• ZC3rr0r
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I still find it frustrating to see the exact same vehicles get significantly different tow ratings here vs Europe.

    The other day the dealer tried to warn not to tow my utility trailer with my car as it would hurt the transmission (trailer was empty by the way). I pulled up an article from the UK where it was in the top three of best towing cars for this year.

    Dealer looked at me like his brain needed to reboot, after which he told me the cars in Europe must be built differently or get different transmissions and left it at that.

    It’s truly baffling that manufacturers here hold that towing capacity hostage for arbitrary reasons.

    • linuxisfun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      11 months ago

      There might actually be technical reasons for this.

      E. g. top speed in Europe while towing is 100 km/h (some countries and trailers less), whereas in the US you can drive up to the designated speed limit.

      Bearing load is also different, in Europe it’s usually 4 % of the trailer weight, in the US at least 10 % is recommended.

      Trailers are also different, e. g. unbraked trailers only exist up to 750 kg in Europe, whereas in the US I’ve seen much heavier trailers without brakes.

      Trailer brakes are also different, Europe uses overrun brakes, the US electronic brakes.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve never heard the term “overrun brakes” (TIL!) before. I’ve always called them surge brakes, and they are widespread in the U.S. on the majority of boat trailers.

          • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            You are 100% correct. I had to search overrun brakes online, and from what I found it seems to be a regional language variation.

      • ZC3rr0r
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s actually the most reasonable explanation I’ve seen so far, and it helps explain a bunch (one small correction: most states have a towing speed limit of either 55 or 65 mph, so just about the same or slower than in Europe. Canada is even worse with most provinces limiting highway towing speed to 80-90kmh). That said, it still doesn’t make any sense that our tow rating does not take into account the presence of a brake controller (that is to say, the stated towing capacity does not list braked and unbraked separately in most cars except trucks).

        • linuxisfun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          one small correction: most states have a towing speed limit of either 55 or 65 mph, so just about the same or slower than in Europe

          Interesting, thanks for the correction! I didn’t spend the time to research it for all states / provinces, when I researched this topic a while ago.

          brake controller

          In Europe electronic brake controllers aren’t really a thing. Mechanical overrun brakes are used instead to brake trailers.

          That said, it still doesn’t make any sense that your tow rating does not take into account the presence of a brake controller

          Cars in Europe usually have two tow ratings, one for braked, the other for unbraked trailers.

          • trailers up to 750 kg can be unbraked and can be driven with a Class B driver’s license
          • trailers above 750 kg must be braked; you need a separate Class BE driver’s license, if the total weight of the combination is above 3500 kg
          • ZC3rr0r
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            My bad, that was a typo - I mean our tow rating. Most vehicles (except for trucks) don’t list the tow rating with a brake controller installed and the only way to get one is to have your vehicle rated and tested individually.

      • seang96@spgrn.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        My SUV can have a hitch addon but it’s towing capacity is less than a ton lol

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This seems not very fuck cars but ok. Also who does not know you can tow with a car?

    • spiphy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think this is in response to stupid large truck vs kei truck thread that made the front page. All the car brains are going on about how everyone ever needs a stupid large truck to tow 85 boats at once

      • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        While you don’t need a massive truck to tow things, I also can’t recommend towing with a VW Golf. Towing isn’t just pulling a trailer, it’s also stopping a trailer, keeping it steady at speed, and having a transmission that can handle it and keep temps in check. Longer wheelbases do help with stability at speed and sports brakes aren’t built for towing.

        • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          You can bet your ass that if it’s certified to pull a certain weight in Europe, all these things have been taken into account.

          • bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Easy Google search shows this car should not be pulling a travel trailer.

            Motorcycle trailer, sure. But basically best case scenario this trailer is at it’s tow capacity, which does not give much wiggle room for failure.

            But most likely it’s quite past the tow capacity. It’s tow capacity is 2000kg/4400lbs. A travel trailer’s dry weight is already close to that. If it was a pop up camper that’d be one thing, but this is a full dead ass travel trailer. It’s probably around 5000lbs, and who knows what’s stuffed in the back. This is a safety issue.

            Quick edit: this is not to say you need to own an F150 for the one time a year you do this, but maybe rental?

            • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              It’s also possible to have cars modified to increase towing capacity. I’m not saying this particular car has had that done. But you do see a lot of Dutch towing trailers in Germany. I’ve never heard of anything bad happening, other than them clogging the fucking motorways with their slow ass jalopies.

              • bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Idk someone else in this thread said that it’s kinda a rule in the EU not to buy a used Dutch car with a trailer hitch

            • Darukhnarn@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              We, having a regulatory body that defines itself trough regulations, of course have a regulation for that. Furthermore, we define how and when it’s applicable and so forth

              • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                Thank you! This is more or less what I’m looking for. It’s in German and my German is rusty at best, but I’m glad they’re more specific. Since both are in German is this specific to Germany or EU as a whole? I was digging through the UKs rules which referenced some EU regulations. It sounds like somewhere around the late 90s trailer brakes became mandated per wheel. Which is obviously vastly different from here in the states where it’s kind of an “ehhhhh, good luck.” But at the same token it had me curious if the test is in the same consistent area with consistent factors at play. The SAE here in the states has created a new standard for the US, but it also isn’t used by the manufacturers which plays a big part in our usage of trailers and how we tow and haul here.

                • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  It’s EU, so it’s available in every language.

                  Also, am not from EU, but my country is in process of accession. Our laws are already being aligned with EU. I think traffic laws are already there. Many other countries just copy these laws since they consider them good.

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          And yet, the Golf is rated for up to 2,000kg in the UK (a select few Diesel models), and a 1,200-1,600kg range is typical for many other editions of that model. That’s for a trailer with its own brakes, of course. When I had a trailer with electric brakes, I could stop the whole rig with just the brake controller. I towed that trailer with an S10 Blazer, which had a wheelbase only 4 inches longer than the Golf. The trick was to load it with enough tongue weight that stability was not a problem, rather than relying on a hefty vehicle to overcome sway. I never had a problem with transmission temperatures when keeping the trailer weight under the rated capacity of the vehicle, but an aftermarket oil cooler can always be fitted.

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s for a trailer with its own brakes, of course.

            You won’t find a trailer in the EU without its own breaks over 750kg. At least not a legal one.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          When I see how much crap is driving on American roads that would have been taken off the road in Europe in under a New York Second, and see how much tighter road safety regulations are in Europe, I’d say rest assured that all of this has been taken into account. Road safety is similar to many other market issues that in Europe, safety comes way before profit.

        • Transcendant@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t know a lot about cars, but we used to go caravanning as a kid and my stepdad would always use a long, reasonably-powerful car to tow it. And come to think of it, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen one being towed by a hatchback (and we get a lot of caravans on the road here in the UK)

          • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The problem isn’t that no one’s thought of those things. The problem is that in Countries like the US and UK (and I’m assuming everywhere else, but maybe not) you can tow up to 7500lbs with a standard license. Last time I took my test I don’t recall them asking about towing or making me do it with a trailer. We build systems for the lowest common denominator but honestly vehicle towing is kind of a cluster fuck of “well they can drive a car, how much worse could they be with an extra 15ft and thousands of pounds behind them.” ¯_(ツ)_/¯

            • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              11 months ago

              You need a towing license for anything heavier than 750kg. Europe and surroundings are like that. For any trailer heavier than 750kg, you need to pass an exam and get a license, no matter what’s towing it, be it truck or car and that’s the way it should be, heavy trailer behaves differently regardless what’s towing it. Then again, if this would apply everywhere we wouldn’t have so many funny videos of people fucking up their boats and similar. So carry on.

              By the way, categories:

              • Ooops@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                But there are still a lot of people on the road that did learn to drive before that kind of license. I did a class 3 license in Germany right before the transition…

                So I have my A, A1, AM, B, BE, C1, C1E license (C1E limited to 7,5t instead of 12) without ever having learned to tow anything.

                • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  You are right. Not sure why they did the transition like that. My father has all those and higher even though he hasn’t driven a truck for decades now. But it will eventually get better.

              • realleif@lemmy.sdfeu.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                At least where I am from, you are allowed to tow heavy trailers (>750 kg) with a B drivers license, if both the car and the trailer combined weigh less than 3.5 t. Light trailers (<750 kg) can be towed by any vehicle up to 3.5 t with a B license. If the combined rated weight is above 3.5 t you need a BE license as well and you have to drive slower.

        • Snackette@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          Glad someone said it. Just because you can pull something doesn’t mean you can stop or maintain pulling said thing. That being said yeah I agree you don’t always need a truck.

          • Schmuppes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            11 months ago

            If the car is rated for towing the weight of the trailer, of course it can stop it. That’s what the authorities are going to test, among other things, before greenlighting a car with those specifications.

            • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              They’ll test it for the weight, however it’s important to understand the testing cycle. Were the tests only setup on flat ground? Did they adequately test braking? Did they ride the brakes for a while? Is there a difference between haulable weight with trailer brakes vs without? It’s also important to note that in the US tow ratings are setup by the manufacturer… which means that numbers are super subjective and simply a circle jerk of who is willing to legally put a larger number on the vehicle.

              All the new 3/4 ton trucks can tow more than US drivers with a class C license in most states could legally carry. The numbers are kind of useless IMO.

              • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                11 months ago

                Will they test it? Absolutely! Every year when I extend registration on vehicle everything gets tested on a car. Vehicle must pass technical exam which lasts some 40minutes. Breaks are tested the longest among other things. They measure not only breaking force but consistency, elongation of disks if you have them, everything.

                Of course there are still people out there who don’t maintain their vehicle properly after that exam, but at least once a year it has to be in tip top shape. Also if you have a towing hook by new regulation it has to be tested as well and removable. It’s actually illegal to drive with it if you are not towing anything, since it effectively negates crumple zones.

                People are constantly complaining about how strict these rules here are, but I don’t. They save lives.

                • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Thank you, thank you! 100% here in California we have incredibly strict emissions testing, but absolutely ZERO maintenance checks. Which is more of what I worry about since there’s loads of vehicles on the road that have balding tires, abysmal brakes and cracks all over the glass. We’re somehow one of the few states without this kind of testing even though our vehicles need a bi-annual emissions test.

                  Also, definitely wish people had to remove their tow hitch here in the states. Loads of people’s drive with them in and nothing on it. They’re shin busters on sidewalks.

              • GbyBE@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                11 months ago

                As far as I know, the maximum unbraked trailer mass is 750kg in Europe, although for some cars it can be lower.

                With a braked trailer the limit is up to the manufacturer (and your driver’s license).

                • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Thank you! How long has the trailer brake been common/mandated over that size in Europe? I tried looking it up but the closest I could find was some UK government website mentioning the 90s (or maybe early 2000s).

              • Treczoks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                They’ll test it for the weight, however it’s important to understand the testing cycle. Were the tests only setup on flat ground? Did they adequately test braking? Did they ride the brakes for a while?

                Well, it seems that you are not familiar with European road safety testing and certification. My BIL was working in that area, and his executive summary of that was: if it passes European tests, you can sign the American test papers, too, as it would pass them with flying colors.

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            In Europe, it would not get a rating for a certain weight if it was not able to safely handle and stop it.

      • kugel7c@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        You are completely correct I was essentially trying to move along the conversation from the last post.

        • Fisk400@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s a good way to go. Some people may be unable to imagine not having a car but they may be able to go with a smaller car. It’s the car equivalent of going vegetarian 2 days a week.

          • scottyjoe9@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I would love to go car free but it’s basically impossible where I live due to lack of other viable options.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oh you mean those 4 door vans that are passed off as a truck? Yeah no one should get those, they can’t even tow all that well and what can you even use a 4 foot bed for? These are likely the same people that think you should get a $130k 5th wheel that is 32 feet long.

      • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I find it very strange that Americans consider ‘trucks’ and ‘cars’ to be two separate things. Trucks are cars.

        • nutcase2690@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          By law they are separate and distinct. Trucks are subject to less environmental regulations (emissions, mpg) are allowed to not conform as closely to automobile standards (the reason why you see trucks with the hood above the height of small children, and you need a stepladder to climb in) and also have to pass different crash tests to be considered “road safe” (a truck only has to not annihilate another truck in a crash test, but crash tests aren’t done with say a truck and a motorcycle, or a truck and a small car)

          • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t think it works that way anywhere outside the US. Anyways, shouldn’t it be trucks and ‘other’ cars?

            • nutcase2690@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yeah, I was typing this up from the perspective of US laws. I would hope that it doesn’t work that way anywhere else! It is crazy here, haha But yes, it probably should be trucks and ‘other’ cars.

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yes, they have the law tailored to actually prefer gas guzzlers over normal cars. And less need to care for the drivers or the environments safety.

      • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I have a stupid large truck that can tow boats at 85 (2013 tundra stock) to tow the family camper and I keep that bad boy under 65 when towing and always drive like a kid is going to run out in front. Sure I could drive a kei truck and would fucking love it, however my truck is the smallest in height that I could have gotten that could pull the weight I needed (and if possible I’ll make it shorter). Fuck paying the stupid prices at hotels and airbnbs, I camp with my towable home for $30-$80 a night.

