Lemmy.ca
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
CDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year ago

Same cost, same loadout.

sh.itjust.works

message-square
32
link
fedilink
107

Same cost, same loadout.

sh.itjust.works

CDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
32
link
fedilink

r*ddit

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Jumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll take the Flugabwehrkanonenpanzerkampfwagen Gepard instead.

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Germans always have a mouthful

      • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Flugabwehrkanonenpanzerkampfwagen Gepard

        It literally means “aerial-defense-cannon-armoured-battle-vehicle cheetah”. Not shorter in English.

        German doesn’t have longer words, it’s just that you can stick together existing words to make up new words. For example, “the front door of the house” in German is “Haustür”, literally “housedoor”. It goes on logically, like “the handle of the front door of the house” is Haustürklinke, literally housedoorhandle. This way it is possible to make up arbitrarily long words which becime ever more specific, just without a tonne of “of” in between.

        • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But general usage is rarely more than 2 or 3 short words stuck together. Stuff like Vorratskasten and Notreserve or Fliegengitter. Well, ok, there’s stuff like Insektenbekämpfungsmittel.

          • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Rindfleischettiketierungsüberwachungsaufgabenübertragungsgesetz.

        • Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Löngenwordenmaken

        • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know why I read the door handle as Haustürk-linke. Love me a house turkish leftist.

        • ferret@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          US Military would probably call it “ADCABC Cheetah” because indecipherable acronyms are much better.

          • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sometimes they’re funny though, like the ATTACK-EMS and the ASSRAMMING missiles

          • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m pretty sure US Army would designate it the M1.

  • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who’s my ground crew?

    • nuke@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      1 year ago

      The 1989 Denver Broncos

      • chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Settle down, Mrs. Cartman

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Offense or defense?

        Because Chan Gailey or Wade Phillips

  • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Depends on the radar sensitivity and the target acquisition software. More plane might not be more better if they can’t lock on a target as small as a drone.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an American, 100 F16s.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      3,000 gray f-16s of uncle Sam.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      No no as an American 300 super tucanos slower speed, higher loiter time, lower cost.

    • SpaghettiYeti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Best I can do is 4600

  • Krafty Kactus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Depends on what their loadouts look like but probably the second option. 100 drones is a lot of small targets and I’m not quite certain F16s have the numbers of missiles. I could be wrong though.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why are you bringing up F15s?

      • Krafty Kactus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eternity doesn’t let me see images in the post I’m replying to and I thought it had said F15

  • maculata@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Could I please choose one elephant-sized goose?

  • Heavybell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    How many anti-drone drones for the same money?

  • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll take a bunch of Oerlikon Skynexes https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bdwjcayPuag

    • tomatolung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good choice, although the swiss aren’t selling to Ukraine apparently (veto’ed several transfers). There are a few other CIWS systems which would also be good. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYJ2KKnl6kA

  • Gustephan@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bring back the sparkvark. Or like, when they finally retire the bone, hollow out the airframe, toss in a few hundred MW of generators and let it saturation jam the entire timezone

  • Nomecks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the money? I’ll take the underground, steel reinforced concrete bunker.

  • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    With 100 drones all I need is one queen, and they will all try to follow her to mate with her.

  • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    How much drones could you have for that cost?

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    All at once, or spread out over a period of time? Because I’d take the F16s in most scenarios.

NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.works

noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be nice

Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a “credible” source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it’s non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don’t care if you’re Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don’t want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how “open source” and “easy to find” it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody’s art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art’s source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a “haha people that I hate died… haha” punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don’t be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Banner made by u/Fertility18

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 15 users / day
  • 1.82K users / week
  • 2.29K users / month
  • 8.54K users / 6 months
  • 154 local subscribers
  • 7.5K subscribers
  • 2.32K Posts
  • 30.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Shit@sh.itjust.works
  • OttoVonNoob
    cake
  • Fisting for Freedom@sh.itjust.works
  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
  • nuke@sh.itjust.works
  • skillissuer@sh.itjust.works
  • Estiar@sh.itjust.works
  • neidu2@feddit.nl
  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
  • UI: 0.19.11
  • BE: 0.19.11-n.1
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org