• owen
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    Critics are calling it the Aquatic 9/11!

        • palebluethought@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I mean I can’t speak to how “flimsy” this particular bridge is, but it was hit by a container ship. Those things weigh in the hundreds of thousands of tons. It doesn’t much matter how sturdy your bridge is, it’s going down.

          • Visstix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Then that bridge needed to be reinforced a long time ago, or ships like that shouldn’t be allowed there. This was a flimsy bridge for what it is dealing with.

            • palebluethought@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Again, getting hit head on by a cargo ship, you may as well be throwing the empire State building at it. There is not a bridge on earth that would survive that collision.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The bridge got hit by what is effectively a floating skyscraper

      • owen
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        No, but it’s a big head on static structure collision