• EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      You’re right, I wanted an answer to my question and instead you rephrased my question, which avoided my actual point, and then only kind of answered that question.

      Let me try to rephrase to get to my point: this shop has security cameras, insurance, and other reasonable protective and preventative methods, they get robbed (which still result in a financial hit). Are they victims?

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Another user to the pile here to say that their response fully answered your question.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t see it. So please explain. Can they be a victim?

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Sorry, you’re going to have to keep looking. Somehow, everyone else got the answer to your question.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s obvious who is confident in defending their position and who is not.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          corporations are not people, they are soulless, for-profit enterprises that will, for damn sure, abuse and exploit any one and any thing they can in the name of profit. They don’t get the defense of “victim blaming”.

          So you agree with me that corporations can be victims, which is what I was originally responding to and you originally challenged.

          You’re now saying that if proper precautions are not taken, you can’t be considered a victim.

          This is classic victim blaming, which is my point. If I leave my wallet on the table at a bar and someone steals it, despite me being an idiot I’m still the victim of a crime. It’s not my fault, it’s the fault of the person who stole it.

          Just like with the company in the OP, they are idiots for not taking proper precautions against malicious actors, but it’s still the fault of the malicious actor.

          • Hacksaw
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Corporations can’t be victims of victim blaming

            So you agree that they can be victims of victim blaming

            That user that tagged you as “purposeful idiot” was fucking spot on.