• floofloof
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Oh no, not irreparable injury to a completely useless and environmentally damaging industry! Better keep causing irreparable damage to the planet instead then.

  • Darkassassin07
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ie: “no you can’t shut down crypto miners for pointless ecological destruction, I’m making great money off their wasteful power usage”

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This isn’t even an effort to shut them down; just report the harm they do.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        But that might lead to eventually maybe doing somethinginvestors!

        Think of the investers!

      • Darkassassin07
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Documenting the harm is one of the first steps to ending it…

        "stop these atrocities!’ “what atrocities? You’ve no evidence what’s happening is bad.”

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    When are we going to start telling these people their opinion is irrelevant, when we are going to war over water in the next decade? God, this is like watching a car accident in slow motion…

  • krellor@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    It really doesn’t seem that hard to report electrical usage. The wording of the order (https://www.eia.gov/pressroom/releases/press550.php) isn’t very specific, but it sounds like they would simply be surveying major commercial miners. All they should need to do is pull up their electrical usage. Of if they don’t have it for some reason, they can estimate based on their devices and aggregate hash rate.

      • krellor@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Right; I just wonder what the judges imagined rationale is? It seems like it would be hard to construct even the veneer that it actually creates an unreasonably burden. But this is Texas, so🤷?

  • Dippy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    How could I possibly operate my business if I can’t destroy the planet?