Luis Rubiales could face a prison sentence of two and a half years if convicted of kissing Jenni Hermoso on the lips against her will, court documents have shown. The former Spanish football federation chief has been charged with one count of sexual assault and one of coercion in the aftermath of the kiss, offences carrying jail terms of one year and 18 months respectively.

The 46-year-old grabbed ­Hermoso and kissed her on the lips on 20 August during the awards ceremony after Spain beat England in the Women’s World Cup final in Sydney, sparking global outrage and ­causing a national debate in Spain about ­sexism. ­Hermoso and her teammates said the kiss was unwanted and demeaning, but Rubiales argued it was consensual and denied any wrongdoing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    74
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    30 months?

    For a kiss?

    You’re goddamned right.

    Keep it to yourself, fucking creep.

    Edit: Everyone move to the sidewalks, the anti-woke parade is marching through with their cute little batons and hats and the giant balloon mascots of their precious egos.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -33
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I don’t know about that. Seems grossly disproportionate, some sort of professional disciplinary action would be more appropriate. Perhaps a fine he’d notice paying. It doesn’t seem like a sexual thing, just an excitement thing, I really don’t know whether you can pin in on sexism. Like, would I kiss a guy out of joy? Potentially yes, in this context, if I knew them well. Was it stupid? Also yes. If he squeezed her arse at the same time, I feel that would then be assault. But maybe not if you were to squeeze a guy’s arse in the same context? Also, if they were Italian I wonder if we’d be having this discussion.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s not the physical moves at all in this judgement. He threatened her to say it was consensual afterward, that is the most damning thing about this incident.

        And then he wanted to remain in charge even after the team said they wouldn’t play with him there. The last thing is not a crime, however it does show how power hungry and short sighted the guy is.

        Had he just made an apology instead of a threat this whole thing would be very different.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That was a bad course of action, I agree. You’d certainly expect him to lose his job.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Assault itself is illegal, then pressuring someone to cover it up is more so. Has he handeled it better he might have kept his job. But he chose to be an unsufferable twat about it and they threw the book at him.

            If you run a red light and get caught you might get off with a warning, if you’re polite about it. If curse at the cop and then try to bribe him, you’re probably going to jail.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 month ago

        So, it’s Ok for a man to kiss a woman without consent as long as they are celebrating something? I just want to make sure I’ve got your permission to start snogging marathon runners. Or should I go to an Italian marathon, since nationality seems to play a role in consent in your mind.

          • livus
            link
            fedilink
            341 month ago

            Headline is a bit clickbaity, 30 months is the maximum penalty for sexual assault plus the max penalty for coercion, if he got both maximums and had to serve consecutively not concurrently.

            There will likely be sentencing guidelines though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 month ago

            Well, then, by all means, put a figure on it. Remember, justice should be blind, so “disciplinary action” doesn’t really cut it on the civil side of things. What is a valid punishment for nonconsensual sexual contact in a court of law? What should any member of society receive if they were to do this?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              8
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              If a boss forced an unwanted kiss (and bear hug lift) on an employee, and then insisted that it was consensual and that the employee was lying when they said it was not, tried to coerce them into saying they were lying, had other senior people declare that they were lying, and used the company website to declare that they were lying, after a years-long dispute with this and dozens of other employees complaining of sexism and creepy behaviour endorsed by this boss…

              I’m not a fan of carceral solutions but I’d certainly like to see a lifetime ban on working in that industry, a lifetime ban on holding any position of authority over others without supervision, and massive monetary compensation to every complainant.

              And if the criminal justice system in its current carceral context magically became laser-focused on rich people abusing their power instead of poor people trying to survive, that would be an excellent start, no?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Whew. You sure you want to argue that child molester punishments should set the bar on sexual assault criminal punishment? Cause I’d be OK with stringing up pedophiles by their ball sacks and letting fire ants eat them from the asshole out. But I digress.

