• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    213
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    So, wait, Mocrosoft is finally giving us a way to fully-disable automatic Windows Updates?

    /s

  • OtterOPA
    link
    English
    121
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Full list from this comment on another thread: https://lemmy.ca/comment/8470544

    ConisioAdmin.exe (Solidworks PDM)

    EaseUS Disk Copy.exe (EaseUS Disk Copy Application)

    ep_dwm.exe (ExplorerPatcher) Included since 22H2

    iCloudServices.exe (iCloud files shared in Explorer via WhatsApp) from 23H2

    RadeonSoftware.exe (AMD GPU perf settings) from23H2

    StartAllBackCfg.exe (StartAllBack) Included since 22H2

    Multi-mon + Copilot (Microsoft)

    MergeSdb (Microsoft)

    Intel IntcOED.sys (Intel)

    Intel IntcAudioBus.sys (Intel) (%WinDir%\System32\drivers\IntcAudioBus.sys)

    Realtek 8192su Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter (Realtek) (%WinDir%\System32\drivers\RTL8192su.sys)

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        391 month ago

        The article says it’s only a specific Win7 version of VLC that’s blocked, so maybe that’s the case with these also.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          191 month ago

          Ok, so a newer version should be fine I guess. If that’s the case, the title should be: “If you’re still running these prehistoric software, Windows won’t be able to update“

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 month ago

              Yeah, and the headline is supposed to maximize the clicks, along with your fear, hatred and rage.

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 month ago

            i’m still not really sure why this would matter. Does updating break that software? Seems like an easy fix.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              That was a weird article. The simplest fix would be to keep your apps updated.

              Although, in typical MS style, the error message will probably be either vague and cryptic or otherwise completely useless. If you stumble upon an update problem like this, troubleshooting it doesn’t sound fun.

      • bitwolf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        Or software made by Microsoft themselves!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 month ago

      Will it stop asking me to upgrade every month if I have one of these installed? I might need to get one just for that.

    • @stealth_cookies
      link
      English
      101 month ago

      Hmm, interesting, do these all have explorer integrations? I know even a couple year’s old SolidWorks PDM does not work with Windows 11 because of the way it integrates with Windows explorer. a couple of the other apps there modify/integrate into explorer as well.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Realtek 8192su Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter

      Wow, how did they break that? Signing issue maybe?

  • Hello Hotel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    68
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This stops Windows 11 from blocking the installation and lets you get the app back onto your PC. We’re not sure if Microsoft has fixed this trick, but it’s worth a shot if you want to keep using your favorite apps.

    That’s mildly distopian.

    This prevents your car from shutting itself off when trying visit certain areas on the map. We’re not sure if car manufacturers have fixed this trick, but it’s worth a shot if you want to keep going to your favorite places.

    And only a little tiny bit adversarial.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This is what ive been saying about windows vs Linux for years.

      Linux isnt necessarily easy, but its collaborative and everybody’s on the same side.

      Windows is PvP, and now I’m seeing fucking Hangul characters in chat, and I’m afraid. I don’t even use it anymore.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Lol. :)

            My wife is Korean and I noped out of playing StarCraft when I visited her family. I also worked with a “minor-league” StarCraft player (played on Euro servers with a team) and a regular Korean guy, and it was always close when we’d do lan games at work afterhours (us normies would die off early and watch as those two duked it out).

            So yeah, I get it. Koreans are hardcore…

  • kingthrillgore
    link
    fedilink
    English
    501 month ago

    Wouldn’t it be nice if you could just keep using Windows 10 forever, and get security updates for free?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -351 month ago

      For reference: Debian 6 which was the current release of Debian at the time Windows 10 was released hasn’t received official security patches 2016, CentOS 6.6 stopped receiving them 2022. Mac OS X Yosemite latest update was released 2017…

      • Krzd
        link
        fedilink
        English
        331 month ago

        Yeah and? Debian is free, you can just upgrade to the newer version without paying a thing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          301 month ago

          And upgrades tend to be pretty stable. You can still use whatever UX you were used to before, since packages tend to stick around quite a bit.

