• deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s software that also serves as a method to distribute and access it. But ultimately, it doesn’t matter, the resulting pushback will be the same.

    The conclusion of the study was basically that the biggest players should enter the fediverse in order to use their capabilities to scan and police it.

    Wherever this shit exists, unwanted attention and scrutiny will follow, while the reputation of the platform will be harmed.

    • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This will literally do nothing, the people conducting the study obviously have absolutely no idea how federation and the fediverse in general work…

      And the big Players will be thrown out by everyone else, we are here because we hate them.

      • Kayn@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        the people conducting the study obviously have absolutely no idea how federation and the fediverse in general work…

        How do you know that?

        • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          Study:

          Mastodon = Server hoster

          Mastodon = Responsible for content

          Mastodon = able to moderate

          Reality:

          Mastodon ≠ Server hoster

          Mastodon ≠ Responsible for content

          Mastodon ≠ able to moderate

          • Kayn@dormi.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Where does the study suggest the Mastodon software’s ability to moderate, or that it’s responsible for content?

              • Kayn@dormi.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Did you read the actual study that this article refers to?

                Going by your lack of further response, I’m going to assume you didn’t, otherwise you’d have noticed that you’re wrong. I recommend reading the sources of articles in the future before commenting on them.

    • recursive_recursion [they/them]@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The conclusion of the study was basically that the biggest players should enter the fediverse in order to use their capabilities to scan and police it.

      Not sure if that would work as users are fleeing from those big players as they don’t prioritize the safety and needs of their users.

      The contradictory problem is that current major corporations prioritize money at all costs even at the expense of their users so their customer base flee to the next best service/product provider.

      People are currently abandoning Reddit and Twitter because their moderation system either doesn’t work or has underlying contradictions to what users are asking for.

      Facebook launched Threads and people only joined initially due to FOMO. With how transparent they are in harvesting user data at the expense of people’s privacy I think (and hope) that people are starting to realize that this is probably not in their best interests.

      I think what we’re seeing is evolutionary filtration of the web similar to natural ecosystems where the species with the highest ability to adapt that survives.

      Based off of one metric it seems that companies structured around proprietary software (zero-sum systems) are unsustainable. This is my untested observation however so this could be true currently but systemically wrong once examined and tested.

      So the idea that

      biggest players should enter the fediverse in order to use their capabilities to scan and police it.

      doesn’t seem to make the most logical sense as the foundation for those companies is untrustworthy and unsustainable.