• Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    LIED. He LIED, CNN. Say it!

    “Falsely claimed” for fuck’s sake, you spineless republiQan sewer holes.

    It’s been almost a goddamned decade CNN! WaPo? NYT? Looking at all you “falsely claimed” motherfuckers. When are you going to grow up? Hm? When are you going to actually do the work of journalism instead of your paper-thin republiQan brigading?

    • Trailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      “Lied” implies intent, which is a very squishy subject. I’d prefer they stick to just the facts, please. I’m no lawyer, but I suspect you might be asking for libel suits if you claim somebody lied and can’t actually prove that they did so intentionally.

      • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        They accuse them of bad journalism. Supposing intent you can’t prove is the definition of bad journalism. People need to temper their instinctual emotions a bit. I’m upset about Trump being a serial liar too (which I can say, because I’m a nobody who can totally infer his intent) but cmon, can we not leave the very foundations of factual journalism in the dust in our quest to right that wrong?

          • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Why does journalism need to spoonfeed people? Why can’t we take accountability? They report the facts. Facts are provable, with evidence. You can only very, very rarely prove intent with evidence. A lie is an untruth delivered with intent. They cannot prove that and as such should not report it. We, as readers, should then piece the facts together. They’re giving you facts, not teaching you how to think. It’s not their job.

            • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Because most people are NPCs. They’ve been spoonfed their information for a century, and before that they just knew nothing. There has never been, and likely never will be, a period in history where the average person actually is an independent rational actor. Most people are proles

              • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Of course you can prove he said that. That’s the untruth. Can you prove he knew he lied? You and I know that because it’s clear as day and we don’t need strict evidence, but journalists do because their job is to report facts and not assumptions, even obvious ones. It’s your job as a reader to take those facts and the surrounding context to construct what happened. They should not have to spoonfeed this to us in the exact verbiage we want just because we want to score a few more points because CNN said “lie”.

                And you should genuinely be ashamed of your reading comprehension. Your response does not make sense considering what I wrote above. I addressed that directly.

                • davidagain@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You should be ashamed of yourself for trying to find reasons to preposterously believe that Trump accidentally lied. We all know this is an outrageous lie. We all know he’s an outrageous liar. I’m not asking CNN or you to say so, though, I’m asking you not to overcomplicate a very simple, very obvious lie which has a very obvious motivation. No sane or rational judge or jury is going to believe that Trump was mistaken or that he told this untruth for anything other than self-serving reasons, and Trump isn’t going to sue CNN for libel on this open-and-shut case lie because he’s neck-deep in legal costs and court cases already.

      • davidagain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Let me get this straight: You’re not sure whether Trump did deliberately claim that he didn’t say, repeatedly, often, publicly, on the TV and on social media “lock her up”? You think he accidentally denied saying it, or you have come to doubt your recollection of “LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!”?

        • Ozymati@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m thinking it doesn’t matter what we think, it matters which one could accrue expensive court costs. Because “false claim” is specific and provable, “lied” is murky and general. When it comes to libel and slander lawsuits, the legal system runs on semantics and pedantry.

          Why should they open themselves to that kind of legal system enabled retribution? After all, we all know whose pants are on fire.

          • davidagain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Trump would most definitely lose a libel case trying to claim that his obvious lie with transparent self-serving motivation was accidental or correct. He’s way too deep in legal costs and court cases to make an absurd suit like that, and there’s no point doing it because he doesn’t care that people know he’s an out and out liar.

            • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              A libel case is different.

              The problem is Trump could claim “oops I forgot that I agreed with the crowd in 2016” and that is different than intentionally lying. That’s why journalists have to split hairs here; George Santos can be called a liar but saying Trump lied this time is harder. It opens a can of worms; when Biden inevitably gets a detail wrong in another story of his should they call him a liar?

              • davidagain@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                This isn’t a detail, this was a campaign slogan. No one in their right mind would believe Trump didn’t know exactly what he was doing both then and now. Stop trying to introduce doubt where there is none, it’s absurd. (And no, he doesn’t want to spend more time and money in court right now.)

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        In a weird way I agree with both you and the person you replied to. My own personal doublethink, I suppose.

  • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    7 months ago

    Even for Trump, this one is a lot. It was essentially his campaign slogan. He didn’t just say it, he led chants of it in front of crowds.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    7 months ago

    Read this earlier today and it just blew my mind… I mean, he said it during a bunch of his rallies and invented the “lock her up” thing

  • Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 months ago

    If Trump is claiming something, falsely is how he is going to do it.

  • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 months ago

    those fake videos aren’t me. Those are deep fakes from the deep state. I don’t remember saying that! No one I know, good people, remember that. This is the first time I’ve heard of Hillary Clinton!!

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      Proof of senility or a bald faced lie.

      Either way, just one more reason he’s unfit.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 months ago

    Of course he said that. How is anyone even surprised at this point? Since Day 1 he’s been saying whatever he wants to be true at the time - creating his own “reality” - and his base goes with it. He’s never been burdened by the truth, and there’s been no repercussions for his flagrant lying. Yes, this is an outrageous lie, but even in that it’s unremarkable.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Republicans are NOT in a Cult and TOTALLY think for Themselves and they BELIEVE this while wearing “Lock Her Up” shirts!