• projectd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    80% of soy is fed to animals for humans to exploit, so not really sure what you’re getting at.

    A plant based diet eliminates the vast majority of animal suffering (bonus points for reduced climate destruction, antibiotic degradation and future pandemic likelihood)

    • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      A plant based diet in the current food system produces massive amounts of animal suffering. If everything more complex than a nematode is sentient then you just have to accept that sentient suffering is the price for a large human population no matter what they are eating.

      • whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Sure, but you can’t let perfection be the enemy of progress.

        That would be like saying, “Antibiotics cause digestive upset, and you already have a deadly bacterial infection in your colon causing digestive upset, so you’re just going to have to accept the infection because the antibiotics aren’t going to fix the digestive upset.”

        The plants are already being grown. Whatever animal suffering exists from the plant being grown is going to exist either way. What we can do is eliminate or reduce the middle layer of additional animal suffering that comes from raising animals for food.

      • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        You produce far more animal suffering by farming/eating animals. Most of those animals people eat have to be fed, you know.