The standards on residential water heater efficiency, which are required by Congress, have not been updated in 13 years. Water heating is responsible for roughly 13% of both annual residential energy use and consumer utility costs, the DOE said.

  • pottedmeat7910@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does this mean we’re about to see Republicans start to use “DEMONRATS WANT TO TAKE AWAY YOUR HIT WATER” as a talking point soon?

    • p0ppe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How will Trump was his beautiful hair, if the democrats take away his water heater?

  • someguy3
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The proposal would require the most common-sized electric water heaters to achieve efficiency gains with heat pump technology and gas-fired water heaters to achieve efficiency gains through condensing technology.

    The electric one is a pretty big design change.

    Interesting what industry says on it:

    A group including water heater maker Rheem, environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council and efficiency and consumer advocacy organizations issued a joint statement welcoming the new standards.

    Tankless water heater maker Rinnai (5947.T), however, said the proposed standards for its products were “technologically impossible” and would reduce consumer choice.

    PS if you want to reduce your hot water usage, turn off the shower while you’re soaping. I’ve got my shower down to like 1 minute of running water. Wash clothes on cold.

    • kitonthenet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tankless water heater maker Rinnai

      were “technologically impossible”

      impossible for a tankless heater maybe, but Jesus the amount of power those things draw

      • tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When it’s on. When you aren’t using it, it draws zero. I’ve had a tankless electric for 8 years, and my power usage hasn’t changed much either up or down.

          • tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I doubt the energy savings would cover the cost difference in my case, and even if it did it’s worth a little extra to never run out of hot water.

            I’ll stick with the tankless.

            • kitonthenet@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              its somewhere like 3x more efficient, and for environmental standards, I’m sorry but your personal preference shouldn’t really matter. 3x is 3x

              • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Storage water heaters can also capture off peak or curtailed energy (acting as 6-12kWh of diurnal storage), so they are more than 3x better in terms of emissions.

    • FishInABarrel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Heat pump water heaters already exist, but I think they’re pretty expensive compared to gas/resistive heat.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if electric tankless water heaters are indeed infeasible under this mandate. Heat pumps generally aren’t powerful, and tankless heaters require enormous amounts of power while in use.

      • Martin@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Heat pump water heaters are pretty standard in large parts of the world. They are a bit expensive to install, but with today’s electric prices, they pay off quite fast.

      • someguy3
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It may exist but to require it is a whole different ball game.

      • someguy3
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depends on the temp, I mean to measure it but around here I think it’s close to 0 C.

    • someguy3
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Surely the free market solves everything!

  • solidsnake2085@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a plumber in Denver and we are already dealing with the natural gas ban in the city limits. If someone’s gas water heater goes out it’s possible we have to wait up to two weeks to install one. This is after we have to give a detailed explanation as to why we can’t just upgrade to an electric one. If they deny the gas water heater and make us put in an electric one the cost for the homeowner is way more expensive. It’ll be interesting to see how this will all play out.

  • weariedfae@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d like to think this will be a good thing but then it could go the way of the toilet episode of King of the Hill.