      • chaogomu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        That thread was specifically telling craftspeople that they could do their jobs with the little Kei truck rather than a larger one.

        If you use your truck for actual work, you want it to be able to do the job. The Kei truck cannot do the same job as the big truck.

        It was a stupid comparison. It’s like telling someone that they don’t need a bucket truck to work on overhead lines or do tree trimming, they can just use a ladder hauled around in a Kei truck. See? Stupid as fuck.

        No, the correct post to make would have been to point out the obvious fact that 95% of those huge trucks sold are not used for any sort of work at all, they’re just expensive and obnoxious fashion statements.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Funny, though, that in Europe, nearly nobody drives a pickup truck. Not even craftspeople. In this city, I’ve seen one (one!) private pickup, two used by the cities greens department, one by the forest department, and one by a gardening company (and they are a big gardening company, but they have real trucks for most of the work).

    • knowledgephoenix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      In my personal American experience, there’s a general notion that you need a pickup truck to tow anything; there’s so much marketing about how big tough pickup trucks can tow so much stuff and you really need this. So I think the implication of this post is less of a “fuck cars” and more of a “fuck trucks in particular”

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I use my old 3/4 ton all the time it is great for yard work and getting stuff (big things not like groceries). But I would never think of using it to commute or move people. I think people get sold on these trucks being all big and powerful but they always seem to use them like a minivan, and a minivan also can tow things.

      • nsfw_alt_2023@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        AI drive a compact SUV (a glorified hatchback with a raised wheelbase), and took a trailer to cover the western US for my vacation this year, but looking at the vehicle in the post: The only way that works because the car drives at sea level with no grade. I had a trailer, with brakes, ~150 lbs below of my car’s recommended towing capacity, and coming over some passes sounded like I was taking thousands of miles off my car’s transmission.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve seen Golfs towing caravans over the Alps. Only Americans seem to need a truck for that.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Americans, which is how this post got started. Over on the site that shall remain nameless, one guy unironically told me that I might be able to tow a 150lbs. sailboat with my bicycle on flat ground, but to go up hills would require his truck. Anecdotally, I know a couple who bought a Ford Model F truck to tow a 700lbs. sailboat, because it takes a truck to tow things, despite the total weight of the boat and trailer being less than half the rated capacity for a Honda Civic.

      • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Is yours a geared cycle? I’m pretty sure a cycle frame can carry ~150 kg, but the brakes and your legs might have issues. Like I can carry a 60 kg friend on my (ungeared) cycle on flat roads. But going uphill would definitely be hard, and downhill might be dangerous.

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yes, I have an 8-speed IGH, and a cargo trailer for my bike that’s rated for 90kg (200lbs). It adds braking distance, but standard rim brakes handle it fine. To haul a Laser sailboat would take a special trailer, because they’re about 4 meters long. It’d be a workout, but eminently possible.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I agree but diesel cars are much more common in Europe and they have better towing capacity due to higher torque.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Not the core issue. My car does not run on Diesel, but I would not have any issues dragging such a caravan around. That is perfectly normal in Europe.

      Why the Americans think one would need a thick fat pickup or truck just to pull a caravan is beyond me. Maybe it is just smart marketing to make people buy even bigger cars than they ever need.

      • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        A quick search shows a civic can tow 1,100 lbs. A dodge caravan can tow 3,600 lbs. An F-150 tows 14,000 lbs.

        Now someone may have a legitimate reason to need to tow thousands of pounds, such as someone who moves horses around.

        But for normal use, my tool trailer comes in under 1,000kg (2,200 lbs); maybe someone working in a mountainous area would need more power? Most likely marketing.

        • LazaroFlim@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s like choosing to drive a tractor around. Those F150 are great machines in circumstances where they are needed, but to go food shopping, you don’t need that. I have a RAV4 hybrid (my work requires a large trunk space, and I have kids and a dog) and I get 50mpg and people are amazed compared to 12mpg of their truck. Go figure.

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yep. I’ve got a SEAT Alhambra because I need trunk space, too - and it’s a nice trunk space, easy to use. And I can tow 1800kg, despite it being not a diesel.

        • null_recurrent@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I haul more stuff with my little 4x8 utility trailer and small hybrid than most of the big F150 people around me. I routinely get full loads of compost from the municipal dump.