          The issue with Win 11 is that it drastically changes hardware requirements and UX. That’s not an issue for Debian.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 month ago

            And because linux is 99% just the programs you install on it when you do upgrade to a new version you aren’t being forced into a new system. This is why distro wars are pointless.

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            131 month ago

            would you like to explain to me how i install a tpm 2.0 module into my hardware for free exactly?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 month ago

            I cannot use my win11 laptop because they removed the language bar and switching keyboard layout is impossible. Unfortunately it’s something that I do on the regular since programming in my native layout is really difficult hunting down alt+some numbers for the {} and I need letters with accents like žšć when I write something

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        291 month ago

        Windows 10 was released on July 29, 2015, Debian 8 was released on 26 April 2015, 3 months earlier. And you are comparing it with Debian 6, released 4 years earlier? Debian 8 extended long term support reaches end-of-life 30 June 2025.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 month ago

          You are right. I misinterpreted the information on wiki page. Debian 8’s free LTS tier ended 2020 and the Extended LTS continues until 2025. Extended support is a paid service though and costs a lot more than a single Windows license. Microsoft offers a similar (also paid) service.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 month ago

        It’s comparing apples to oranges, that said, the current version of Debian is much closer to the UX of Debian 6 than windows 11 is to windows 10

        If the point of windows is you’re paying for an operating system and should then have better support than a free alternative, they should be able to push security updates, especially if they’re already committed to ensuring old windows app can still run inside new windows

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          Mac OS is Apple to oranges against windows when it comes to OS support?

          Conveniently skipped that part and focused on Debian…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            No, it’s not apples to oranges because Mac and windows are both paid support.

            If you want to compare apples to apples, then sure, Mac is better than windows. That’s a low bar to beat though. I was comparing apples to oranges, which was a comparison in paid vs free support.

            But yes, macs desktop environment and user experience hasn’t taken half as much of a dump as windows. But they’re also based on Linux, and don’t have to make the same commitments windows does

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              macOS is not based on Linux, it’s based on FreeBSD (and other BSD) userspace and the Mach kernel. AFAIK, there isn’t any Linux code there.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 month ago

          They did provide security updates for several years longer than any competitor. Even (or especially depending on your point of view) for a company like Microsoft a user shouldn’t expect updates indefinitely at least not for the normal retail price.

          And to be clear: I also don’t want to blame any of the named Linux distros. I recently migrated an old CentOS 6 server and it was about time. Sure there were still some security updates but several software components hadn’t received updates for years and there were a lot of workarounds necessary to keep the thing in a somewhat decent and modern state.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 month ago

        windows 10 was meant to be the last version of windows, its a bit disingenuous to compare the two that way

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          Ughh i hate reading this hoax. W10 was never the last version of windows. It’s a paraphrased report of one engineer at Microsoft that said that, but it was never in any official capacity confirmed

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The Verge asked a rep at Microsoft, and this is what they said:

            When I reached out to Microsoft about Nixon’s comments, the company didn’t dismiss them at all. “Recent comments at Ignite about Windows 10 are reflective of the way Windows will be delivered as a service bringing new innovations and updates in an ongoing manner, with continuous value for our consumer and business customers,” says a Microsoft spokesperson in a statement to The Verge. “We aren’t speaking to future branding at this time, but customers can be confident Windows 10 will remain up-to-date and power a variety of devices from PCs to phones to Surface Hub to HoloLens and Xbox. We look forward to a long future of Windows innovations.”

            So they didn’t rule out branding changes, but the changes to Win 11 seem like a pretty big change from Win 10, which seems to go against the “Windows will be delivered as a service” statement. So it’s not just that one engineer, but probably a broader push (that may have been delayed or scrapped) to push gradual updates consistently instead of larger, periodic updates. I’m no expert, but I didn’t really see much difference in how Win 10 was released vs previous versions (e.g. XP, 7, and 10 all had service packs).

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            frankly as long as my windows 10 license is valid in windows 11, i couldn’t care less.

