman Falls in House Primary, Overtaken by Flood of Pro-Israel Money” — before swapping it out for “Bowman Falls to Latimer in a Loss for Progressive Democrats.” Other coverage emphasized that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s spending wasn’t the only factor in the race and that Bowman’s flaws made him particularly vulnerable, as did changed district lines that made his reelection even tougher.

Progressive strategists, however, had a much more clear takeaway from the results.

“You don’t drop $15 million on an election if your positions are popular,” said Eva Borgwardt⁩, national spokesperson for the Jewish advocacy group IfNotNow, which endorsed Bowman. “This was an act of desperation from a pro-war lobby that is at odds with the majority of Americans, including American Jews.”

Borgwardt⁩ was referring to nearly $15 million spent on the race by AIPAC, the Israel lobby’s flagship in the U.S. Millions more poured in from AIPAC-aligned groups and donors, bringing the outside spending total to around $25 million.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    What has The Intercept done since then to regain my trust? Because I certainly haven’t heard them disavow or criticize their founder.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Write factually accurate articles with amazing investigative reporting. Should they condemn Hamas Glenn Greenwald at the beginning of every article?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        How about condemning him with any article? Just one.

        Because right now, he seems to be an untouchable subject when it comes to criticism from them, unlike virtually everything else.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Now you want me to go through every questionable thing Greenwald has said every time he does things like go on Fox News and agree with the presenter and pick a specific one?

            Okay, fine. How about when he called Donald Trump and Tucker Carlson socialists?

            https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/03/why-glenn-greenwald-says-tucker-carlson-is-a-true-socialist.html

            I’m sure The Intercept had a lot to say about that, right? No? Some other horrible stance he’s taken?

            • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I’ll agree with you that his comment is far fetched. His definition of a “socialist” appears to be more related to non-interventionism.

              As you had the courtesy to provide an example I did a little digging too and found that the Intercept did publish an article about Glenn which was not all that positive.

              His departure appears related to his belief that The Intercept was “censoring” his political views. https://theintercept.com/2020/10/29/glenn-greenwald-resigns-the-intercept/

              The articles I’ve read from Glenn from time to time have been accurate but it is good to know that his reporting is very selective.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                I’d read that article, but they apparently want to hoover up my data by making me make an account with my email address to sign in and read it.

                Another reason not to trust The Intercept apparently.