Israeli troops have entered Nasser Medical Complex, the hospital in southern Gaza where thousands of displaced Palestinians had been sheltering in recent days, Gaza’s health ministry and the Israeli military said on Thursday.

Ashraf al-Qudra, the health ministry’s spokesman, said in a statement that the Israeli military had demolished the complex’s southern wall and begun storming it. In a second statement, he said Israeli forces were targeting the hospital’s orthopedic department, killing one patient and injuring several others.

The Israeli military said in its own statement on Thursday morning that it was “conducting a precise and limited operation inside Nasser” against Hamas, which it accused of hiding in the hospital among wounded civilians. It said it had intelligence, including from released hostages, that Hamas had held hostages at the hospital and that bodies of hostages could be at the hospital.

Archive

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    why the fuck are they targeting hospitals at all.

    and they even brag about it fuck off

      • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        …and don’t show too much concern for the civilians in the midst who die as a result of IDF actions

        “Hamas uses them like human shields, we warned them to leave the hospital/the house/the street/Gaza City/Khan Younis/Gaza entirely”

        If someone takes a hostage/uses human shields, you don’t stoop to the same level and disregard that human life, bombing/shooting anyway bc ‘muh military necessity’

        • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          That last part isn’t always as black and white as we’d like it to be, though. When (the conventional forces of) ISIS had been surrounded in Raqqa they just bombed and shot the shit out of them, civilians be damned. Horrible, but those that decry it don’t usually offer any realistic alternative.

          • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Here’s an alternative then:

            Israel makes an effort to provide a space away from the fighting, where civilians can live until “Hamas is destroyed”. It doesn’t even have to be outside of Gaza, but it’s arguably a better security idea to make a new camp inside Israel proper

            The IDF made a big noise about ‘defeating’ Al-Qassam in northern Gaza around Gaza City, that was an opportunity to provide a safe area.

            • Pick an open area, there’s several in the agricultural zones up north
            • Perform through search for weapons caches, tunnels, etc
            • Create tent city for displaced civilians
            • Offer safe passage (but like, actually do it this time) and as people arrive you process them for signs of terrorist activity - explosives swab tests, checked against known terrorist lists, etc

            It won’t be perfect at keeping militants OUT of the camp, but it would help keep civilians AWAY from the fighting

            • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              Moving the civilians from Rafah to tent cities is exactly what Israel has proposed. But what do you do with the civilians that choose to remain?

              • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                It won’t be perfect at keeping militants OUT of the camp, but it would help keep civilians AWAY from the fighting

                I’m not falling into the Nirvana fallacy. There will always be holdouts (people were living in Bahkmut during the siege, refusing to evacuate) but that doesn’t then give the IDF permission to throw up their hands and say “welp, we tried - bombs away” Shooting through a human shield is not a moral strategy, nor a long term strategy, and eventually you’ll apply that tactic against the people you’re trying to save, not just ‘enemy’ civilians

                • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  It’s unclear what you’re advocating for then. Why move some civilians to tent cities if you’re not going to attack Hamas anyway?

        • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Unfortunately, its not that simple. Hamas is a terrorist organization that activly targets civilians, often over military targets. Killing them sooner, as well as helping end the war, protects civilian lives. Its a terrible calculus, but when you’re fighting an organization that has no respect for law, nor human rights then thats what happens. You kill them, or you let them continue to kill civilians and millitary personal alike.

          That said, saying that Israel is just doing this because Hamas is using civilians as a sheild is giving Israel way too much credit. They have repeatedly been caught shooting unarmed and fleeing civilians, targeting refugees, and they have a long history of this treatment towards Palistinians. Israel is almost as willing to kill civilians as Hamas, and actually have the weapons to do so.

          • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            That is literally the opposite of decades of think tank, academic, and military research into Counter Insurgency strategies. You need to show the civilians living in the area that there’s another way via political process, and that rejecting violence is the way forward. Al-Qassam exists and is given permissive operations inside of Gaza because the people view them as the best route to a future. Throwing stones at a brick wall isn’t effective, but to Palestinians in a hopeless scenario it’s understandable to take up violence when the alternative is ethnic destruction in slow-motion.