        • FriedCheese@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          My parents used to have a 2008 dodge Durango that they were told would be good enough to haul their 3500 lb camper. (Needed 7 seats for 5 kids + them)

          This thing did not do well hauling the camper. It struggled going up the mountains where we vacationed and it struggled just as bad coming back down because the brakes couldn’t handle the dead weight.

          Now us kids have grown up and moved out and they got an F150 that hauls their new camper, about the same weight (3700 lb) like it’s not even back there.

          I think there’s a lot more to it than how much weight the car can actually pull. But I couldn’t say since I’m not that knowledgeable.

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The caravans in Europe are much lighter than the trailers in North America.

        • Screeslope@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve seen plenty of small “Euro-sized” cars pull fully loaded horse trailers, so I suspect weight is not much of an issue. You need to get power on the road, and for that bulkyness of the frame is hardly the main factor.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Are they? As caravans are quite popular in Europe, I can’t imagine we are missing something in a lighter caravan, so who do Americans have in theirs that makes the heavier?

      • joel_feila@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well our Rv are way larger then that most of the time. That’s why the most popular models are self mobile

    • Cyborganism
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s about to change. After finding out the vast minority, if not all, car manufacturer were found cheating emissions tests, diesel car usage has been limited and production stopped, or will stop in the near future.

      • eldavi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s about to change. After finding out the vast minority, if not all, car manufacturer were found cheating emissions tests, diesel car usage has been limited and production stopped, or will stop in the near future.

        i’m aware of volkwagen and co. doing this; what other manufacturers have been caught?

            • Treczoks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Many have been caught. Not all of them have made a big deal about it.

              You simply cannot build a compliant engine without cheating. The fight has gone to the courts to find out what kind of cheating is permissible…

            • Cyborganism
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              No. Simply that Volkswagen, then another company was caught, then they went after all of them and they all admitted before they could look into each individual company.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Basically all of them have cheated. You needed good emission test results, but without having a miracle idea that evaded everyone else in the business you simply had no competitive results without cheating. That’s physics, and physics is a very hard and unforgiving ruler.

  • jafo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Once at work I said “My Audi sedan has a towing capacity of over 5,000 lbs, isn’t that crazy?” A coworker said “That’s almost as much as my Tacoma!” (Early 2000s model). Turns out 5,000 is closer to his combined vehicle weight + towing capacity.

    I remember my grandfather using the Grand Prix to tow and pull out stumps and stuff instead of the work truck.

    • ddkman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      The old Passat 4motion v6 diesels, B5.5 for those who want to know, were in fact bought by people who wanted to tow, because it had something insane like 3.5 tonnes of rated towing capacity. The 6mt ones anyway.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Diesel wagons are the absolute best daily drivers for most people that actually need a car. Great for long distances, great for towing, and the cargo space is amazing, while the balance of sporty handling and comfort is better than an SUV because with more mass and height, you just have to sacrifice comfort to get any sort of sportiness and of course nearly every manfuacturer does, so you end up with a more compromised ride quality.

      Of course short distances at cold temperatures are where diesels suck, but I mean, if you only drive short distances in the city, the car might be needed after all.

  • 34@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    But will it pull a camper for two that actually sleeps 10 at 85 mph up hill in a 65 mph speed zone?

  • Bucket_of_Truth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Its probably worth noting that Europeans get more powerful cars than we do here in the US. I drive a 02 Golf TDI and it was only available as a 1.9L 90hp front wheel drive. The base model in Europe has a bigger turbo and offers 4wd versions.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Diesel emissions regulations specifically are stricter in the US than in the EU. Gasoline emissions are not. And I guess pickup trucks aren’t cars so they might have different diesel emissions standards than cars?

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’ve also noticed the European versions of cars are rated to tow more. The Hyundai Ioniq I had wasn’t rated to tow anything in America. It would void my warranty. The European version was rated for 1000lbs or something like that. Europeans demand the ability to tow while I guess in America we just don’t expect a small car to do it.

      • Thadrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Probably a result of how legislation is designed for different towing strategies. From what I’ve seen, the US favors trailers with higher hitch weight and axles further back, requiring more substantial and heavy towing vehicles, but allowing for higher speeds. In Europe, trailers are more balanced with hitch weights in the 100-150lbs range, but speed limits are lower (50ish mph).

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well, in the US you only need to pay cash to get the law that you need. The best democracy money can buy.

          The same goes with laws like extending copyrights, forbidding selling cars without dealerships, low safety margins with rail cars transporting dangerous goods, no drinking breaks for people working in the heat, most modifications (mainly exceptions) in the tax code, etc, etc, etc. The list is long. Each one bought by someone with serious money against YOUR interests.

