In country where anyone is caught with drugs has their head cut off in ooen public. Anyone caught in the act of homosexuality is publicly hung. A mother who attempts to have her child killed, she herself is killed. You can never fight authoritarian regimes until you decide that it’s better for you to die or be killed in the fight than to let the regime continue. Forget about North America, forget about Europe, pay attention to other places where national governments are holding weekly executions in 2024 for citizens not obeying government mandates.
I’m not advocating (except for feeding pigeons). I’m telling things that are crimes in some locations. I really think you have reading comprehension issues.
Don’t worry, I understand. Nobody likes being prevent wrong. You’ll survive, I’m sure.
No, it’s the implications of individual terms that you have already posted. You say it is an individual right commit geneocide and mass murder. Look at your own terms that you said. It doesn’t matter the intent behind your words if that’s not what you meant. You used the terms, therefore you want the free exercise of genocide of humans and mass murder as fit.
In country where anyone is caught with drugs has their head cut off in ooen public. Anyone caught in the act of homosexuality is publicly hung. A mother who attempts to have her child killed, she herself is killed. You can never fight authoritarian regimes until you decide that it’s better for you to die or be killed in the fight than to let the regime continue. Forget about North America, forget about Europe, pay attention to other places where national governments are holding weekly executions in 2024 for citizens not obeying government mandates.
That’s a very interesting deflection. Care to address my point?
I did address it, like you advocating for indiscriminate homocide but not discriminate homocide, only indiscriminate homocide you support.
It seems English is not your first or last language, given your comprehension and way of “speaking”.
I didn’t advocate for any of this. Those are examples of things that can be crimes in many places, and do not have ill intent or hate.
You’re not recognizing the implications of your own words and what the terms you use openly advocate for.
I’m not advocating (except for feeding pigeons). I’m telling things that are crimes in some locations. I really think you have reading comprehension issues.
Don’t worry, I understand. Nobody likes being prevent wrong. You’ll survive, I’m sure.
No, it’s the implications of individual terms that you have already posted. You say it is an individual right commit geneocide and mass murder. Look at your own terms that you said. It doesn’t matter the intent behind your words if that’s not what you meant. You used the terms, therefore you want the free exercise of genocide of humans and mass murder as fit.
What? Are you saying that to say “genocide” is to want the free exercise of genocide? To say there are unjust laws is to say they are rightful?
How can the intent and the meaning be different?
Is this a prank or are you still deflecting? I mean, talk about digging yourself into a hole. You went from slightly silly to full lunatic.
But I guess anything before admitting that a quote you heard somewhere doesn’t really hold water if you don’t understand it.