In 2004, Donald Davis and fellow scientists at the University of Texas made an alarming discovery: 43 foods, mostly vegetables, showed a marked decrease in nutrients between the mid and late 20th century.

According to that research, the calcium in green beans dropped from 65 to 37mg. Vitamin A levels plummeted by almost half in asparagus. Broccoli stalks had less iron.

Nutrient loss has continued since that study. More recent research has documented the declining nutrient value in some staple crops due to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels; a 2018 study that tested rice found that higher CO2 levels reduced its protein, iron and zinc content.

While the climate crisis has only accelerated concerns about crops’ nutritional value, prompting the emergence of a process called biofortification as a strategy to replenish lost nutrients or those that foods never had in the first place.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    8 months ago

    Interesting idea.

    I submit another idea: that food grown is being harvested earlier for quick turnaround and, for example the fruiting parts, immature in comparison from years ago.

    If the plant ramps up nutrient storage as seeds mature, early harvesting is counterproductive.

    I’d love to test that idea!

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      8 months ago

      I suspect one would find both contribute, and also possibly soil depletion.

      All I really know is that heirlooms taste better and are far more satisfying. But even just burpee seed tomatoes, letting them ripen on a still-live vine is insanely more flavorful than picking them green and letting them ripen in transit.

      Or like with apples- they’re harvested in the fall, and stored just above freezing.

      Ultimately the cause is commercialization, if there’s More ways it happens.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t know about tomatoes, but with stawberries, that’s just water. You sell strawberries by mass, so in the store, we have very large ones with a lot of water.

        I’ve had wild strawberries a few times. They have a much stronger flavor, but they’re also tiny compared to commercial ones.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          Growing the same basic varieties, it’s definitely within the same mass range you’d expect. Keep in mind it’s not just absorbing water, when it ripens on a still-in-the-ground vine, it’s also absorbing nutrients etc.

          Commercially grown tomatoes are cut off from that and left to ripper on their own. The flavor is almost entirely different. Keep in mind that commercial varieties aren’t any where close to ready when they’re picked. (This includes the “vine on” things they like to sell now too.)

          A tomato is “good enough” when it’s yellow, picking them can keep the plant producing well into fall.

          I’ve had plants that have gone the better part of seasons before it got… unwieldy in the aero racks, but I’m forcing year round in a greenhouse.

          they’ll still be amazing, but not quite as amazing if you let it come off after a gentle twist. Also, if you’re normal and growing outside, rain can cause splitting, so it’s best to pull it in early if that’s expected.

          Just some learned advice… resist the temptation do blackberries or raspberries inside a greenhouse…. Yeah. That’s a war….