By Lauren Fernandez / CTV News

  • Dearche
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    From a societal standpoint, the lack of children is harmful on quite a few levels. The obvious is the lack of population growth, and an aging society. But the issues that stem from that are pretty serious. On the top level, most of millennials won’t be able to experience retirement like how the boomers are, as there isn’t enough young people to support the aging population, and few millennials will 20mil in the bank when they reach 65.

    On the other side, the GenZ and future generations are inheriting a world that’s been ravaged by rampant consumption, and they themselves don’t have the numbers to do much about it. Entire towns are being abandoned with the environments around them being left as messed up as ever because nobody is around to even notice that abandoned factory from 30 years ago had tons of toxic chemicals left over when the company left the town and never got cleaned up. And even if it is noticed, the potential to clean any of that up is evaporating as there’s just less people to do something about it.

    And that doesn’t even get into how there’s fewer people doing essential jobs. And I’m not just talking about the blue collar void. Do you remember how much the farmers were complaining that they didn’t have enough hands to harvest their crops during the worst of COVID?

    Hell, I’ve seen entire neighbourhoods that’s had help wanted signs posted for more than a year straight. We’re already starting to see the early onset of labour shortage, and Canada’s one of the few top tier countries that has managed decent population growth thanks to our immigrants. Imagine how bad it is in Europe and East Asia?

    That said, from an individual level, the governments, on every level, are really failing to create an environment where people can decently have children in the first place. When you work full time and constantly worry about making your bills, you have significantly less leeway to think about something that’ll add massively to your payments.

    Even dating is difficult under those circumstances, not to mention hookup culture that basically treat long term relationship as a thing of the past.

    Marriage, and then having a child instead of a pet? Forgettaboutit. Not when a significant percentage of the population is already living paycheck to paycheck. One wrong move, and they’re heading right into bankruptcy. Not the sort of environment to have children.

    • Cyborganism@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, there’s too many people on earth and we need to curb the population growth.

      Also this constant growth from companies isn’t realistic. Our resources are not infinite. We had to hit a wall at some point and start to decrease.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Native population growth is ALREADY curbed in nearly all Indusrialized Nations and places like the US are only growing due to immigration.

        The global population keeps climbing because of under and still developing countries…and even in those places their rate of growth is slowing.

        Globally the population will hit max around the year 2100 but many rich nations already heat peak population and are now declining.

        • Dearche
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This doesn’t even take into consideration that we’re doing a terrible job utilizing our resources as things stand as well.

          I think it was something like 70%+ of all food crops grown go to feeding livestock, with something like 70% of that being to growing beef. And of the 30% or so that goes to non-livestock (which includes pets), about half of it is wasted. I mean, it’s not just kitchen waste, but farmers frequently throw away entire hectares of their crop just because they couldn’t sell it. Not to mention how much is thrown out along the way to a person’s home because they’re not pretty enough.

          And if people argue that even if we fix that, that’ll only give us a bit more leeway, there’s a bunch of alternative farming that are capable of getting yields massively greater than traditional farming. Not only growing crops 24/7, but in environments that growing isn’t normally possible. And then there’s vertical farming that basically allows to stack fields ontop of each other.

          And if energy is the problem, the issue there is that nobody wants to invest in better forms of power generation because of disinformation. Nuclear is insanely clean and safe. Fewer people have died from nuclear compared to any other form of energy generation, even measuring by watt. Yes, even wind has killed more people than nuclear due to accidents during installation and maintenance.