I’ve noticed that there are a few communities that tend to dominate when viewing all. Some days it gets to where looking at all isn’t very different than just looking at [email protected] or [email protected].

Before someone says “you can just block communities you don’t want to see,” it’s not that I never want to see them, it’s that I want to be able to have a view that shows me what is new and popular in a wide variety of communities. I appreciate seeing a few good memes in my feed. The problem is when that’s all I see. Changing the sort from active to hot or top x days doesn’t have much effect on which communities dominate, so that isn’t the solution either.

“You can just subscribe to communities you like”. True, but that has the effect of narrowing what I see. I’d like a view that showed me new things I never thought to subscribe to.

Lemmy devs - if you are reading this - it would be nice to have a feed that limited the number of posts showing up from any particular community. It could be a simple cutoff of 2 or 3 posts, or maybe some sort of weighting function to cause additional posts from the same community to appear lower in the sort order for that feed.

I’d love to hear what devs and other users think about this.

Edit: To everyone saying “just sort be new” - yes, that has its uses, but it only solves part of the problem. I’d like a feed that shows me what is new and popular, but from more than just one or two communities.

  • anolemmi@lemmi.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    177
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read something the other day that they’re working on a new sorting algorithm that would limit it to the top few posts from each community within a given time frame. Specifically to address this issue.

    No idea on timeframe or further details, or if I even summarized it correctly lol.

  • Odusei@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Idk it seems like a problem that will sort itself out as Lemmy grows, and artificially limiting how many posts from a community can reach the front page seems like a suboptimal solution that’s going to have unintended consequences down the line.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d agree if the coms in question were niche but so far in my experience they never are. When it comes to communities dominating All, it’s always bottom-of-the-barrel memes and porn. The posts from non-garbage communities that show up are usually by themselves

      • Odusei@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everyone’s definition of bottom of the barrel will be different, and nobody’s personal content preferences should be forced on the community as a whole. If you really dislike those communities that much you can block them.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I do, my blocklist is quite large already

          The point I’m making is that the communities that would be most affected (negatively) by it are the giant low effort meme/shitpost ones that don’t “need” the exposure to thrive because they’re general interest communities

          • Odusei@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right now those communities are more important than ever. They are what’s going to bring more people here and grow the fediverse. I don’t want to start hiding popular content at a time when Lemmy most needs to be popular.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Is the goal of Lemmy to follow the reddit playbook where quantity is more important than quality? I much prefer thoughtful, specific content to “mass appeal” content. There’s no shortage of places to find the latter, why does it need to be the focus here?

              • Odusei@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because this is donation-funded. Having a big audience is the only thing that can ensure financial stability long term.?

                And I don’t think content that is funny rather than informative is inherently bad or less important. There’s nothing wrong with this place being fun and not just some stuffy content classroom.

                • glimse@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The real issue I see is that it’s all reposted reddit content so Lemmy looks like a crappy clone instead of being its own thing. For those who enjoy those posts, why would they switch to a site that has the same posts but with empty comments sections?

                  I’m not saying it’s some huge problem or anything. I just don’t think limiting the amount of frontpage posts per community will negatively affect the site

    • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t Reddit totally weight by size of community tho? Not saying we should just ape the old site but I suspect it’s actually necessary for smaller communities to grow naturally.

      • Odusei@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think there are better ways to highlight smaller communities and grow them more organically, like a community dedicated to new and small communities (sorry if I fucked up that link, I’m new here) could highlight a new community each day worthy of our attention. Reddit used to have a subreddit of the day.

        Right now the number one thing federated social media needs is just more users. I worry they’ll feel discouraged if they stop seeing the content that gets the most upvotes right now.

        • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think I’m going to have to disagree with you on that. New communities is fine but as someone who’s been active over there for a while it definitely seems that the issue is that it’s impossible for small communities to get any traction on the main page. I think the most important thing for long term growth is making sure that new users don’t come over here and find that all the communities they are interested in are dead.

  • Socialphilosopher@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If a community has grown a lot, unfortunately it takes up all the posts on the homepage. If I were a developer, I would sort by weighted success. For example, if the “x” community has 1000 subscribers and the post gets 100 likes, it has ten percent success. If the other ‘y’ community has 100 people and gets 11 likes, it has 11 percent success. This overrides the post in community x because the post in community y is more successful. This is the logic of ‘weighted success’. With this logic, a better ranking formula can be created.

      • I figured that’s what Id see sorting by New Comments but that hasn’t actually been the case. Any new post or post with a new comment gets pushed up to the top immediately and doesn’t even take into account votes, but even refreshing the page all day doesn’t catch a lot of small communities unless they are also attracting attention.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The thing is, a 10% upvoted post on a 10,000 people community is more popular than a 90% upvoted post on a 1000 people community - those 10,000 people in the former community are 10,000 people interested enough in that kind of thing to subscribe, whilst only 1000 people are interested enough in the other kind of thing.

