U.S. Rep. Katie Porter became a social media celebrity by brandishing a white board at congressional hearings to dissect CEOs and break down complex figures into assaults on corporate greed, a signature image that propelled the Democrat’s U.S. Senate candidacy in California.

The progressive favorite known for spotlighting her soccer mom, minivan-driving home life was trounced in Tuesday’s primary election to fill the seat once held by the late Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, finishing far behind Republican Steve Garvey and fellow Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff.

Porter didn’t go down quietly. She immediately pointed a finger at “billionaires spending millions to rig this election.” That claim resulted in a brutal social media backlash from many who were happy to depict the congresswoman as a graceless loser.

Perhaps chastened by the criticism, Porter later clarified her initial statement to say she didn’t believe the California vote count or election process had been compromised, but she didn’t recant her earlier remarks. Rigged, she said in a follow-up, “means manipulated by dishonest means.”

  • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    Turning out a bunch of Democrats to vote would have helped down ballot too.

    • girlfreddyOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      She was up against BIG pac money and couldn’t battle that demon (literally).

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m referring to a D vs. D general election having benefits on D vs. R downballot races. Big PAC money didn’t want to risk someone winning who would threaten their personal finances if the only cost was potentially electing more Republicans.