• jadero
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Maybe it’s because all the younger generations really are smarter than mine (boomer). For most of my 50 years in the workforce, I was told:

    • I was lucky to have a job (justification for low wages, small raises, and no raises)
    • I had to go along to get along (justification for shitty working conditions, some of which contravened labour law and safety regulations)
    • I had to work hard to get ahead (justification for perpetual short staffing, stupid shifts, and excessive overtime)
    • I had to prove myself to get promotions (actually do the work of the next level up without the next level pay)
    • Training and certifications were for my benefit or just the cost of getting in the door (justification for the gutting and even elimination of on-the-job and employer-sponsored training as well as not having higher pay to go with more training and education)

    For most of my working life, I took my father’s advice to demand both my legal rights and my human dignity at great cost to my employment success. The 15 years I tried it “the right way” just left me exploited and burned out.

    If falling productivity is a result of people finally demanding that laws and human dignity be not just respected but honoured and advanced, then I say let it fall.

    I’ve heard people say that maybe it’s time to reset productivity expectations or even redefine what is meant by productivity.

    I think they make good cases for those things, but maybe it’s time for, I don’t know, something so radical as to be unthinkable. Like maybe it’s time for the business community to look inward for the problem.

    • yeehaw
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      All your points I lost belief in early in my career. I’ve got no certs, just a little bit of college education. I think I’m considered a millennial. So far, I’ve been right. I have 2 jobs, one of them I make >130k a year and the other >40k. I’m not working that hard, if I’m being completely honest. I also have a lot of costs and it’s still only enough to live pay cheque to pay cheque.

      • jadero
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        170k and still living paycheque to paycheque? That truly sucks. Honestly, I can’t even imagine it. My heart goes out to you.

        We live in rural Saskatchewan in a self-renovated 1968 mobile home on a leased lot. That is the single best decision we’ve ever made. If we had stayed in Saskatoon, we’d be either still be working, maybe full-time, or destitute. As it is, our annual rent and taxes is about the same as the monthly rent is in our old apartment. Some careful budgeting, a garden, and plenty of fish from the nearby lake means that we actually have a pretty decent lifestyle on <40k (combined income).

        • yeehaw
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s impressive for less than 40k. I’m definitely in a more expensive area and have a mortgage and several dependants so all that’s working against me too. Got lucky with the housing situation though and my mortgage is actually quite small, by a lot, compared to anyone else where I’m at.