                What you are saying is that if you were out at a bar, and someone, anyone really, but lets say for the sake of argument it’s Harvey Weinstein, came up and kissed your partner on the mouth without their consent, a month is fine? What if he kissed your daughter? Just grabbed either of them by the ears and planted a slobbery mouthful of sexual assault on them. A month is good? He could walk free? How do you think your partner would feel? How about your daughter? What if it was televised? What if it became their life for the next year in a very public court case? A month? Just let me know when you are out and about with someone you care about. I’ve got a few weeks of vacation saved up, I can take the hit and spend some time in the clink.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  101 month ago

                  So you’re saying if a female coworker that had a bit too much to drink at the office new year party gives me an uninvited hug and kiss, I can sure her and she gets 30 months in jail?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -81 month ago

          What he’s saying is that if it was a mistake, a moment of excitement, it’s forgivable if she wants it to be.

          I think they’re also suggesting is that the “professionally outraged” people on the internet, such as yourself, were more offended by this than she was

          • VaultBoyNewVegas
            link
            fedilink
            English
            191 month ago

            Yeah, she really wasn’t bothered when she had the Spanish football authorities and her coach in her words “harassing” her to drop it. I’m sure she was just fine with it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 month ago

            You should be a lawyer. That’s a hell of an argument. I bet if you read a statement by her about the issue, or researched the court case at all, all of the things you just said would stand up.

            No, wait, they wouldn’t.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        30 months is disproportionate for sexually harassing/assaulting an employee? Get the fuck out of here with that shit.

        And yes, that’s what that was. An unsolicited kiss is absolutely sexual harassment and/or assault. Doubly so from a person I’m a position of authority.

      • bushparty
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Wow. You’ve been working out your mental gymnastics muscles a lot lately, I bet! This is an impressive lack of logic. Congratulations, you didn’t contribute anything and are excusing sexism and sexual assault. You sound fun.

  • Track_Shovel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 month ago

    It was only a kiss, it was only a kiss…

    Now I’m falling asleep And she’s calling a cab While he’s having a smoke And she’s taking a drag

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Now they’re going to bed

      And my stomach is sick

      and it’s all in my head

      but they’re getting their cuffs now

      I think my luck has run out.

      Let me goooo

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 month ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Luis Rubiales could face a prison sentence of two and a half years if convicted of kissing Jenni Hermoso on the lips against her will, court documents have shown.

    The former Spanish football federation chief has been charged with one count of sexual assault and one of coercion in the aftermath of the kiss, offences carrying jail terms of one year and 18 months respectively.

    The indictment said the three officials harassed Hermoso by exerting “constant and repeated acts of pressure” directly on the player and through her friends and family.

    Spain’s criminal code allows judges to “exceptionally” suspend jail terms if – as in this case – none of the sentences imposed individually exceeds two years.

    Police were also reported to have raided an apartment in Granada belonging to Rubiales, who was banned from all football activity for three years in October over his misconduct at the World Cup final.

    The RFEF issued a statement on Wednesday confirming its management commission will now ­examine “any type of contract that may be under suspicion due to the actions of its former president, Luis Rubiales.


    The original article contains 519 words, the summary contains 184 words. Saved 65%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 month ago

      So they want to get him off the street as the violent sexual predator criminal he is?

      FTFY. The answer is yes BTW.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -241 month ago

        For a kiss? Ok, sure.

        Thought you people hated the policestate but whatever… a fine, sure, but prison! This clown world man…

        • Bonehead
          link
          fedilink
          301 month ago

          For the unwanted sexual assault, and the concerted effort to dismiss and reframe the event afterwards that was designed to silence her while never taking responsibility for anything.

          Like seriously, the charges are in the article. And here you are, trying to dismiss and reframe the event afterwards…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -161 month ago

            The 46-year-old grabbed ­Hermoso and kissed her on the lips on 20 August during the awards ceremony

            If that’s sexual assault, that also should be punished with jail, remains for the court to decide. Not for you, though, since you have no authority at all.