            But you still wouldn’t find me using windows 11.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            Wasn’t the entire point of not using “Windows 9” branding and instead going straight to “Windows 10” from 8 that they didn’t want the last version of Windows to be 9, that they preferred a nice round number.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              No. The point was they didn’t want issues from badly written software that used a “windows 9*” string to check for 95/98

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 month ago

            well the way they stopped making new windows versions after 10 (until now) seems to indicate that was the plan

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        the cool thing about debian though, you can just reinstall that shit. Or if you like flying close to the sun. Just change your apt sources. And hope nothing explodes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          My vps was two Debian versions late and both upgrade went super smooth. Did it fromy damn phone even.

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            i imagine it’s a bit of gamble sometimes, depends on how much software was deprecated changed or moved around, a lot can happen in a support period. Regardless spinning up a new install in an automated manner should be relatively trivial, and probably something anyone can accomplish for backup purposes.

        • @sndmn
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          deleted by creator

  • Australis13
    link
    fedilink
    441 month ago

    I was already dubious about upgrading from 10 to 11 and this is final straw. I will have to look at Linux options and see if my Windows-only programs will run effectively under WINE.

    • chingadera
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 month ago

      I’m fucking out. I do a lot of basic IT work, including many fresh installs and new domain users, and I am so godamn sick of having to go through 5 dialogues every single time I open edge. For the local account. Then the domain admin account. Then the domain user account. Fuck this company.

      As soon as I can afford to get an AMD GPU or do a swap with someone for my 1070, I’m gone. I used to love computers, but dealing with windows even on a home PC with no “problems”, it just feels like more work.

      • lemmyvore
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 month ago

        You can do it with an Nvidia GPU too, you don’t have to switch cards. I’m not sure where this idea comes from, that Nvidia doesn’t work on Linux, 50-60% of users are on Nvidia according to Steam.

        • Whayle
          link
          fedilink
          101 month ago

          It’s because out of the box there’s often issues. For example, my setup with a 3080 booted to a black screen at login. Only futzing in the command prompt via grub let me install the correct driver, and it’s been fine ever since then.

          • lemmyvore
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            All drivers have to deal with fbdev and EFI DRM shenanigans and there’s no simple solution (if you insist on hiding boot messages behind pretty graphics, or having a graphical console, which most distros do unfortunately, God forbid you should kernel and system messages for 3 seconds).

            Until the ancient fbdev stuff will finally be completely obsolete it’s all about compromise. Most often the distro will have a working default, in some corner cases it will backfire. Personally I set my console to text only so I don’t have to deal with any of this.

            TLDR it can happen, and not necessarily on Nvidia.

        • chingadera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          Well shit, I’m not sure where it came from either, but I took it at face value. Thanks, I’ll be looking into this

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 month ago

        You can disable or streamline that stuff with either group policy or registry keys.

        I used to do the same work (several years ago) and I started researching fixes and writing scripts to speed up my work.

        Make a to do list of what your computer setup process is. Figure out the earliest you can launch a script (netshare or usb). Then start writing scripts for your tasks.

        Installing apps, file transfers and system configs.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That seems like a lot of convoluted bullshit just to get your os to work, considering you need to update the whole thing every week.

          You sure you haven’t tried arch? Openbsd? You sound like a typical user.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 month ago

            I’m talking about supporting an American enterprise environment that handles medical patient data. No Linux workstations really. Easier to comply with HIPAA that way.

            Is it convoluted BS? Sure why not. But Microsoft services are really sticky once you get integrated at a large scale (5k workstations plus over 100 servers).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 month ago

              And when they withdraw support for that feature, do you think laws will cause all the computers to crash?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 month ago

            Because you’re a level 1~2 technician hired in to support an enterprise windows environment and you have no choice.

        • chingadera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          Unfortunately our setup is not that sophisticated and neither am I. It’s a goal we’re working toward, but we’re just caught in a loop doing archaic shit because the workload is too high to fix it.

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          or you could just use linux.

          Sounds like the same level of effort, and it doesn’t try and fight you every possible step of the way.

