Companies knew for decades recycling was not viable but promoted it regar

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Reduce —> The most important thing to do.

    Re-use —> Second-most important thing you can do.

    Recycle —> Literally scraping the bottom of the barrel in terms of effectiveness of reducing pollution.


    There is absolutely a reason corporations honed in on the least effective of the three and tossed the other two out the fucking window. First two don’t jive with a consumer market filled with Planned Obsolescence.

  • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    No, plastics producers knew “recycling cannot go on indefinitely”. So did anyone else who spent a few moments thinking about it.

    The same is true of paper recycling or even trying to reuse non-disposable goods. Nothing lasts forever.

    That doesn’t mean recycling is not a “real” solution. There is real value in “prolonging the time until an item is disposed of”. Otherwise why bother to exercise and eat healthy - after all that only prolongs the time until you die.