• Comrade GitGud@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    Does the US not permit Write-In candidates or third parties? Crazy, I could have sworn they did. A miniscule, even infinitesimal chance of winning by voting for a not evil candidate sounds more morally palatable to me than voting for a war criminal. You do you though, I’m quite certain your conscience can handle it.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      yes and no. depends on the state, but reality dictates in our current system and with the current candidates every vote for 3rd party will be a tacit vote for trump.

      dont vote? thats a vote for trump. vote for a 3rd party? thats a vote for trump.

      until we have an actual system that supports 3rd parties we have no choice. because the vote for trump/republicans leads to a system with less parties than 2, not more.

      my conscience says i want more parties. my conscience says ‘vote less evil not more’.

      • Comrade GitGud@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Amazing! All those votes that came in for Trump and they could have just voted 3rd party instead to get the same result! Why does anyone even bother voting for Trump? They could just vote for the person with the shortest name that isn’t Biden!

      • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        no they are not “votes for trump” are they votes biden is not getting yes, however the only way they are “Votes for trump” is if you are starting with the assumption that Biden either already has or inharently deserves the votes. He does not, he does not have my vote and not giving it to him is taking a vote from him. he has to earn it, and he has not

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Actually if the US became a single party state for a term because there is no difference between the established parties, assuming first past the post is still in place, a 2nd party would be forced into electoral relevancy, so that would actually be the preferred outcome of not voting for the current two parties.