          • chingadera
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 month ago

            As mentioned above, this is corporate work and it’s not as easy to sell as Microsoft

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          I’m going AMD next as well, pop wouldn’t run games on my 3080, finally got some running on endeavourOS currently but pop and fedora had lots of issues.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            PopOS has been running games fine on my 3070 for many years at this point. It might be worth another try.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              I just tried in February but could be because of the protocol either Wayland or X11, I run 2 1440p 144hz monitors and I think Wayland struggles with that. Have had better luck with arch and KDE x11

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                It could be Wayland issues with Nvidia, I use three higher res monitors, but only 60Hz in X11.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Worth considering holding onto the Nvidia card to do a vfio windows VM as a fallback for stuff that doesn’t run well through wine/proton. It wasn’t too hard to setup and its nice to just toss all the games with kernel anticheat/adobe shit into.

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        oh for what it’s worth. I’ve been using my 1070 under arch with nvidia drivers for years now. It’s problematic sometimes, and configuration is a mess. But it generally works perfectly fine.

        It’ll work more than well enough just to test the waters in linux though.

        although, to be clear, i am still on X, i hear it’s worse on wayland. But I’d say X is worthwhile if you’re savvy enough. It’s an interesting piece of software history. (and it rarely updates)

        • chingadera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          This seems promising, do you have any resources I can check out to accomplish the switch? I’ve used some Linux, mostly Debian, so really don’t think it would be all that tough to go through.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            You could check out distros like mint, zorinOS, fedora, popos, and Nobara. I think all of those will come with nvidia drivers so you don’t have to set them up manually. Nobara in particular is set up for gaming out of the box, I don’t know how well it actually works personally. You could just install Ventoy on a USB stick then load up multiple Linux distros on it, then just select the one you one to try live at boot. Mint and zorin will be the most familiar.

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            uhm, me. Or any of the various communities and forums that exist around the internet here are bound to have helpful people. Personally, i bumped to manjaro for a week. And once i was comfortable with it, i learned how to manually install arch linux. From there everything seemed doable, and it pretty much is 4 years later.

            I would say it depends on your level of tech savvyness though, if you’re highly savvy, and feel like you could manage it, then i’d say you should give it a shot. If not, there are plenty of simpler distros like mint that will keep your experience heavily curated, muta recently did a video about installing mint actually.

            Personally i wouldn’t recommend manjaro, it’s not that it’s bad, it’s just kind of a mess. Long story. Installing arch linux manually or at least skimming through the guide gives you a great idea of what the general linux system is constructed of. Very useful if you ever run into problems with GRUB or something.

            If you’ve used debian before and managed, you’d probably be fine, debian is a great choice for a workstation if you just don’t want to think about it very much. It’ll have a lot of old software, but it’s incredibly stable. IMO, the best advice i can give is to spin up a vm, fuck around, and see what you like. Linux is about choice, exercising it is part of the process.

            Oh uh, just don’t dualboot with windows, windows has a nasty propensity for nuking disks randomly sometimes, every so often a windows update will wipeout grub (it’s an easy fix but annoying and pretty daunting, if you’ve never done it before) on installs, it can sometime overwrite drives to place a bootloader there, i have no idea why.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 month ago

      If they’re games, protondb (.com) will tell you how well you can expect them to run. Other stuff, it’s often a case of search the web or try and see. Wine takes some getting used to, you’ll probably have to get your hands dirty and do a little learning.

      • Australis13
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        Good to know. I don’t play many games, but do have some older ones from GoG that would be nice to keep.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Probably a good starting place would be to take the three apps you need most, and just search the web for guides to running them on Linux. That’ll give you an indication of how much work you might/not be in for.

          e: also if a guide says “just run this shell script” even chance it’s not just that simple.

    • sab
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’m sure you’re aware of it already, but WineHQ provides a good overview over which software runs well under WINE. :)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      In the article all apps mentioned are very old versions. I just don’t understand, how exactly this was a final straw for you?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        Because they shouldn’t be doing this at all. The versions of the apps in question, and even which specific apps, are complete irrelevant.

