• jabjoe@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yes, which is why we have anticompetition laws. It’s just for some reason, people can’t always see competition problem when it’s technology.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Tech looks like magic to the average person. It’s even hard for tech people to definitively tell if something inappropriate is happening, unless they have access to the source. And even so, companies will hide behind the ‘trade secrets’ excuse. Most of the time we can only imagine the shenanigans happening behind the veneer of the corporate copy, because it’s what we would do, given the vast amounts of data and lack of accountability/ transparency available for exploitation.

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        All true, but they are also failing at simple stuff. Requiring a closed company’s format or services is a monopoly. Especially if “everyone else is doing it”. That is when regulators need to step in as it’s a market failure when there is a single vendor “everyone is using”.

        • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Correct. I feel the regulators lost the plot when they didn’t keep up with market demands for next gen messaging, leading first to the proprietary protocols and then the proliferation of third party apps growing out of a person’s social clout. It’s sucks having to check which app someone is on before I can communicate with them. Some of us here in Asia have 10+ messaging apps on our phone, a combination of pre installed bloatware and apps installed because someone else didn’t have my one, esoteric app. Each time we are handing over more and more of our personal data, network, metadata (so they say) etc.

          • jabjoe@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It was a problem before IMs on phones. Or smart phone. (Maybe not IMs because of IRC). Microsoft have been conflating monopolies with standards since forever. Not only dominating desktop operating systems, but office software on it. Using monopoly of one to get a monopoly of the other. And lets not forget what they did with browers. The EU is only body in the world dealing with the problem at all.

            Phones in Asia sound even more dystopian than here in the UK. Surely you can still go LineageOS, GrapheneOS, etc?