I once applied for a job where one of the requirements was “minimum 5 to 10 years experience in X”. My friend told me to submit a CV saying I have 3 to 6 years experience in X and see if they shortlist me.

  • EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    If a candidate is smart, I’m willing to accept less experience. If a candidate is less smart, I want them to have more experience. There is uncertainty in the minimum experience I’m willing to accept.

    While there are certainly cases where this annoys me (as another poster pointed out “up to 60% or more!”), this is not one of them as it could have an explanation.

    • key@lemmy.keychat.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      The standard way to express that is to have the minimum reqs be 5 and the preferred reqs be 10.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve seen it enough both ways to disagree with one being the standard.

    • owen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      For the scenerio you described, the minimum posted experience should be the bottom of the range. The top of the range could be used internally.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        So you accept that there can be a minimum range, but they should just hide it.