      So it does make sense to put the former higher up in the global page when sorted by popularity because globally that post was more popular.

      However I do think there should be someway to as a user push down posts from certain communities without outright blocking the whole thing: maybe som throttling-down based on the rate of posts per time (i.e. the upvote threshold for posts from a community to come out in All depends on the number of otherwise qualifying posts in the last X days/hours, thus explicitly targetting the “flooding with posts” itself) rather than the straight count of upvotes or the proportion of upvotes that you suggest.

      That said in the meanwhile I’m really tempted to block the more generic meme communities.

      • souperk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        General popularity is not a good metric IMO. If I like a community, then it shouldn’t matter if a million people like or it’s only me and my cousin. If the community likes the content, I want to see it.

        It’s trust between the members of a community.

        However, weighted sorting is not a solution too, upvotes counts are not linear. Maybe, quantile sort?

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What’s liked by the general population is a good metric for providing general stuff to the general population and that’s what we’re talking about in All.

          That average can however deviate a lot from the sweet spot for some people, quite possibly a large minority (even the majority depending on how concentrated or not people’s tastes are around it).

          Something that looks at your previous choices (or even generally stated choices in the form of communities you subscribe to or block) similarly to what some search engines and some social media sites will do, can shift that toward more your own specific tastes, but that’s computationally more expensive and requires more users and more user data to get better results (basically it’s finding certain kinds of users and local minima which are more satisfactory to them).

          I suspect something like an AI solution (not LLM, just a much simpler neural network) running on your own device that tries to predict what you’re going to click on and learns with what you do (or not) is the only way for a personalized “no fluff on my feed” solution, but that’s for apps running on top of Lemmy, not the Lemmy engine.

  • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another, related issue to this is that I find the three frontpage categories (All/Local/Subscribed) to be too blunt of a sorting method.

    I would really love if we had the option to create subcategories to our Subscribed feed, so we could group related communities and end up with different frontpages for News/Sports/Memes etc.

  • BURN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    I generally use “New Comments” as my sorting and it’s a little bit better, but still the same spammy communities end up on top

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        So many memes

        I don’t hate it yet, since they’re the memes of my childhood/teen years, so tbh I find them funnier than the post 2016/18 bullshit

  • fhqwgads@possumpat.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d love some kind of per community bias adjustment even for subscribed communities. Like, I don’t really want to remove them cause memes are great, but because [email protected] and 196 post so often my subscribed feed is pretty dominated by them no matter how I sort it.

    For “All” some kind of adjustment based on subscribers makes sense, but I don’t even know if that’s possible given the way Lemmy works. Maybe a “show me less” button that moves the same bias adjustment just for communities you’re not subscribed to?

  • Rottcodd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Note that this is one of the advantages of having an account on a smaller and/or more focused instance or having multiple accounts.

    All “Alls” are not the same. Actually, the “All” displayed on a given instance is everything local to that instance and everything from other instances to which someone on that instance has subscribed. So if nobody from that instance has subscribed to a particular community on another instance, then for all intents and purposes, it just doesn’t exist. Even on “All”.

    Granted that it’s somewhat unlikely for an instance to not have someone somewhere along the way subscribe to some notably popular community, it is possible, and the smaller and more focused the instance is, the more likely it is.

    • WndyLady@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for teaching me. I can see that causing challenges down the road.

      For example, I’m always on the lookout for all things quilting. If someone names their quilting community “Fabric Hordes” (not impossible, just look at phenomenon like r/animetitties) it wouldn’t come up in my explicit searches, and is very unlikely to be sought out or found by others in my instance.

      • Rottcodd@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, but there are lots of ways around that.

        There’s already been a fair amount of demand for some method to group communities by interest, so it’s essentially guaranteed that somebody is going to provide some way to do that, and likely multiple somebodies are going to figure out multiple ways.

    • Knightfall
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, would it be wise and helpful for a mod or bot per instance to subscribe to as many communities as possible to help the instance’s feed?

      • Rottcodd@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hell no.

        How does that “help” their feed? What possible benefit could there be in using a bot to subscribe willy-nilly to every community out there, no matter how shitty it is?

        I mean - if some instance owner wants to do that, that’s their choice, and I guess there are people out there who would like the resulting instance filled to the brim with every bit of garbage that exists anywhere in the fediverse, so it’s safe to assume that somebody will do it sooner or later. Personally, I think the idea is repulsive though.

        Maybe I wasn’t clear enough in that other post - I think that the fact that each instance has a different “All” depending on what the members there have subscribed to is a good thing. It means that different instances have different feels, and over time, as they get more established, that’s going to be even more the case.

