• rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s rather weird that a Christian cult would spend so much on people who are, according to that cult, pariahs.

        I don’t think support of Israel is that much connected to Christianity. It’s rather that when you have Israel, supporting it is a huge reputational counterweight to any fascist action you take.

        • Nutteman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s 100% wrapped up in Christianity. It’s all part of their apocalypse fantasy.

        • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 months ago

          Pariahs who need to have their own state for armageddon to happen. Remember that these are the same mental giants who invented the prosperity gospel. Not a cult so much as the entirety of southern baptism.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yep, starting with the first paragraph. The author might have skipped his Sunday school or something. In Christianity it’s considered that “God’s chosen people” has been extended to the whole humanity.

            “I don’t think these people even know what that truly means” - maybe most of them don’t, but they are using the designation correctly.

            “Arab citizens of Israel have the same rights as Jewish citizens” - well, the statement is kinda true ; technically false due to Israeli laws being a patchwork of weird shit with some inheritance from the Ottoman millets system, which is the same as apartheid give or take, but that’s not why the author is wrong. It’s just that most of Arabs living under Israeli military control are not citizens of Israel.

            Why am I even commenting that, there are sometimes outrageous texts with which it’s a dubious, but still pleasure to argue with. This one is just some jellybrain’s product.

        • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          > when you don’t read to the end of the bible so you don’t know why the US really wants Israel to exist

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I did read it a lot, it’s just that Christianity over the pond is weird. Weirder than in China and Japan, I can understand where their traits of it come from, but in USA it’s something hard for me to emotionally grasp.

            • Nutteman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              The USA’s relationship to Christianity is unique in that the first fuckers to come colonize the place were too strict even for Christianity in 17th century Europe. The Puritans were a blight upon this world and the ramifications are still sending aftershocks to the present day.

              • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                I should have added that practical Catholicism in South America doesn’t seem to have this kind of weirdness, so indeed it’s Puritans or even more generally, the spirit of a closed small sect, where the religion itself is not as important as the sect loyalty and uncritical following. Only it’s neither closed nor small.

    • Frog
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Israel has a huge intelliegence network that the US help them build by giving them billions of dollars.

      The US relations with that area is already really poor. Pulling support of Israel will bring the US back decades of relationship building, billions of dollars invested, and losing the location. The location is important because Israel is in the center, near water, and isn’t an island.

      Morally, being allies with Israel is not good, logically it makes sense.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Sounds a lot like sunken cost fallacy. We might be better off making other allies.

        • Frog
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          The president role is 7 years. Knesset seat is 4 years. Would you give up decades of relationship building for one presidential term?

          Also how often would you switch allies if they commit genocide defined by the Genocide Convention?

          • WraithGear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Over an active genocide? I would immediately end a friendship with a country and as many times as it takes to not be responsible for enabling a genocide. Allies don’t let allies commit genocide, everyone knows that. Besides it takes more than a president to do a genocide.

            • Frog
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              How much time needs to pass before a genocide is no longer an “active genocide”?

              • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I knew this would come up, which is why i specified this. Might as well as cut the head off the “every country has committed genocide at some point” argument. Not every country is actively committing genocide, Israel is. America is their chef supplier of power. America is actively Shielding them from the consequences of committing genocide.

                So we should stop backing a country that is actively committing genocide full stop. No money, no weapons, no blocking sanctions, no threatening countries and organizations trying to help the victims. This is the literal bare minimum, as we should be sanctioning them, we should be guaranteeing humanitarian aid to Palestinians.

                When is it not an active genocide? When the genocide stops.

                • Frog
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Let’s say we stopped being allies with them and stopped funding. So if they stop tomorrow, then the US should have them as allies again?

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        It being that important, surely somebody in the US government and intelligence have thought that they might not be abusing only that importance for funds, but the ties themselves for influence. In the sense of spying at the US, corruption and such.

        • Frog
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          They could very well be doing those things. Israel is a technology powerhouse now. Being allies allows more political accountability.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      After WW2 everyone felt really bad. And it was a west-leaning country in a region full of oil and big trade routes.

      Most of the calculus has slowly changed over the years. The Congressionally-passed treaties all still remain though.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        And it was a west-leaning country in a region full of oil and big trade routes.

        Other way around - their loyalties weren’t firmly lodged with either of the superpowers, so the US in the 70s and 80s put a lot of time and effort into wooing them.

        Their loyalties still aren’t lodged with anyone, but we keep sucking them off anyway.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Their loyalties still aren’t lodged with anyone, but we keep sucking them off anyway.

          Well, I shit at Israel every day, but they would be nuts to “lodge their loyalties” when that means loss of such leverage.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Contrary to the delusions of realpolitik types, international relations are a matter of relations, not purely moment-to-moment vulture capitalist behavior. Israel is coasting on internal factors within the US government at present - the lack of actual mutual loyalty means that, should those internal factors (Israeli dark money and the political influence of evangelical millenarians) ever weaken, the institutions of the US will see little reason not to throw Israel to the wolves.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Israeli dark money

              … is something important enough to kill a 100 JFKs for.

              It’s a state sporting F35s and such.

              and the political influence of evangelical millenarians

              Can’t speak about them, I don’t live in the US and the fact of such a group existing is wild for me.

              • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 months ago

                … is something important enough to kill a 100 JFKs for.

                To the Israelis, maybe. To Americans, Israeli money has become a polarizing issue over the past decade.

                It’s a state sporting F35s and such.

                Man, plenty of US allies are involved in the F-35 program and the US doesn’t bend over backwards for them. It’s really not that important in the grand scheme of US-Israeli relations.

                • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Those plenty are not so numerous if we consider how many nation-states there are on the globe.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      And why do we think they need more weapons to “defend” themselves if they’re threatening to obliterate multiple other countries?

  • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you take a country “back to the stone age” it absolutely requires attacks on civilian infrastructure.

    So any country that respects international law and human life could not in good conscience give them weapons or support to do this.

    Gosh I wonder what Biden will do…

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      He can’t hear you he’s too busy sending them more weapons and support.

  • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    At this point I don’t know which country is more ridiculous, Israel or North Korea. They’re basically the same, a tiny pariah state barking loud at anyone that looks at them while getting support from a rich neighbor.

  • Tomassci@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    This quote could’ve been passed as from Putin and would be believable. Astonishing that people still don’t notice the parallels.

  • itstoowet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can you fucking not, Israel? I was just there and lebanon is having enough trouble as is (as usual).

    • frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      One of these days, they’re going to reveal their “Final Solution” when it comes to Muslims. It’s obvious this is an extermination campaign.

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    The US has couped and attempted coups of better nations for worse reasons and yet they give this genocidal maniac all the leeway and weapons he could ask for. This is who the US is. There’s simply no money to be made saving victims of genocide so they will go unsaved.