      • ddkman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Did your car have a factory tow hook option? Because on many cars the “tow hook” option, makes the car come with a bunch of stuff. A strengthened rear bar, often auxillary oil coolers for the gearbox, sometimes different final drive, restriction to only a MT, or a completely different gearbox alltogether. So maybe for some reason the US ioniq didn’t have the parts available that made the ioniq be safe to tow with…

        • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          No, it definitely wasn’t an option. If you see a hitch on small cars here in America, is usually just to mount something like a bike rack. Our cars just aren’t rated to tow.

      • ZC3rr0r
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        This was my exact point from earlier - most cars that can tow a bunch of stuff in Europe or Australia simply don’t get tow ratings here at all. And yes, manufacturers will void your waranty of you do tow anything. It’s infuriating.

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That’s crazy I didn’t realize they had such low horsepower. I guess that makes sense, a diesel engine has high torque. I have a 2017 golf tsi, and it gets around 170 horsepower for comparison. I have always loved and wanted one of those TDIs.

    • ddkman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The 02 had the 90 I think. But yeah obv. everybody bought the 116 the 131 or the 2liters.

    • Screeslope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You wouldn’t believe it, but they routinely haul these over major alpine passes. Works well on climbs, but sharp corners and switchbacks require careful handling, causing everyone else a bit of grief.

    • Nathandee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      The don’t… but the neighboring countries do. That’s where this caravan is going

      • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yanks are so accustomed to the idea that “more litres = more torque” that they actually can’t imagine the amount of engineering that’s gone in to smaller more efficient European and Japanese engines.

        ≈1hp per cc is pretty standard in modern cars but why invest in all that engineering when you can pour cheap gasoline down the throat of your 5 litre V8?

        • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The most popular pickup truck in the US is commonly bought with either a 2.7 liter turbo or 3.5 liter turbo v6, I think you’re a bit behind the times.

          • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            In 2018, the average engine in the UK was 1.61L, in 2022 in the US it is 3.42L (literally over twice the capacity), but yh, it’s me that’s behind the times.

            Edit: Imagine getting down voted because someone doesn’t like the data. No rebuttle, no counter data, nothing to show my data might be wrong, just burying it because you don’t like it lmao

              • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s called hyperbole. Although I wouldn’t say that it’s an extreme exaggeration, the sentiment remains.

                • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  And you’re still wrong. Most new cars in the US (other than sports cars) are using small turbocharged four cylinders. But keep trying to act like you know anything about cars in the US, it’s fun to watch.

  • jerry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    Just make sure it’s rated for the load you’re towing and whatever works.

    • Ooops@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      But that’s the point. The same exact same vehicle rated in Europe will not have any rating in the US and they will tell you how you need a truck to tow.

      • jerry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve found a tow rating for almost any car I’ve had, at least the past 15 years.

  • Destroyer Of Worlds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    if you saw the sheer scope of trailers, campers, Tour Bus RV’s, custom toy haulers etc that invade the coastal areas of where I live, you would realize the problem isn’t the semantics of tow vehicle size. the whole “adventure camping” myth when two people bring a 800 square foot Motorcoach with a car in tow makes me want to vomit. its like a car brain with sepsis. leave your fucking house at home.

    • czardestructo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Whenever I see a giant RV towing a giant SUV bigger than any of the vehicles I own I get a little frustrated and irritated. If you want to explore the country you can do it without taking every amenity and gadget from home. Just go out there, see and be in the world, don’t take the ‘world’ with you.

  • MeshPotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Been there as a kid in the 90s. Sitting in the back my my parents Toyota Carina with my 2 siblings, while we were towing a caravan.

    That car had a 2l, 4 cylinder petrol and got through the Alps and Pyrenees. Iwas more comfortable touring that way than going by tent only. Now I’m in Australia where I’m gobsmacked by how much shit people “need” to go camping. All while I’m exploring the same locations and actually spending more time camping in the bush as I tour on a tiny, economical 125cc motorcycle.

    Almost to prove a point, I took that little thing to Cape York and will take it RTW next year, partly to show that you don’t need much.

    • Thadrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, a lot of laws seem to favor trucks in the US. The vehicles aren’t different, the laws and regulations are.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well, the US has the best democracy money can buy, and someone paid a lot to make the worst kind of cars the de facto standard.

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    My camping setup fits in some boxes I have on my 650cc motorcycle. Don’t even need to tow anything.