• macrocephalic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    223
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    They work in tech, promotions are achieved by moving employers. Internal mobility is always terrible in tech companies.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      ·
      4 months ago

      Very much this. I have never switched employers and not received a sizable salary bump in the process. This isn’t quite “don’t threaten me with a good time” territory, but it’s not far removed from it.

    • sudo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yup. It’s the same fucked-up psychology corps use for their customers. Like running ads for super discounts for new customers. Existing customers that have never missed a payment? Fuck-em. Instead of giving 1% “thank you” for good customers, corps would rather lose the good customers and pay a premium to find new ones.

      So it goes.

    • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yuuuup lowest pay bump I have gotten was 10k highest was over 50k with the potential of a bonus. I got low balled for a long years and am now like pay me. Wish I would have seen/known my worth long ago before getting taken advantage of

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m admittedly not familiar with the data, but I have the impression that this is true with quite a few fields, tech or otherwise. I think they prey upon loss aversion.

      • Chocrates@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think it is just American working culture. Corporations slowly eroded benefits over the years to where we are today and your salary is pretty much stuck at a 3% cost of living raise if you are lucky. My last job had an HR cap at 10% and my boss “pulled some strings” to get me an 8% bump (with a ton of extra responsibilities) and I still made 20k less than the fucking new hires. I still stayed 2 more years.

        • 0x0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not just American unfortunately… crap ass managers use the internet too, the news spreads… beyond the marginal raise i get due to inflation every year i only ever get a decent raise by, well, changing companies.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve never been promoted in a job and the biggest pay increase I’ve ever gotten was 10%. Switching jobs never failed to get me at least 30% more and a promotion.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    191
    ·
    4 months ago

    Dell announced a new return-to-office initiative earlier this year. In the new plan, workers had to classify themselves as remote or hybrid.

    Those who classified themselves as hybrid are subject to a tracking system that ensures they are in a physical office 39 days a quarter, which works out to close to three days per work week.

    Alternatively, by classifying themselves as remote, workers agree they can no longer be promoted or hired into new roles within the company.

    Holy corporate oppression, Batman! That’s a shitty deal no matter which option you choose.

    I’m glad they’ve got themselves into a sticky situation.

    Also, this observation was funny (in a sad way):

    One person said they’d spoken with colleagues who had chosen to go hybrid, and those colleagues reported doing work in mostly empty offices punctuated with video calls with people who were in other mostly empty offices.

    • stealth_cookies
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      4 months ago

      One major downside of hybrid working really is that if you are having a meeting where even a single person is not there, then the entire meeting may as well be a video call. If you are on a video call, then why do you need to be in the office for it?

      At my job we work with physical objects, so being in office is a requirement at least part of the time, but if I’m just going to be in meetings for most of the day, there is no way I’m going into the office just to sit on video calls all day.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      You mean to tell me, three days a week, they have to:

      • wake up extra hours early
      • pack a lunch or plan to pay for one
      • put on hard pants
      • drive their own vehicle in traffic, with their own gas and wear/tear
      • pay for their own parking.
      • do the exact same work in their designated space
      • drive back home in traffic 9 hours later

      All for the same pay and several hours away from my family, home, or bed?

      No fucking thanks.

      Going remote was the best fucking raise I ever got, and it didn’t cost them a dime.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      So you could just got he the office days straight and don’t show up for the rest of the year… interesting… but considering promotions are everything but lately i’d just go remote anyway.

          • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            4 months ago

            That would be the dream, but it hasn’t panned out, and my long notice period is hampering me. I’m not going to continue slogging it out here indefinitely, and I don’t need to.

            I don’t need any additional anxiety to discourage me from getting out of this before I just burn out and am in a worse position.

            • verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 months ago

              I saw a handmade sign in a floating workshop for ships, it stated “Please Resist Entropy”. That has inspired me ever since. It sounds like you are resisting entropy and good for you. Wish you better times and a better job. o7

            • Ben Hur Horse Race@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              fair enough, and I’m sure you know what you’re doing. I’ve always felt that I’m in a much, much stronger position saying I’m employeed but I’d prefer to work for you rather than them suspecting that I just need some job, any job ya know

              anyway, hope you work it out

              • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Thanks, it’s the culmination of a lot of thought and a previous attempt by my manager and I to rework things to make it better but hasn’t really worked out. Onwards and upwards, I’d still intend to find a job during the 3 months notice period before I’m set loose so ideally I won’t lose the “tempt me away” factor before I get a new gig.

          • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah but, if it was remotely enjoyable, then you might make 2 or maybe even 3% less profit for the lazy, workshy scroungers who own the company.

            We can’t have that now can we?

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      ineligible for promotion

      This seems like an empty threat to me. Every promotion I’ve ever gotten internally has come with a negligible pay increase (~4%). The best promotions I’ve gotten have been leaving to take a new job somewhere else (~20-50%).

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        And that 4% just buys you a year before inflation cuts it back down again. Searching for a job from home is easier.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      4 months ago

      Probably while updating their resumes and looking around for replacement jobs in case they find a better one. I know I would.

