• Meeech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    As soon as I saw the right wing conspiracy theories about KC winning, I knew something was going to happen if they won. It’s such a sad state we’re in when a sporting event is politicized.

    • iliketurtles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sounds like it was a dispute between a handful of teens. Why these dumbasses decided to bang it out with all those people and cops around is beyond me.

  • rusticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Nothing can be done, says only nation where this happens regularly.

    If there are no sharks, there are no shark fatalities.

      • Evia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes, well done. The US is behind Iraq and Zimbabwe so of course nothing needs to be done in the US until those countries sort their shit out

        • maness300@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’ve literally said this isn’t the only nation this happens regularly and now you’re moving the goalposts rather than admitting they were wrong.

          • SpaceCowboy
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            You shifted the goal post by making it about not being at the bottom of a list instead of the sensible assumed goal of striving for being the best.

            Changing the goalpost and claiming someone else moved the goalpost is a debating tactic of someone who knows they’re wrong.

                • maness300@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  It’s objective fact.

                  If you think the United States is “the only nation where this regularly happens” then you are objectively wrong. It’s literally quoting an onion article. Lol.

                  It doesn’t matter who upvotes you, but a lot of you people don’t get that.

      • GreyEyedGhost
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        For the record, the statement is about mass shootings, not homicides.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well, it is the USA after all. It is no good American party without some gun action, it seems.

    • Fapper_McFapper@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Republicans fought against gun control legislation, they did nothing after Sandy Hook Elementary.

      Republicans did nothing after Sandy Hook Elementary.

      Republicans did nothing after 20 children aged six to seven years old were gunned down with a Bushmaster XM15-E2S rifle at Sandy Hook Elementary.

      Republicans will continue to do nothing.

      Just remember, if you’re ever caught in the crossfire, thank a Republican. If you survive.

      You want to live? You want to let your children go to school without worrying about them being killed by a mass shooter? You want to go to the grocery store and come back home alive? STOP VOTING FOR REPUBLICANS!!! It is literally that fucking easy.

      Carry on.

      • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Republicans didn’t do “nothing” after Sandy Hook, they did the most republican thing they could do: advocate for arming school children and staff.

      • quindraco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        In a Reddit thread about this, someone got so mad when I pointed out they were wrong about the Sandy Hook shooter owning his guns, even though that’a a critical piece to implementing saner gun control: checks on the purchaser would have accomplished nothing here, as his mother bought the guns. You’d need to take a different approach, like free public mental health care (or repealing the second amendment, but that’s much harder). One of the first steps toward even attempting saner gun control laws here is working out what’s going wrong. shaking my head

        Anyway. You are right, but not right enough. We need people like Bernie Sanders in charge if you want to see meaningful change in gun control.

        • GooseFinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Bernie wasn’t much of an anti-2A advocate until he ran for the Democratic bid in 2016. Align with party values or get out.

          Our country is sick. Healthcare is inaccessible and right out unaffordable, the Bible belt vilifies science, education is both piss poor and stupid expensive, we’re the richest country on the planet but a tiny handful of grubs are hoarding all the wealth, something something preaching to the choir.

          People wouldn’t commit politically motivated domestic terrorism if living here wasn’t made intentionally shitty by the people in charge. I want our planet to stop burning, but they’re only focused on revoking trans rights or whatever fabricated problem they’re whining about this week. Americans need to wake the fuck up and stop being so complacent.

      • maness300@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think it’s more fruitful to address why people go on killing sprees instead of trying to prohibit the tools that they use.

        To this day, it doesn’t make sense for someone living in rural America to be against gun ownership because they have to rely on themselves for their own protection.

        That said, there are legitimate arguments to be made for allowing cities to ban gun ownership.