      • Australis13
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        Because I haven’t yet updated from Windows 10 to 11 and had been putting it off. In the past week, though, I have seen a number of news articles highlighting issues I am going to have with Windows 11 and this particular article, indicating that they have been effectively leaving systems vulnerable simply because they have applications they don’t like installed is just not good enough. I’d understand it if they were saying “we can’t guarantee your OS stability with these apps” or “we can’t guarantee these apps will work anymore” if they were removing older API support, but this is ridiculous.

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      you should also have a look at alternatives as well.

      Especially if you do any kind of productivity work. Like video editing or photo editing. Photoshop and premiere are just absolute garbage, even if it requires you relearning an interface, not being pestered with creative cloud is a massive advantage.

      Oh and not having to pay for colors. That one is also pretty funny.

      • Australis13
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        Turns out one of the video-editing programs I use (VideoRedo) has shut down anyway (I think the owner passed away) and so I’ll need to look for an alternative anyway - I don’t think I can activate it on new machines anymore.

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          there are certainly a few options. I’ve been using flowblade as of late, seems to explode saving projects when you update to a new version, and use an old project, for some reason. Other than that it’s been perfectly fine.

          I hear people like kdenlive, idk, it seems alright. There’s also the free tier of davinci resolve. And im sure a few others.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    421 month ago

    Glad they have time to call out everyone else’s problems, yet Microsoft still can’t fix their broken jan win 10 update.

    • AlphaOmega
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 month ago

      Is that the one where MS updated the recovery partition by including a file that’s too big for that default partition? I had to manually resize my recovery partition to fix that issue

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yes. Normally, the OS “fixes” this by making a second, bigger recovery partition, but that only works if you have the space for it.

        • AlphaOmega
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          Well I guess 60 GB wasn’t enough space for the 10mb update

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            probably requires you to have un-allocated space on the drive, which is even funnier.

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 month ago

      don’t worry, microsoft never figured out how to write bootloader installation software.

      It can not only, install itself onto a slower, hdd, but also completely wipe any additional drives you have hooked up at the time of installation.

      The fact that this STILL isn’t fixed is baffling to me.

      • exu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Is this still an issue with UEFI nowadays? The other bootloader should still be selectable in the bootmenu if it wasn’t overwritten.

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          well you see that’s the problem, windows doesn’t believe in this cute little thing called following standard, so sometimes it just fucking yeets that shit, taking the bootloader with it, because keep in mind, when you dual boot on the same drive. You usually end up using grub to dualboot between linux and windows, which windows doesn’t like.

          And as for installs, some updates are basically installs, so who knows what the fuck kinda bullshit windows will be doing then. And like i said, if you ever do a clean install on a system with other disks, you better hope you get lucky.

  • @phoenixz
    link
    English
    401 month ago

    Install Linux and be done with this nonsense

  • My Password Is 1234
    link
    fedilink
    English
    351 month ago

    Imagine not being able to upgrade your Linux because you have modified YOUR system to suit YOUR needs. Fuck them…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 month ago

      I mean, if you’ve done something affecting upgrade paths - possible.

      Also I broke a FreeBSD ufs partition once while upgrading OpenBSD. I thought I’m very smart having that added into disklabel, and it would successfully mount read-only. Well, there were some actions to upgrade OpenBSD’s own ufs partitions, so - I don’t really remember whether I could restore any data, TBF. I think I could still mount that read-only from OpenBSD, but not from FreeBSD.

      But that’s about things being really broken.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        I broke Arch when they switched to Systemd (the process that launches all other processes), and that’s because I was an idiot and partially applied the fixes without rebooting, so things got borked. I could’ve fixed it, but reinstalling was faster (like 30 min, and I kept my files; fixing could’ve taken a couple hours).

        Other than that, I’ve had a couple drivers get misconfigured or something when upgrading Ubuntu or Fedora (I’ve had wifi and sound fixes not apply to an upgraded version), but I’ve never had an upgrade actually fail, and fixing it usually only took an hour or so to find someone online who has already provided the config options needed.