        So for instance, a notably tech-oriented instance is going to end up displaying pretty much every tech-oriented community on the fediverse on its All because somebody on the instance will have subscribed to it, pretty much no matter what it is, AND at the same time, all of the stuff nobody’s interested in just won’t be there at all, because nobody bothered to subscribe to it in the first place.

        Granted that that’s not going to appeal to people who want to be flooded with every bit of garbage on the entire fediverse when they click All, but they can just go away and sign up with some other instance that gives them what they want. Which I’m sure is exactly what the people who sought out a tech-oriented instance in the first place would prefer anyway.

        • Knightfall
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          How does that “help” their feed? What possible benefit could there be in using a bot to subscribe willy-nilly to every community out there, no matter how shitty it is?

          I don’t know… You made it sound like the only way for me to have more communities show up in my All feed on lemmy.ca would be if a volunteer on lemmy.ca, be it a bot or mod, subscribed to all the communities they could find. Hense seeing top posts from All communities. And I only meant for a bot or mod to just subscribe. Not to repost everything.

          If that isn’t how it works, sorry. It is why I asked if that would work or not.

          • Rottcodd@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You don’t need a mod or a bot to do it for you. You can go find communities on other instances and subscribe to them, and that all by itself gets them added to the All feed on your home instance.

            Or you could just register an account on a different instance that slready has more stuff on it, like lemmy.world.

    • travysh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah. I had noticed that lemmy.world’s all seemed different than lemm.ee’s, which in turn was also different than kbin. That’s good to know

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    This was an issue Reddit used to have circa 2015. Front page was all League of Legends posts, and then it was all The_Donald posts. Then Reddit screwed up their algorithm and it was literally 100% The_Donald posts.

    • Savirius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The important takeaway here is that it took a long time before it was actually good. They had to try a bunch of different sorting algorithms before they found one that really worked and let you see your small subs just as much as your big ones.

      It might take a while here too unfortunately.

  • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know about anyone else’s experience, but I’ve noticed that any time I click into a post view and then back out, I’m taken to the first page of posts, no matter if I was 2 or 3 pages on. If the redirect respected where it came from instead of going to home, that could reduce the impact of post-order sorting. Also if the list pager had more options than ‘prev’ and ‘next’ (maybe a few numbered pages between or beyond) I could get beyond that 3rd page without getting there feeling like an illustration of the schlemiel the painter’s problem

  • SuperFola@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fyi the devs aren’t reading this (and probably won’t be before long, since they are busy just coding a lot of features). Best place to ask for this is on the issue tracker (first check if it hasn’t been asked before), even better implement it yourself if you can!

  • theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m right there with you - I’m making an app called flemmy, and I have 12 more tasks on my list before I’m putting it on the play store - should be this weekend at the latest. Iphone build shouldn’t be that far behind. I can also make a desktop build if anyone wants it, but right now have no intentions to host a site myself - I strongly feel the data the app collects shouldn’t leave your device

    Version 1 is about creating something close to the Reddit apps I used to use, and it’s there - just needs a little more polish (and to let you post… I’m more of a commenter, so I forgot that was a thing for an embarrassingly long time)

    I can support all sorts of filters, from keywords to hiding specific posts to “snoozing” communities. I can also save your place when you change sort methods or accounts - it’s what I always wanted for Reddit.

    Also, I have support for redirecting links - Twitter to nitter, YouTube to pipe, etc.

    Version 2 is going to focus on your feed. Already I connect to multiple servers (it’s a real headache, but the foundation is there), so next is stitching feeds together and custom feed algorithms. What you mention is at the top of my list - a way to tweak the feed based on all sorts of filters.

    Ideally, I want it to adapt to you - using upvotes and comments to tweak your feed. All on your phone - it’s amazing what you can do on a phone when you’re not interested in data collection

    I just made [email protected], I’ll post some screenshots when I need a longer break

    • whatever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Awesome, that you develop tools for lemmy! Thank you.

      A question: Did you consider to publish your app on the F-Droid-Store? I only use apps from there and the only usable app for lemmy is jerboa. An alternative to that would be awesome, as it has quite a lot of problems.

  • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Browse by New. Bam! Problem solved! Stop being slaves of the Algo. Actively search for stuff you like while also actively block those you don’t like.

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Better solution: don’t use Lemmy as your feed, use a feed reader (RSS). There are per-channel feeds that you can sort and filter using parameters.

    Doing things this way will also help create the open web we all want to see, where “forum” is not a synonym for “Reddit” or “Lemmy”, where you can also follow the goings-on in other places and not miss anything.

    • PixelProf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I really think it’s important to not see Lemmy as one singular community, or a lot of important use cases will go ignored.

  • souperk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    yes! yes! yes! I have the same problem.

    My suggestion is to add a view with subscriptions ordered by the selected criterion (i.e. new/active/hot/top) and below each community there is vertical list with posts from that community sorted.

    This would allow see what’s up with the communities we follow and then jump in those communities if we find anything interesting.