            And I think this whole thing is fucking ridiculous

            • Bonehead
              link
              fedilink
              181 month ago

              If that’s sexual assault, that also should be punished with jail, remains for the court to decide.

              It was sexual assault, and the punishment was jail as decided by a judge. But here you are, arguing against it despite having no authority at all…

                • Bonehead
                  link
                  fedilink
                  8
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  The conviction still has to be decided, yet the action has been judged to be sexual assault which is what brought the charges in the first place, and the judge had already decided the jail time involved. Try to keep up.

            • @dubyakay
              link
              English
              12
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Did you even bother reading further or does your brain only have capacity for that single sentence?

              Edit: I’m feeling generous so I’ll help you:

              The former Spanish football federation chief has been charged with one count of sexual assault and one of coercion in the aftermath of the kiss, offences carrying jail terms of one year and 18 months respectively.

              Hermoso and her teammates said the kiss was unwanted and demeaning, but Rubiales argued it was consensual and denied any wrongdoing.

              I’ll break this down for you. Two scenarios.

              Scenario#1 (where it could have gone):

              • Rubiales kisses Hermoso (does not look consensual)
              • Rubiales profusely apologizes in the aftermath and shows genuine remorse for his actions without spewing shit
              • He gets a fine and a slap on the wrist

              Scenario#2 (where it went):

              • Rubiales kisses Hermoso (does not look consensual)
              • Hermoso says it was unwanted
              • Rubiales contradicts
              • Rubiales doubles down, gaslights
              • His team wants him to step down
              • Rubiales throws a tantrum

              Admitting when you are wrong or did something wrong is manly. Rubiales is a powerhungry psychopath.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              81 month ago

              So you would be cool if some dude grabbed you and kissed you in the lips against your will?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 month ago

                I’ve spent a lot of time in West Hollywood with my gay friends. I’ve had that exact thing happen. Was I cool with it? Not exactly, but I also understand it’s different for women vs men because of both the power difference and the consistency. Do I think it warranted 30 months in jail? Jesus fuck, no. Do I think it deserved 1 month in jail? Again, no. A night in jail to think about what you’ve done plus a public apology so other men start seeing that it’s not OK? That’s starting to sound right.

                Again, I understand it is different when this happens to women vs men, but I’ve had women in clothing stores walk by and grab my ass. That’s much worse than this case, but I don’t think that deserves a month in jail, let alone 30.

                Now, the part where he tried to coerce her into saying it was welcomed and she was fine with it, that’s where the real punishment should come from.

                • livus
                  link
                  fedilink
                  41 month ago

                  @dogslayeggs

                  Now, the part where he tried to coerce her into saying it was welcomed and she was fine with it, that’s where the real punishment should come from.

                  According to the article the potential maximum punishment for coercion is one and a half times the potential maximum punishment for sexual assault.

                  They arrived at the 30 month figure by adding the two together. Given that ratio and the circumstances, I think it’s likely that the bulk of whatever sentence he does receive will be drawn from the coercion charge.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  6
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  So what do you mean by?

                  I think this whole thing is fucking ridiculous

                  It seems you are uninterested in any kind of justice for the victim.

        • athos77
          link
          fedilink
          101 month ago

          No, not for “a kiss”, for sexual assault and coercion just like it says in the article.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 month ago

          I hate the police state. Those people over there hate whatever made them mad in middle school.

        • roastedDeflator
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Of course not. This is why Murvel’s question seemed so weird that I thought of asking.

          • NoIWontPickAName
            link
            fedilink
            41 month ago

            Oh, I thought we were doing a bit.

            Like I agree with you, just thought we were going for dark humor

            • roastedDeflator
              link
              fedilink
              31 month ago

              It looks like we had different visibility of the fediverse, I am in kbin. It seemed like you asked me. Murvel’s comment just arrived. It still looks like you ask me.