In theory, tax payer paid healthcare is a good idea. In theory.

      • Bongo_Stryker
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting take! I’d be curious to hear any thoughts on the Friedman doctrine as it relates to healthcare, and in broader terms of social services or just in general.

          • Bongo_Stryker
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well now just hold on a gosh darned minute there Mr. Flippy Mcflopper, “A plumber should not be paying for your gender studies degree” and yet you want me to pay for treatment of people who gave themselves diabetes by eating too much heavily subsidized sugar?

            Anyway if you are slowly coming around to democratic socialism thinking that’s great and I won’t tell anyone, but you should realize education is as important as healthcare to a functioning society.

              • Bongo_Stryker
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I just don’t think profit should be the core of the medical system due to inelastic demand.

                I agree with you, comrade.

                Germany was about 24%. So if you are willing to allow only 24% of people to have degrees then sure

                Well I happen to believe that anything Germany can do, America can do better. We put man on the moon, did Germany do that? Why, I bet with a little American ingenuity and determination, we could get up to 60% of Americans to have degrees in gender studies.

    • ImplyingImplications
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s here because Canada is the only country in the world with tax payer paid healthcare. Wait, what? Most countries in the world have tax payer paid healthcare? I meant in North America. Wait, what? Mexico has tax payer paid healthcare too?

    • Kaboom@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, because liberals killed a disabled person with horrid policy. You got it backwards.

      • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Explain how a single patient death is a valid argument against the thousands (probably more) of times privatized, profit-driven healthcare in the US has done that or worse.

        When you look at who is preserving and enabling this situation, it’s congressional conservatives. Look at their voting records. Review C-SPAN coverage and watch it actually happen. You cannot manipulate reality with online arguments, only accept/reject it.

        What you have right here is a straw man argument. A single case is anecdotal, the trend however is much more important.

  • uziBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Liberals want a government funded health care system paid for by government taking other people’s money and imprison everybody who won’t give their money to the government, they demand a ban to private healthcare, but when there’s no money for government to provide thorough treatment, they want people executed or killed off to save government money.

    They say it’s better for all people to suffer than for some individuals to do well.