        So yeah, I’ve had nothing like this on Linux in the 15 or so years I’ve used it, everything so far has been fixable with relatively minimal effort. Then again, I don’t use any fancy licensed software, so I haven’t needed to pull an old version of something along across multiple releases (almost got a Scrivener license, which no longer supports Linux).

    • JohnEdwa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      But if those modifications were known to cause the system to brick after you update, wouldn’t it be really nice if it stopped you from doing it?
      And not just “yeah we know having done x will cause a bootloop after update, if you don’t know to uninstall/fix it it first, too bad.”

      • Rustmilian
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Linux devs would just make a patch to work with that configuration as it’d be considered a bug.

        • JohnEdwa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          How would that patch be distributed?

          Lets take VLC from this Windows example, the one that blocks windows updates is a really old version of it. If you have that, you need to either uninstall VLC or remove it to get Win 11 to update.

          If there was a bug where having a really old version of VLC on your system would somehow break if you updated the kernel, would a complicated workaround patch be integrated into the kernel just in case for forever?
          Or would the patch work exactly the same way as windows, where it would check for that version of VLC and tell you to remove or update it first?

          • Rustmilian
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 month ago

            I see you’re unaware of the number one rule of the Linux Kernel : DO NOT BREAK USER SPACE
            The patch would be distributed the exact same way that we distribute every single other patch in Linux.

            • JohnEdwa
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              the exact same way that we distribute every single other patch in Linux.

              Which is?

              I see you’re unaware of the number one rule of the Linux Kernel : DO NOT BREAK USER SPACE

              For sure, my linux experience is limited to playing around with raspis and the Steam Deck, and running apt-get update / upgrade and accepting everything at once. I haven’t actually even had a need to refuse updating something individually so I have no idea what the protocol is if I wouldn’t want to update some application. What I do know is that basically every single linux application has dependencies and if you don’t install, update or remove exactly what that application demands you to do, most of them refuse to install or update themselves - blocking updating because you have or don’t have something else on your system seems to be basically the norm with Linux.

              • Rustmilian
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Which is?

                Directly patching the code, then letting the distros do their thing.

                I have no idea what the protocol is if I wouldn’t want to update some application.

                You’d just put it in an exclude list in your specific package managers config file for example. The depends are forward compatible and will just keep updating as normal. Very very rarely is there ever a case where forward compatibility is broken, and if it ever is the devs did so for a very thought out reason.

                blocking updating because you have or don’t have something else on your system seems to be basically the norm with Linux.

                It is yes. Because if you don’t have a library an application depends on then it just won’t run.
                Except “have”, that’s not a real scenario; it’s always a matter of not having something; there’s packages that may conflict because they provide a different implementation of the same interface, but you’ll never be blocked by an application that depends on that interface.
                The dependencies are defined by the distro maintainers when they packaged the software.
                It ensures that package will function properly when installed.

                If you really really want a really really old version of something that depends on deprecated dependencies/libs, there’s always portable and universal package solutions that include those specific deps with it instead of relying on system libs.

              • KillingTimeItself
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                blocking updating because you have or don’t have something else on your system seems to be basically the norm with Linux.

                i mean yeah, when it does happen that’s the correct failstate. The difference here is that it’s trivial to troubleshoot and maintain. The chance that this happens is very low, unless somebody is rearranging packages in your repo. In which case that’s an easy enough fix, and usually already scripted for. Something to do with AUR, which doesn’t touch pacman. Or some hilariously convoluted piece of software kerfuckery.

                Usually, it’s handled remarkably gracefully.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Usually it’ll be available as a flatpak or something, which is a special container that can have outdated dependencies and whatnot without impacting the rest of the system.

            So if you really need some old version of VLC or something, just wrap it in a container and upgrade away! The upgrade would remove any incompatible apps (not containerized apps, just the system installed apps) and it would be on you to create or install that package if you haven’t already (almost everything old I’ve needed is already available).

            So go ahead and use the VLC initial release from 2001 or whatever, you might need to do some archeology to get the right versions of dependencies though.

