• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    We aren’t going to engage in a military operation AGAINST Israel. We SHOULD, but we never will.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      What?

      American military escorting American aid isn’t a military action against Israel

      Israel claims they can’t let aid trucks in because Hamas will steal it.

      American escort means Israel can’t use that excuse, and if Israel attacks it, they’d be attacking the American military.

      That isn’t a military action against Israel in any way shape and form.

        • nac82@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Israel apologized for the attack, saying that the USS Liberty had been attacked in error after being mistaken for an Egyptian ship.[5] Both the Israeli and U.S. governments conducted inquiries and issued reports that concluded the attack was a mistake due to Israeli confusion about the ship’s identity.[6] Others, including survivors of the attack, have rejected these conclusions and maintain that the attack was deliberate.[7][8]

          In May 1968, the Israeli government paid US$3.32 million (equivalent to US$28 million in 2022) to the U.S. government in compensation for the families of the 34 men killed in the attack. In March 1969, Israel paid a further $3.57 million ($28.5 million in 2022) to the men who had been wounded. In December 1980, it agreed to pay $6 million ($21.3 million in 2022) as the final settlement for material damage to the ship plus 13 years of interest

          From your source.

          It is misinformation to claim they faced no punishment. They accepted blame and paid retribution.

          I’m not going to comment on if the compensation is appropriate to the crime.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            2002, Captain Ward Boston, JAGC, U.S. Navy, senior counsel for the Court of Inquiry, said that the Court of Inquiry’s findings were intended to cover up what was a deliberate attack by Israel on a ship that the Israelis knew to be American.

                • nac82@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  They objectively paid a sum of over 60 million in today’s value for 1. The killed soldiers, 2. The wounded soldiers, and 3. The damaged materials.

                  It is objectively false to claim they suffered no consequences.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The argument for escorting aid in is because Israel will attack it… So what is the logical outcome of Israel attacking a US guarded convoy?

        We are not going to put our people in that situation.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          That still wouldn’t be a military action against Israel, and no American troops would be in Israel territory.

          What you’re saying is that Israel would view preventing their genocide against Palestinians as an attack on them and then be “forced” to attack the US troops…

          Israel would have to decide if they want to attack US military members to stop aid.

          I’m not talking about hiding one soldier in a crate for a “gotcha”. I mean a loud and proud military escort of aid. Something that is 100% normal regardless of it’s a war zone or not.

          I’ve spent 6 months of my life doing exactly this, lots more doing other stuff in the military.

          I know what I’m talking about.

          Not to mention, by your logic that would make Bidens plan to build a single pier over two months a military action as well…

        • HikingVet
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hey, could you link to that thread? By that, I mean backup your claim.

            • HikingVet
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Oh, just because I matched how you were speaking, I wasn’t nice?

              Edit: going to take some time to read through the comments. No opinion on the ones still up, but arguing with harderian729 is just a waste of fucking time and shouldn’t be done.

              • nac82@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I didn’t make any pretentious requests or questions of anybody, I just added my 2 cents.

                You need to read my comment better next time before attempting mimicry.

                But that is asking too much of somebody who is blatantly admitting they just want to stir the shitpot.

                Edit response to edit:

                Edit: going to take some time to read through the comments. No opinion on the ones still up, but arguing with harderian729 is just a waste of fucking time and shouldn’t be done.

                Lmao I said he should learn to read better and he decided to prove that point by throwing a fit about the wrong user.

                • HikingVet
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Wow, you really have a chip on your shoulder about this don’t you? Do you really think that someone making sure thier statement was clear is somehow impolite?

                  I said matched your manner of speaking, not that I was mimicking you.

                  Fuck sakes, chill dude.

                  • nac82@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    Holy shit what a meltdown. I dont even know what comments you are talking about lmao. And you turned around on that not responding edit within 2 minutes, doubt there was any sincere reading in that time period.

                    Calm down and come back when you feel you can handle reading a comment without freaking out.

          • Nudding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            He banned me from the politics sub for saying Biden is helping facilitate Israel’s genocide.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Never had a problem with him.

          And I’ve DMed him about mod questions before and he’s been super helpful.

          Sometimes we disagree, but no one agrees 100% of the time.

          I do think mods should have to at least report comments first so when they’re removed it shows in the mod log. But I seriously doubt he’s removing comments just for disagreeing with him.

          I’ve seen some really down voted comments from him, with lots of people disagreeing. If he did what you said, I’d never see that.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          If that were true I would have already nuked your nonsense and banned you. Technically this is breaking rule 4:

          “No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

          “may be removed”. ;)

          • nac82@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m yet to see you leave a response that isn’t rule breaking to me. Between direct personal attacks, threats, links to videos, misinformation, and direct references to moderation are all okay for you to participate in.

            I’m certain you are baiting an excuse to scrub this entire chain.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              Again, if any of that were true, I would have already done so. The fact of the matter is, you have a right to be incredibly wrong. You haven’t actually broken the rules.

              Now, someone rolls in with some tin-foil hattery, vaccine denial, election denial? Yeah, that’s going to get removed and likely banned. I won’t lose sleep over it.

              There are others that get removed that I legit feel bad over. Good stories that are important and need to be seen, just not in this group.

              You see that one today about the Lego Police Officers? Freakin’ brilliant that is. I hope it gets re-posted somewhere that allows image posting.

              • Nudding@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                You banned me for saying that Biden is engaged in a genocide. Is personally providing the weapons, specifically without congressional approval, to a country actively conducting a genocide, not engaging with said genocide?

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        The US? Oh, absolutely. We’ve been protecting and justifying Israel’s bad behavior for decades now.

        The analogy I like to use is Israel is the shitty little kid on the playground who thinks he can get away with anything because “my big brother can beat you up!”

        It’s going to keep happening until big brother steps aside and lets him get his nose bloodied.

        • Nudding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Genocide sounds way cuter when you use a children’s analogy. We’re all adults here so we don’t need cutesy analogies though. Joe Biden structured arms deals in a way that wouldn’t meet the minimum amount for congressional oversight, in order to enthusiastically deliver weapons being used in a genocide. A genocide that’s obvious to us commoners should be fucking pretty obvious to the person with the most military intelligence in the world. So, either he’s stupid as fuck, or an evil son of a bitch.

          Either way, he needs to face justice.