- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
Seems like a good start, but I wonder why it doesn’t include judicial.
Don’t worry it has 0 chance of passing.
It could, because the requirements will be laughable. This is just a way for them to obfuscate their investment via a third party while virtue signaling.
It’s also a way for them to finger point during election season.
Finger pointing! That is definitely something a politician excels at.
“They aren’t my stocks, they’re my wife’s/husband’s/daughter’s/son’s” - every politician
“my wealth manager does all that stuff, sure we have a weekly golf game together, but that doesn’t affect the trades he makes”
Something like this requires a constitution amendment…