            Israel isn’t offering any solution but continued suffering, displacement as refugees, or ethnic cleansing. I disagree with the Palestinian resistance, but we are here because of years of failed peace processes where Israel rejects the option of dignity for Palestine.

            • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I agree overall, and that was exactly my point with, “history of this behavior towards Palistine”. Its also why I felt the need to specify that Israel is killing civilians outside of when Hamas hides behind them. Israel is not a “good guy” here, and their misdeeds are what spurred this on.

              My point was on negotiating with terrorists, once they’ve already turned to violence. If it gets to the point of terrorism, its a lot harder to just let individuals involved walk free. Hamas will just keep trying to kill people, and keep hiding behind civilians, continuing to cost lives.

              Again, I agree overall, but even if Israel withdraws from Palistine, walks back all their oppresive policies and agrees to start cracking down on mistreatment from individual Israelis, Hamas won’t just disolve overnight nor will radicalized individuals immediately put down their arms. Its a process that takes decades (likely longer given how long and how intensely Israel has been oppressing Palistine), which doesn’t help when you’re deciding whether or not to shoot the terrorist with a hostage.

              • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                It’s a long road for Northern Ireland, but it’s working right now, despite Brexit issues. The key difference is that the state recognized its role in perpetuating the cycle of violence, and chose to offer another route.

                There are a lot of parallels in that resistance struggle with Palestine, but while a good compromise leaves everyone upset today, your children get to grow up hearing bombs on TV, instead of their nightmares.

            • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              Plenty of insurgencies have been ‘solved’ effectively by violence. A lot more actually. And in this case, a peaceful solution is almost impossible because at its roots it’s a religious conflict.

              • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                If by ‘solved effectively by violence’ you mean ‘genocided’ or ‘ethnically cleansed’ then yes. Is that what you’re suggesting is proper and good?

                • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Proper and good?? No, it’s horrible.

                  In the case of Western-Sahara though, the threat of extreme violence was enough to pacify the resistance without any political concessions.

                  But my main point here is that because of religious differences, both zionist and muslim fundamentalists will never be able to peacefully coexist, as they believe god doesn’t want them to. And there are plenty of them on both sides

            • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’m not sure what is reportable there. Im literally saying civilian deaths should be minimized. Is it because I’m acknowledging Israel has repeatedly targeted civilians?

              • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                4 months ago

                I think you’ve replied to the wrong comment

                Anyway that user has a history of, how should I put it… Not really valuing opposing viewpoints

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        They are going for ethnic cleansing, and its pretty obvious by now.

      • Encode1307@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re getting down voted for a factual statement. That makes a lot of sense. /s

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Pretend scenar?

            10 people are brought in on a line up and a witness is asked who was guilty of the murder. The witness identifies 1 of the people as the murderer never having seen the other 9. They gun down all 10 to be sure the murder doesn’t get away.

            Do you think that scenario would be the right thing to do?

            • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              Before I answer, could you give me a hint on how your scenario relates to the raid into this hospital?

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago
    1. Israel troops shot Hamas fighters.
    2. Hamas fighters got hurt, went to hospital
    3. “We found Hamas in this hospital”
    4. ???
    • SpaceCowboy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      And apparently their injuries weren’t so severe so they had time to stash their weapons in the hospital.

      Just a normal everyday thing to stash assault rifles and grenades in a hospital, right?

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The last time they “found” weapons it came out that they had planted them.

  • Gazumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Such heroes! Using only vastly superior weapons and tech, they overcame steep military odds and took a hospital. … (Sarcasm plus tears)

    • SpaceCowboy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      War is not a sport where things are supposed to fair for either side.

      What you should think on is why did Hamas start a war with an enemy with vastly superior weapons and tech by going into villages and butchering women and children? What was their goal?