• SurfinBird
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    Please don’t tell their origin story again. There have already been enough fantastic 4 flops.

    • ryan213
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      But it’ll be this director’s version. Lol

  • MrNesser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Ah yes the annual minimum effort F4 movie just so they can keep the licence away from Marvel

    • ZeroCool@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ah yes the annual minimum effort F4 movie just so they can keep the licence away from Marvel

      Nope. Disney bought 21st Century Fox five years ago. This is an MCU movie.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Jfc, they’re going to fuck this one up too.

    Not because of her, that’s fine. It’s that out of all the possibilities they have, they’re going with one of the two most obvious picks, and that’s a bad sign for them just letting the FF stand as the cultural entity that they are.

    A new movie with any version of Doom, or the surfer is going to be a flop because it has already been done. You can’t disconnect the previous movies, especially not by essentially just using an alt version of a character.

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Julia Garner is a porcelain doll, enchanted by a witch or warlock, capable of autonomous movement and human behavior.

    This isn’t a conspiracy theory, it’s a fact. And only I am capable of teaching her how to love.

  • Tolstoshev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m just annoyed that they are wasting Julia Garner when she could be spending that time acting in a better movie.

  • Auli
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    So there just sealing her and the surfer? Instead of him making the deal she does? Why?

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I want this to do well just for her, she is brilliant to watch just hope she the right roles moving forward.

  • Crismus@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    So they’re intent on pushing forward with the doomed version of the Ultimate Universe, where Reed becomes a psycho dictator and wants to control the world and the invisible Woman falls in love with Ben who loses his rock shell but keeps his strength.

    The Silver Surfer is a sexy robot chick and Perter Parker is killed off for Miles Morales to take over.

    I’m glad I gave up on the MCU after Endgame. Since nothing makes sense anymore and I’m not giving Disney money to watch their bloated overbudget shows.

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      I really dislike the people who unironically scream “woke” at everything, but what exactly is the point of turning characters into women? You know they are not doing it to empower women, they do it to squeeze more money out of a franchise, you know to gater female silver surfer fans? But it doesn’t even seem to work. Why is no one turning female characters into males? Wouldn’t that be “woke” too? There will never be a male xena warrior prince, and as a dude… That’s fine. I watched xena as a kid and i never wished she was a guy so i can indentify with her.