Donald Trump’s second White House chief of staff tried to stop him praising Adolf Hitler in part by trying to convince the then president Benito Mussolini, the Italian fascist dictator, was “a great guy in comparison”.

  • the_frumious_bandersnatch@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    9 months ago

    At this point we’ve reached a complete and utter death of euphemism around anything regarding Trump.

    All attempts to “bring to light” any horrible thing Trump has factually committed will be met by his followers with, “Well that’s actually a good thing.” And any politician trying to ride his wake will have to go along with it.

    How soon until we start hearing “Look, we have to view Hitler with some nuance” from the Senate podium.

    • modifier
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      How soon until we start hearing “Look, we have to view Hitler with some nuance” from the Senate podium.

      The very fact that this is a serious question, that this even could be a serious question, is downright chilling.

      Though it will likely show up in the House first, I fear the answer to your question is “not long”.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        There should be some nuance.

        We need to recognize that Hitler did at least one good thing.

        (He offed himself.)

        In a more serious vein, we need to recognize how easy it is to fall in with… that. Hitler was unspeakably evil. But he had a lot of people following him, some of whom are no more evil than anyone else.

        the only way to prevent another version of him, is to recognize there is a risk we, personally, could fall for it. And to be perfectly blunt, republicans have.

        Said another way, there is a capacity for evil in everyone; even as there is a capacity for good. Evil people don’t know that they’re evil- they can’t even consider the possibility, because they refuse to accept this.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Okay, at least include the in comparison part, guardian, this title is clickbaity crap

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    “I know you love arsenic, but have you tried cyanide?”

    – this guy

  • 520@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    I mean it’s easy to be a great guy in comparison when you lower the bar to the depths of hell.

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          All of his blood really did brighten up that piazza! I believe his lower intestine added a lot of character to a nearby frieze depicting Caesar crossing the Rubicon. I wonder if he would have appreciated the irony…

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah this is one of those rare cases where “Mussolini was a great guy in comparison” is actually an accurate statement

  • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I wonder how many people in America agree with him about Hitler. No, actually I don’t think I want to know.