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        idk maybe if you can detec the specific issue, you should maybe like, tell the user.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        That’s what I assumed but why would an is update break WO many things are they deprecating parts of the windows kernel?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That kind of attack is not possible with a signed kernel module/driver.

        How is using a compromised userspace library not possible with a signed kernel module?

        That aside, if the events would unfold similarly, the software requiring to be signed would be, in fact, signed.

        An awfully stupid comment TBF. As if you desperately tried to defend MS. EDIT: Sorry, that was just my irritation.

    • style99
      link
      fedilink
      171 month ago

      It was already bad enough that we’re stuck trying to use a trash OS to run our games and soul-sucking corporate crap, but now we have to ditch our customization tools to get updates that we need?

      Thank goodness I mostly just use Linux.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    What apps and links please? Just so I know what not to download.

    ::: (Yes I know its in the article…) :::

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 month ago
      ConisioAdmin.exe (Solidworks PDM)
      
      EaseUS Disk Copy.exe (EaseUS Disk Copy Application)
      
      ep_dwm.exe (ExplorerPatcher) Included since 22H2
      
      iCloudServices.exe (iCloud files shared in Explorer via WhatsApp) from 23H2
      
      RadeonSoftware.exe (AMD GPU perf settings) from23H2
      
      StartAllBackCfg.exe (StartAllBack) Included since 22H2
      
      Multi-mon + Copilot (Microsoft)
      
      MergeSdb (Microsoft)
      
      Intel IntcOED.sys (Intel)
      
      Intel IntcAudioBus.sys (Intel) (%WinDir%\System32\drivers\IntcAudioBus.sys)
      
      Realtek 8192su Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter (Realtek) (%WinDir%\System32\drivers\RTL8192su.sys)
      
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 month ago

        Huh, I didnt expect to see Intel or Realtek stuff in there.

        The iCloud one is funny and oddly specific. Its like a “fuck you for using both Apple and Facebook crap”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 month ago

      It looks like they break Microsoft’s update mechanism somehow, and Microsoft won’t work around it. If it’s because they’d have to make special cases just for one app I get it, but it doesn’t seem like that’s what’s happening.

      • Rustmilian
        link
        fedilink
        English
        431 month ago

        they break Microsoft’s update mechanism somehow

        Microsoft’s update mechanism breaks Microsoft’s update mechanism.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 month ago

          There were so many times that updating Win7 was a nightmare. I used to do plenty of fresh installs on various PCs and I would have to wait a day or sometimes more to get the OS up to date. I would have thought we moved past this by now.

          • Rustmilian
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Definitely not. Sometimes you even have to install additional bloatware like “HP support assistant” for example to complete the update process because the built-in update system is dysfunctional af.

            • ditty
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              Yup or Dell SupportAssist, or Lenovo System Update, etc

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 month ago

          Microsoft’s update mechanism is just fucking awful trash, they should replace it with downloading an archive and unpacking it.

          They seem to think they are very smart with all those binary deltas, but it appears to be so complex that nobody inside that company understands it fully, and that’s for more than 10 years.

          Apparently people responsible for creating it still work there in important places, can’t find another explanation.

      • no banana
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        Hmm… I’ll have to look for these applications. Some of them seem ubiquitous.

      • Superb
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        Large companies do not shy away from making workaround for specific apps. Every large platform that I know of has some form of app specific workarounds to fix problems with popular apps. Graphics drivers, browsers, iOS, Android. I haven’t heard any stories about windows but given their commitment to backwards compatibility, they must have

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 month ago

      DeskModder noted that it wasn’t as simple as blocking an app based entirely on its name; for example, while VLC is listed in the big list of services and apps that are disallowed, it’s specifically listing a Windows 7 version of VLC.

      Sounds like Windows has a problem with really old versions only. I guess you should be fine as long as you keep your apps relatively fresh.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        People don’t read articles and you are asking them to keep their apps fresh? Just let them fuck themselves

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Rule 1 in Reddit: never read the article

          Rule 2: react to the headline

          Since we’re on Lemmy, I thought I might get away with breaking the rules.