    • Aermis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Man these sensational titles for articles have been setting such a deceiving narrative. I feel like I’m in a veiled world since like 2015

  • corsicanguppy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This would be a handy way to get rid of half your staff, but the people you chase away are usually the ones you want to keep. As per the Dead-Sea Effect, the ones who will leave are the ones who generally are more able to, who will be your most employable people, and thus your most talented. Usually.

    Making work suck, and letting the best half of the staff bail, seems like stupid and a game show.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I read somewhere that convincing people to quit was party of some companies’ plan when demanding return to office, but as you pointed out, they probably lost their top 10% or more in the quality workers group. So do that introvert parasites can have their “corporate culture” (or more critically, justify leading that bigass office building).

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        So much the better, as far as those executives are concerned.

        Let’s say you want to cut costs and you know you have momentum and a long lag where your total incompetence won’t make a difference to business results in the short term, so cut costs by getting rid of the top talent.

        Now if they outright just fire every good person, well that looks obviously stupid, but if those good people just… up and quit… well they are hardly to blame, and don’t have to pay out those massive severances. You get your annual bonus which is big, and your big restricted stock payday might be delayed two years, but they know, realistically, they can probably coast a good 3 or 4 years before the game is up. Or if you have a supremely strong ‘business brand’, you might be able to coast indefinitely as the big shots will never believe that brand isn’t good anymore.

    • iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Doesn’t matter in the world of next quarter vision. So shortsighted.

  • UmeU@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    And Dell said “Great, thanks, saved us a ton on severance packages and allowed us to replace our high paid tenured employees with hungry graduates who are prepared to work themselves to death for peanuts”

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Truth.

      Been job hunting in similar fields for a while and as a middle-aged person, I simply cannot get a callback from any of these companies, then when you actually visit them and see some of their workforce, you rarely see anyone over late-20’s, and it’s all these high-energy, eager-to-please, eager-to-work-for-recognitionbucks, fresh-outta-college kids who can be exploited and turned over rapidly.

      I am job hunting because the previous company I managed was bought out, downsized, and all the senior employees making more than entry level wages were cut. This is happening everywhere.

      More and more technology, overseas outsourcing options, and general service/gig systems for filling job openings has left companies treating workers as disposable as toilet paper.

      This is because almost every business is now part of a huge chain of ownership, and the shareholders at the top, groups of very rich old white dudes, just gather together in their hooded cloaks and look at the bars and graphs every month and decide what investments are to be amputated, and which to be kept. Before going back to their private sex islands.

      • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        High paying jobs with tons of new graduates have an oversaturated supply problem. It’s no surprise that when people figure out that becoming a software developer is easy street to 150k+++ WFH that there was a huge rush to get those jobs… now that there are TONS and TONS of young junior devs there is no shortage to hire someone for near minimum wage.

        Why pay 400k for a senior developer when you can hire a mid-level for ~100k to be a manager, and 4 juniors for 60k a piece, and augment them with chatgpt to help them learn what they are skill gapped by.

        Plus junior devs are so desperate you can force them to come into the office, something the dev divas ten years ago refused to do back when there was a huge shortage of coders.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          4 months ago

          Absolutely correct, I watched this happen to our tech team before I was also thrown in the chipper.

          And it doesn’t help that a lot of the young people trying to get into coding and tech fields are not what you would call titans of confidence and charisma, these are mostly introverted and thoughtful people who have studied most of their lives under the belief that meritocracy exists, and they can prove themselves in the business world by doing great work and being a good employee.

          Meanwhile glance over at the sales side of the building and there are people there making six figures a year who do next to nothing but party and tell lewd jokes, but are absolutely invulnerable to layoffs and downsizing as long as they can talk to clients and joke about sports with the CEO.

          The disillusionment around the business world is real and unsustainable.

          • LordCrom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 months ago

            God my last sales team were annoying. You can hear their bullshit from the floor above. They never shut up.

            • ameancow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              Every job I’ve had I’ve ended up becoming a liaison of sorts between the sales teams and the operational teams because I seem to be the Daywalker, who can walk between worlds and communicate with the techy nerds, take their issues to the loud sales assholes and make it all work.

              It’s not an enjoyable role but it always earned me high marks because nobody else can stomach it.

            • letsgo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I had the misfortune to have to share an office with a bunch of sales morons. I can recommend Bose idiot-cancelling headphones. What a bunch of selfish noisy fuckwombles.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          I would like live in this world. We are trying to hire, and it’s basically as hard as ever. Senior developers are super hard to get, or even to talk to. Even if you pay above average rates.

          There’s plenty of “LinkedIn senior” developers, tho. But after 3 years of C they can’t explain a static variable or can’t define a promise claiming to be js experts.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        and this is why we are going to have a surge in enshittification in every piece of software and engineering around. eagerness and high energy does not replace decade of experience and ability to hold your composure against corporate pressure to do shady shit (if anything eagerness to please enable it)

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Since the shareholders only care about 6-month projections, they will always choose a shitty, short-term successes with rushed products with patches later or promises of continued bugfixing, than spending more money and time to make something that users approve of and passes all requirements.

          The shit is already running pretty deep.

      • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s like seeing the Dracula myth reborn. They periodically come to wreak great violence, but always draining. Always unseen. Always feeding.

    • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      4 months ago

      who are prepared to work themselves to death for peanuts

      …while having no idea what they are doing

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      When I got hired at my job where I could write and dictate policy, the first thing I did was write up a new IT Purchasing Policy with a “Banned Manufacturers” section right up top with HP right at #1 and Dell at #2

    • stealth_cookies
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      4 months ago

      Considering that HP is the other choice that most businesses consider, I’d take the Dell 100% of the time. HP’s laptops are complete and utter trash.

      • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Lenovo is at the top of the enterprise devices game right now. I always say they operate in cycles and usually each brand trades every 2 years who is at number one.

        I still will always shit on HP. And HPE Aruba switches are absolutely trash.

        • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          Funny, I try to block anyone in my department that wants to purchase a Lenovo. My most recent experiences with them have been a faulty battery driver that was known online for at least six months before it was brought to my attention that the model I purchased for someone (their choice) refused to recharge, and Lenovo continued to deny any problems on their side… We returned the laptop as unusable because the only way to charge it was to boot into the BIOS screen. The last time I dealt with them, the corporate rep I worked with was right on top of emails and phone calls until we made a purchase, then refused to answer my contacts after that. After a month of trying to get in touch with him I finally called the main line, and the person I spoke with said “oh he just walked by my desk, let me grab him”. The excuse I was given was that he had been too busy to respond.

          Basically every time I’ve been forced to purchase a Lenovo for someone, there has been zero support provided and half of them had to be returned. Granted, I haven’t bought any since COVID but I really hope I never have to deal with them again.

        • corsicanguppy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Lenovo: it may as well be Huawei.

          You… don’t follow that rule?

        • catastrophicblues
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          What about for personal use? I’m in the market for a relatively high end machine around $2k, but build quality is pretty high up on my priorities.

        • stealth_cookies
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Lenovo should be out just by virtue of being a Chinese company. You should not trust critical security devices to Chinese companies.

      • mPony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        HP’s laptops are complete and utter trash

        a) yes b) perhaps that also describes their management

    • thejml@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Our shop has two options (for security and management, they keep the options lean). Dell Windows 11 machines and Mac. The suckiness of the Dell ecosystem, combined with Windows 11 being fairly terrible, has pushed most all of my colleagues over to Mac over the last few years. Even most of the ASP.NET developers are on Mac at this point. This just solidifies that direction even further.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        My company has one option, Lenovo with locked down Windows 11. We didn’t want to deal with the IT dept constantly, so we told them we need Macs and bought them ourselves, despite most of our team (including me) not liking Apple. We don’t need macOS for anything, we just build software for Linux servers and Windows desktops, but here we are because of stupid corporate policy.

        I use a Lenovo running Linux at home, and my next laptop will probably be a Framework. But I use macOS all day because IT depts kinda suck. They won’t allow Linux either, if it’s company hardware, it runs company images, or stock in the case of Apple…

        • thejml@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ours basically added MacOS as an option because they didn’t want to manage Linux and there are standard security tools for it. I don’t mind MacOS, it has its quirks, but it beats W11. I had an HP with Linux there before the company decided to drop it and I do miss it, but knowing I’d have to now have a Dell with Linux if they still had the option, I’ll take the Apple hardware knowing all the issues the windows guys have.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Eh, I’d take an enterprise Dell with Linux over macOS, but I’d take macOS over Windows.

            I honestly don’t understand IT departments sometimes…

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Anyone want to start a company. Work from home. We’ll split profits among ourselves. We can. Build blackjack lottery machines and webhookers

  • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If this country cared about the environment or workers’ safety, they’d fine companies who make employees work in the office/on site when they could work from home instead.

    • teamevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Problem is most of the folks influencing those that make laws also have huge real estate portfolios of commercial real estate.

    • corsicanguppy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 months ago

      I peaced out at 2. Manager was a bit of a prick, and the office was bright, hot, cramped, loud, and had no visual or audio privacy.

      No fucking thanks.

      Found a job thanks to my peers and it’s a little more pay and 100% remote as per the union contract. Wheeee. Work anywhere in the country.

        • kopasz7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          The problem is taxation for the employer usually. But you can become self employed and pay your taxes locally as your own employer and invoice your sercices to the company you work with.

          This is what I did some years ago without moving borders.

    • golli@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I wonder if this method doesn’t overproportionally eliminates valuable workers, who can easily switch companies.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sounds like a problem for the next CEO. I got quarterly metrics to meet. When shit hits the fan cause all the talent left I’ll just eject with my golden parachute.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Pretty much.

        Capable employees don’t raise a huge stink.

        They quietly put the word out to a few people they know and play along until something interesting appears on the horizon.

        Then when they’re good and ready they just “suddenly” fuck off to somewhere nicer for them.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s consistent with my office, plus a hiring freeze so nobody new coming in.

    Fortunately, for me, my cardiologist told them to pound sand. Working from home now since 2018.

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    They were probably like, “Finally, I can go to a company that doesn’t force me to use a Dell.”