Characterized by vast expanses of dunes and sparsely vegetated plains, Western Sahara is a predominantly desert and arid territory. The United Nations categorizes

it as a non-self-governing territory, essentially a remnant of a former colony.

But underneath its soil lies abundant reserves of phosphate — a vital component in fertilizer production, which became a strategically important commodity following the war in Ukraine. The territory also has rich fishing waters along its coastline on the Atlantic Ocean.

Morocco considers Western Sahara an integral part of its territory and has maintained de facto control over most of the region for decades. However, most countries — and the United Nations — have refused to endorse Morocco’s claim.

Along with the UN General Assembly, several international courts including the International Court of Justice

have ruled that colonialization in Western Sahara is still pending and Morocco’s efforts to annex it are illegal.

On Monday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu officially recognized Morocco’s sovereignty over Western Sahara, making Israel the second country (after the United States under the Trump administration) to back Rabat’s claims.

Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen on Monday welcomed the move, saying in a statement that it would "strengthen the relations between the countries and between the nations, as well as the continuation of cooperation to deepen peace and regional stability.”

However, there are concerns that the situation in Western Sahara is in fact moving away from “peace and stability,” and that the territories might once again become scenes of armed conflict between the Moroccan military, the pro-independence Polisario Front, and neighboring Algeria. How did the Western Sahara conflict begin?

The Western Sahara dispute began in 1975 when Spain, which had been a colonial power, withdrew from the territories and left their future uncertain. In the aftermath of Spain’s departure, Morocco organized the “Green March,” where thousands of Moroccan civilians entered Western Sahara and asserted Moroccan sovereignty. The move faced resistance from the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) and its military wing, the Polisario Front, which claimed they were the representatives of the indigenous Sahrawi people and sought full independence.

Armed conflict broke out between Morocco and Polisario Front the same year, which continued until the United Nations brokered a fragile ceasefire.

The UN has supported a referendum on self-determination, which has yet to take place due to disputes over issues such as who would be eligible to vote in such a referendum.

The conflict broke out again in November 2020 when Morocco deployed its military to quell a Sahrawi protest. In response, the Polisario Front declared the existing ceasefire annulled.

“In terms of the human rights situation, Western Sahara is a black hole,” Meriem Naili, an international law researcher from the University of Exeter, told DW. “We know that atrocities frequently occur there, but the government in Morocco does not allow officials from the UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights to visit the occupied lands,” she added. “A colonial fishing deal”

Israel’s recognition came a day before the end of a decades-long fishery deal between Morocco and the European Union, as the bloc struggles to reconcile its economic interests and following international law.

In 2021, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) delivered a ruling that rendered the EU-Morocco fishing protocol null and void. Currently, the bloc has opted to await the ECJ’s response to Morocco’s appeal before deciding on whether to extend the protocol.

“It is a historic win for the Sahrawis,” said Erik Hagen, a board member of Western Sahara Resource Watch (WSRW).

He traced the protocol back to a deal made between Morocco and colonial Spain, in which the Spanish agreed to withdraw from the region in exchange for gaining fishing rights from Morocco. “After joining the European Union in 1986, Spain brought this colonial legacy into the EU framework,” he pointed out.

The controversial fishing pact is only one of the manifestations of the EU countries’ dilemma with Morocco, according to Hagen.

The bloc’s officials do not recognize Morocco’s sovereignty claims over Western Sahara and follow the UN in regarding it as a militarily occupied land. However, EU member states, including France, Spain, and Germany, support Morocco in granting autonomy to Western Sahara .

Morocco is an important partner for most EU countries, which makes it tricky for the EU to push back against Morocco’s position on Western Sahara: The EU has several agreements with the kingdom, including on migration, trade, and renewable energy.

“Morocco knows how to play these cards,” Hagen said. “As long as matters such as migration remain high on countries’ national agenda, the EU member states would find it hard to make moves that anger Morocco.” The rivalry between Algeria and Morocco

The Trump administration’s recognition of Rabat’s claims over Western Sahara in 2020 was part of the Abraham Accord, a project aimed at bringing Israel and Arab countries together through a series of trade deals. The relations between Rabat and Tel Aviv continued to improve, with Morocco purchasing an increased sum of military equipment from both the United States and Israel.

Morocco’s neighbor, Algeria, which also shares a border with Western Sahara, went the opposite way and sought to tighten its military ties with Russia. Algeria severed diplomatic relations with Morocco in 2021. “The tensions between Morocco and Algeria have been simmering for years now, and it has always had a direct impact on Western Sahara,” said Naili.

The rivalry between Morocco and Algeria dates back to their independence, with tensions leading to clashes in Western Sahara at times. For decades, Algeria provided military support to the Polisario Front and allowed its leaders, as well as many Sahrawi refugees, to establish camps within its borders.

Both countries have ramped up their military spending in the past decade, according to the database of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Last year, Morocco added a military sector along its borders with Algeria.

“The recognition and even supporting autonomy plan is unlikely to help with the peace process, because it antagonizes one of the conflict’s parties,” Naili said.

“Nothing short of a referendum can solve this dispute,” she added. “No deal between the EU, Morocco, and even Polisario can determine the fate of the Sahrawi people. Sahrawis’ autonomy is not theirs to give and international courts have made it clear.”

  • Troy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is quite a nice article. Feels like an history paper, but written about the present. Interesting power vacuum there, with a bunch of parties trying to fill it.

  • danhasnolife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Great article. If Morocco’s claim is rejected, what’s stopping Algeria from trying to step into that power vacuum? Does Western Sahara have any sort of organized military that could resist against armed conflict over its resources?

    I wouldn’t be surprised if we just saw the region become a capitalism pseudo-country, with US/China coming in to buy off the resources.

  • GataZapata@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hahaha new

    This was going on when Morocco was still francos colony. This was going under the last king of Morocco. Current king has been having his go at repressive violence in that zone for at least 10 - 15 years now. Please

    “We know that atrocities frequently occur there, but the government in Morocco does not allow officials from the UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights to visit the occupied lands,”

    I am getting sick and tired and disgusted by the so called human rights oriented west conveniently forgetting about these rights as soon as any international economic pressure is put up. This is a shame, and fuck us for buying their fish and financing arms.

    Fuck us or accepting the treatment of these people, of the Palestineans, of the refugees we kick back into the ocean, of the kashmir and other Indian minorities because we need a ‘strong partner against china’, fuck us for buying Chinese shit when we know about uyghurs, fuck us for Guantanamo bay and the Iraq war and sooo much more

    Fuck anyone who uses people as a bartering chip and fuck them double if then they have the audacity to turn around and claim it is for the greater good or that they still have morals or care about human rights. Fuck us, we are so self righteous, and this is so tiring