• Alto@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    How much of this is due to vehicle life expectancy improving and how much of it is nobody can afford a new car. Obviously it’s not purely the later, because vehicle do (generally) last longer these days, but it’s not like everyone was driving their vehicles into the dirt previously.

  • cerement@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    “[Prices are] prohibitively high for a lot of households now,” said Todd Campau, aftermarket leader for S&P Global Mobility. “So I think consumers are being painted into the corner of having to keep the vehicle on the road longer.”

    • Cyborganism
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Plus have to seen the new models??? It’s all touchscreens everywhere.

      You can’t even drive at night in those things because you get blinded by all the light from the screens covering you entire dashboard.

      You wanna use the car infotainment system? Bitch you gotta download the app on your phone so we can collect your data.

      Wanna listen to some music? Haha bitch you gotta navigate the touchscreen interface to the radio app and then find the part of the surface of the glass to adjust the volume.

      Wanna turn in the hradlights at night? You gotta pay for the monthly subscription of 50$/month for that feature, you bitch!

  • iamdisillusioned@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    This year my car turns 14 (Kia) and my husband’s turns 22 (Acura). We consider ourselves to be “car people” and we probably would have replaced them sooner but the type of vehicles that we like are not very popular (sporty coupes and small lightweight trucks). We’ve been lucky and had to do very minimal maintenance so far.

  • Dreizehn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    It goes to show automobile prices are increasing and US income distribution is f’n piss poor.

  • Onii-Chan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I drive a 2009 Crown Hybrid. It’s fast, it’s reliable, it’s great on fuel, it’s luxurious, the build quality is extremely high, and on top of that, it didn’t cost much. I can’t see what a new car could offer me other than touchscreens, mandatory data collection, and a heap of tech I’ll never use more than once. Mine has radar cruise, that’s as advanced as I need a feature to be tbh

    • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Wow they had that in 09? I can’t live without that anymore. Beware Nissan’s implementation though, it suddenly disables with a tone if you’re fully stopped in traffic more than 10s. Complete trash.

      • Onii-Chan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Toyota really weren’t fucking around with the Crown Hybrids back then. They threw everything into them. It also has soft close doors and trunk, TV/DVD, factory Bluetooth audio, heated/cooled front and rear seats, reclining rear seats, lane keep assist, night vision front and fender/rear cameras, keyless everything, and a heap more.

        I fucking love the Toyota Crown.

      • Inktvip@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ve borrowed a top spec Audi A6 from 2004 for a bit last year and that had adaptive cruise control as well. Honestly if not for the infotainment GUI, which felt very “spy kids”, it would have passed for a ~2020 car as well feature wise.

        • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Hmm… I wonder where the cutting edge currently is at this point? I had no idea they’d been experimenting with radar in automotive applications that far back!

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well yeah. 12.6 years is the average in the states, not the upper limit. See plenty of pre-2000 accords and the like daily.

        • Alto@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          You guys have pretty strict regulations regarding emissions on older cars over there right? Could swear I saw a Tom Scott video on the subject or something.

          I’m surprised it’s that much lower though, given at least the general perception around the reliability of American vs German cars. Wonder how much brands like Honda and Toyota are offsetting that.

  • geekworking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Covid and the remote work change likely contributed. Not having to commute every day has saved a lot of miles on people’s cars.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also the fact that new cars are insanely expensive these days. Study after study comes out saying consumers aren’t spending in weird ways, but it’s because the economy is essentially in a recession but no one wants to admit it.

  • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Pretty sure it’s more impactful on the environment to get a new car than it is to continue using the car you have if you can.

    People should be running their current ones into the ground, and only getting another when necessary (ideally EV or some other mode of transport with even fewer emissions).

    We don’t need to replace our cars, just reduce the amount on the road and minimize emissions of new ones.

    I think it’s somewhere around 20-30% of emissions are from vehicles (plz don’t quote me on that), so it’s at least a step in the right direction and would slow the progression for sure.